| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Commentary: Letter from Baghdad |
| 2003-09-04 |
| By former human shield Rev. Ken Joseph Jr., who initially was against the war, was so shocked at his experiences while in Iraq before the war as one of the few allowed in without government "minders," he changed his mind. EFL: I have been shocked at the difference between the Baghdad I found on my return and all the bad news from the city. Despite the recent bombings, Baghdad looks dramatically different. The stores are full of supplies. The streets are crowded with people and cars. The buses are working and police are on the streets, directing traffic. At night the streets are full of pedestrians, many families with children. I am at a loss to reconcile what we see on the ground with what is being reported. I’m not. The "regular people" are much better off than they were. Security has improved with Iraqi police everywhere, telephones are starting to work, electricity, while off and on, is relatively stable, the stores are full of food, and, little by little, people are getting jobs back. Pensions have been paid on time. The schools are working and people for the first time have hope and a future. When I was here before the war what was most awful for people was that they had no future — nothing to look forward to. For us who have never experienced that situation, it is difficult to understand, but it is akin to being in prison without the possibility of parole. Those who naysay everything are very interesting. The people are very clear on who they are — they all were connected to Saddam. For the first time in their lives, they are going to have to work; no more handouts. The easy life is over. But the numbers are staggering. People estimate nearly 20 percent or more of the population was in some form on Saddam’s gravy train, some by choice, others by force. And nearly all of the population had been getting free food, tea and sugar. As for the crime, they emptied the prisons so nearly 50,000 hard-nosed criminals are on the streets. Another problem is just as it was before the war — the outsiders. I cannot understand why the United States has not done two basic things: sealing the borders and setting up a TV station. There is no border check so Iraq is becoming the magnet for every one that wants to get a chance to fight with Americans. This is a great puzzle to me. One might think it was part of a plan. What is happening, including the bombings, as far as people who I talked to are concerned, is the work of foreign nuts -- the same people who were the only ones to fight for Saddam at the later part of the war. They are coming from all over the world like they did in Afghanistan to get a chance to fight Americans. And that worked so well for them, didn’t it? I always remember how in Jordan everybody loved Saddam, whereas in Iraq everybody hated him. Funny how that works, the left still feels the same way about Stalin. Great guy, as long as you didn’t have to live under him. With all due respect, people in Iraq in general hate radical Islam. They are secular. They do not want to see an Islamic state. They do not want to become like Iran. At the same time, money and people from Iran, Saudi Arabia and other places are flooding the country using intimidation to accomplish what they cannot do by any other means. Think car bombs. And average Iraqi is concerned at what seems to be a U.S. position, that is soft on Islam. Gee, and here I thought we were trying to crush islam under the heels of our cowboy boots. Interesting article. |
| Posted by:Steve |
| #8 I should have included a /sarcasm tag, I suppose. |
| Posted by: Ernest Brown 2003-9-5 12:18:25 AM |
| #7 I read the pre-war article and it sounded powerfully genuine. I have never met Cheif Wiggles nor Lt Smash but elements of what they include would be hard to fake. Realistically, how could we be smart enough to dream up a fake human shield and still have not "found" WMD nor set up a decent TV station. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2003-9-4 9:28:53 PM |
| #6 Michael: of course. My point was that I didn't think he was a CIA plant - just that he had interests other than human-shielding in that country. |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2003-9-4 6:02:19 PM |
| #5 Well, Mitch, I remember Joseph's pre-war article. He did claim to be anti-war until he talked to Iraqis, both Chrisian and Muslim, who gave him the non-Baghdad Bob picture of the situation. So, it depends if you believe that people such as he are capable of changing their minds once confronted with a complete contradiction of what they had been previously fed. If he has ulterior motives, they are at worst his wanting to stick up for his co-religionists peacefully. Wish the scum from Saudi, Iran, and Syria had similar methods of supporting co-religionists. |
| Posted by: Michael 2003-9-4 5:00:13 PM |
| #4 Actually, I suspect Joseph of being a "pretend-shield" with religious ulterior motives. He's an Assyrian Christian missionary who got into Iraq last year by claiming to be "anti-war". |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2003-9-4 3:00:18 PM |
| #3 I suspect Joseph of being a CIA plant. No -real- human shield is this capable of critical thinking. (sorry for misplacing it below) |
| Posted by: Ernest Brown 2003-9-4 2:44:43 PM |
| #2 GregJ, it's in the Washington Times. Just click on the title of a post and it will take you to the original story. |
| Posted by: Steve 2003-9-4 12:00:56 PM |
| #1 Steve - good article. Can you point to the source of this letter. Would like to point some people to it. |
| Posted by: GregJ 2003-9-4 11:53:23 AM |