You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Two years later: A more dangerous world
2003-09-12
Opinion by Shaheen Chughtai, al-Jazeera
After the United States overthrew the Taliban in Afghanistan and then ousted Saddam Hussein in Iraq, President George Bush assured his compatriots the world was a safer place. But two years and two foreign wars after 9/11 triggered Bush’s War on Terror, Americans do not feel safer, according to a US survey. While US troops are busy fighting “terror” abroad, their compatriots are often terrified back home.
Actually, we're not, usually. In fact, I'd say our attention span's short enough that we're coming to feel overly secure again, much more interested in Ben and Jen and Britney's honkers than in Zarqawi, Binny, the ayatollahs or Sheikh Yassin...
Worse still, Bush’s so-called War on Terror is creating more hostility, thus raising the risk of attacks against the US – a catastrophic policy failure.
The alternatives aren't something the rest of the world would like. I suppose we could give Osama a nice group hug, assuming we could find him, and tell him all is forgiven, but he (or his successors) would keep trying to kill us all because we don't wear turbans and our wimmin are free to drive around in cars, drink beer, get laid for recreation, and even hold opinions. That'd never do. The other alternative would be to briely raise the temperature in Mecca and Medina to 4000 degrees (Fahrenheit or Celcius, it wouldn't matter to the recipients, would it?) and slaughter all the turbans we can find. Because we, unlike our adversaries, are a civilized people, we don't want to do that. Instead, we follow a middle ground, trying to defeat the actual perpetrators of actions of terrorism — notice there aren't any quotes around the word — without killing too many innocent by-standers. If you don't like it, that's really pretty tough. Buy yourself a turban and get in line.
Many Americans remain fearful because they are sceptical the battle against global terrorism will end soon, says Professor Robert Shapiro, a specialist in public opinion and mass media at the University of Columbia, Massachusetts. “The $86 billion that (President George) Bush just asked for — that’s not for a quick fix,” he says.
"It's not a sprint, it's a marathon." Rumsefeld said that, a month after 9-11-01.
“And there are reminders. At the airport, train stations, you see things you didn’t see before: heavily-armed police at public events, like concerts.”
That's because wild-eyed homicidal maniacs attacked us two years ago and killed a few thousand of us. Forgot, did you, Robert?
Such disturbing novelties help explain why 75% of US citizens think the world is more dangerous than it was a decade ago. That is sharply up from 53% surveyed by the Washington-based Pew Research Centre a few days before the attacks on 11 September, 2001.
Comes as a surprise, huh? (Where do they get these people?)
Similarly, the proportion who believe the US is more likely to face a biological, nuclear or chemical attack jumped from 51% to 64%.
Since they Bad Guys are assiduously pursuing those types of weapons, they might be justified...
Today, around 40% of Americans say they often worry terrorists may attack their country with nuclear weapons – a relatively novel concern.
In response to a relatively novel threat. Y'see, we're civilized enough not to use WMDs against people unless they use them against us first. The terrorists aren't...
“The threat of terrorism is now part of the fabric of American life,” notes the Pew survey, titled Two Years Later, the Fear Lingers. Released the week before the second anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, it reveals three quarters of Americans fear occasional acts of terrorism are now "unavoidable".
That's because we're at war with terrorism, both as a concept and as an organized activity. When you're at war, you strike your enemy and your enemy tries to strike you. Sometimes he succeeds. Even the public recognizes that, when they're not watching the teevee...
After the World Trade Center collapsed in a swirling mountain of ash, sympathy for the United States swelled around the planet. As an editorial in France’s Le Monde newspaper famously declared: “We are all Americans now”. But Bush’s challenging call of “You’re either with us or against us” has received mixed reviews. According to another Pew study – Views of a Changing World – the US has become markedly less popular in most countries surveyed.
Allow me to clutch my teddy very tight at this point and holler "Oh, no!"... There. Got it out of my system. Let's get on with killing turbans and ignore the Frenchies and their hangers-on...
Polling 16,000 people in 20 countries this summer and more than 38,000 people in 44 counties the year before, the study finds the war against Iraq has further widened divisions between the US and its European allies. A majority in five of seven NATO countries surveyed now wants greater independence in diplomatic and security matters: from 57% of Germans to 76% of French citizens. Only in Britain and Italy did the US enjoy anything like the popularity it had before.
We noticed that. Both sides are still dealing with the repercussions. Guess the world's changed, like it or not. And now we know who's against us. We're even discovering why they're against us, in a lot of cases...
Some observers dismiss what they see as superficial sentiments or crude cultural defensiveness. “There’s a lot of anti-Americanism in Europe, a lot of jealousy,” says Dr Vernon Bogdanor, an international relations specialist at the University of Oxford in Britain. The cause, Bogdanor suggests, may be a sense that Europeans lack influence over US actions.
If it had been 3000 dead Frenchies, they'd probably feel different. If it had been the Brandenburg Gate instead of the World Trade Center, they'd probably feel different.
But Bush’s domestic critics have taken notice. Howard Dean, a Democratic presidential candidate and former Vermont governor, has blamed the president for transforming the “tidal wave of support and goodwill that engulfed us after the tragedy of 9/11” into “distrust, scepticism, and hostility”.
It's nice to have good will. A pile of dead turbans is better...
For many in the Muslim world, public support for the US has been replaced by fear and loathing.
My mind must be going. I can't remember that public support, no matter how hard I try...
Anti-US sentiment used to be more restricted to the Middle East, but US popularity over the past year has plummeted among Muslims worldwide, from Nigeria (71% to 38%) to Indonesia (61% to 15%), the survey finds. Even in Kuwait, whose people were grateful to US forces for expelling Iraqi troops in 1991, more than half now fear the US could turn against them one day.
It's easy to avoid. Don't attack us. Don't harbor those who attack us. Don't finance those who attack us. What's so difficult about that concept? If you don't do that, we don't care if you make faces and jump up and down, though we might think about it next time you need help...
Dr Emad Shaheen, a political scientist at the American University in Cairo, lists three key factors that have encouraged disliking of the US in much of the Muslim world. These are the direct US attacks against Afghanistan and Iraq, support for Israel as it suppresses the Palestinian uprising, and the perception that the Bush administration is pursuing an ideological struggle against Islam. “The War on Terror is seen as really a War on Islam,” says Shaheen. “People see US actions against Muslim organisations, other actors, even educational bodies, and there is a feeling of an onslaught against Islam,” he says.
Actually, it's a war on Islamism, which is a slightly different creature. There aren't any Sufi terrorist organizations I'm aware of. There aren't any Ismaili terrorist organizations I'm aware of. There are Shia terrorist organizations, and there are a rapidly proliferating number of Salafist terror machines. Guess who the enemy is?
“They see the demeaning and dehumanising treatment of Muslim prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, they see US-made F-16s hitting the Palestinians — and how the war in Iraq was prosecuted.”
They ignore the dehumanizing treatment of Afghan citizens by the Talibs and the strutting al-Qaeda bully boys lording it over the natives. The U.S.-made F-16s retaliate against the people who kill five-year-olds in their beds. And we prosecuted the war with Iraq with special efforts not to kill any more people than we absolutely had to. But we'll never get credit for that...
The result is a damaging blow to stated US policy goals. “More attacks against the US can be expected,” says Shaheen, referring both to resistance activity in Iraq and operations from international groups such al-Qaida.
That's because the war's not over yet, and it won't be for many years...
It does not sound like a safer world.
It's not. But it's not safer for Islamists, either.
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#17  Who's it more dangerous for, Shaheen? Us or you? Call Binny, Sammy, and Mullah O up on the Al-Jiz hotline and ask them how safe they feel. I'll bet they don't feel as safe as I do.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-9-12 5:30:15 PM  

#16  It's a terrible thought I know, but I often wonder what would have happened if the Spanish, flush with gold from the new world had continued their reconquesta into North Africa instead of fighting other Christians in Europe.
Posted by: Yank   2003-9-12 12:56:14 PM  

#15  I doubt seriously that the world is a more dangerous place today than it was two years ago. I do believe more of us are aware, and aware at a deeper level, just how dangerous the world is, and we've taken action to protect ourselves, our family, and out nation from that danger.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-9-12 12:26:57 PM  

#14  The way I see it, we're surrounded by a screaming horde of wild-eyed turbans, locked in mortal combat. Do we have time to listen to the neighbors complain about the noise and the occasional shrapnel that falls on their lawn?
Posted by: Fred   2003-9-12 12:03:24 PM  

#13  don't give a damn if we are liked or not. we as people have not changed - except for the fact that we are now defending ourselfs. Should've of happened years ago but we had a prez more concerned with his dick and legal problems to actually deal with real and present threats.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-9-12 11:58:34 AM  

#12  Seems to me the only difference between 9/10/01 and 9/12/03 is in 01 we nievly felt secure and safe.
In 03 we know better.
Do I fear the Islamists,no.
I am aware and wary of them as never befor,yes.
Will I cover my head and tremble in fear,no.
I will gleefully blow thier ass' away,
Posted by: raptor   2003-9-12 10:56:01 AM  

#11  Funny how Marlboro -- that symbol of the American cowboy -- keeps gaining share in Europe, isn't it?
Posted by: Sharon in NYC   2003-9-12 9:35:07 AM  

#10  The next election will provide some answers on whether America is still the home of the brave or has become the home of chicken s**t.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-9-12 9:08:11 AM  

#9  Today, around 40% of Americans say they often worry terrorists may attack their country with nuclear weapons – a relatively novel concern.

Ignoring the 40 years of "duck and cover" of course
Posted by: Tornado   2003-9-12 9:02:31 AM  

#8  I see nothing wrong with being interested in Britney's honkers...
Posted by: Raj   2003-9-12 8:29:40 AM  

#7  . . .They lost 15,000 due to the heat, and they don't seem too broken up about it. . . That merely reduced the welfare rolls (a good thing?)

Dorf
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-9-12 7:31:11 AM  

#6  "If it had been 3000 dead Frenchies, they'd probably feel different."

Not so sure. They lost 15,000 due to the heat, and they don't seem too broken up about it.
Posted by: Ben   2003-9-12 7:08:37 AM  

#5  These folks better pray that our war on terrorism works as we are fighting it. We know exactly how to make the world a safer place, and have the means to do it. We simply lack the will to turn every Arab country into a glass parking lot. So far.
Posted by: Ben   2003-9-12 7:03:42 AM  

#4  The world has never been "safe" for anyone. It became much less safe 1400 years ago when the horror seed of the religion called Islam, the RoP™, was invented out of thin air by a demented failing merchant "revealed" to a woman-hating tiny-dick depraved moron Mohammed, may bees pee upon him. Hell, I hope they shit fire upon him. If they don't, we will.

In typical Al Jizzwadi style, the author / apologist / propagandist who wrote this shit mongers his pathetic hope that we are terrorized. He quotes the mercantile phools, cowards, gutless turds, and self-haters who would've been killed and eaten by anything less than a free society. Blinded by his own hatred, he actually believes this pap will dishearten free people - particularly Americans.

Once again, the demented Islamists True Believers of the RoP™ demonstrate that haven't the first clue about America. To paraphrase a poster here on 9/11, and quoting a common poster from my youth, "When faced with annihilation, defiance is the only recourse." In addition to missing this fundamental aspect of American thinking, they have miscalculated our capabilities by at least a generation. The petrified mentality of the RoP™ is not conducive to critical thinking, as they have very recently begun to discover.

The RoP™ has cast the Arab world in amber, turned Pakiland into the world's largest insane asylum, and imported that same insanity into Asia. It has even been imported into Europe and North America with impunity due to blindered and frightened political blundering. It has begun its insect-like work to undermine these places, as well.

On 9/11/01 it reared its ugly, barabaric, brutal, backward, regressive, sick, perverse, down & twisted head in America - and at great cost to us it nonetheless actually did us the huge favor of showing its true face of hatred and cowardice. Al Qaeda has managed, with that one act, to undermine the implacable nature of the asshat RoP™ Islam. This dementia fervently prays for our destruction. It avidly explores ways to use our own freedoms and institutions and technologies against us, as it is bankrupt in all of these areas. It depends upon us to give in and, eventually, give up - for it is a collection of cowards who kill innocent people and cannot face us with any trace of honor.

It fears us, for we are mighty when we are resolved. It blathers about our freedoms being denied it, when it would happily destroy them were it to triumph. It cowers when we finally turn to confront it. It runs from us and hides in caves and behind the skirts of the women it enslaves. It cries out in pain when we locate a nexus of its hatred and strike back. It dies when freedom is allowed to shine. It has made war upon us of its own accord. We did not invite this hatred nor the attack upon us. Only one of them or a fool, perhaps which we have suffered in our midst in error, would believe the absurdity that we deserve this enmity.

What has begun is one of the Great Wars of Man. They have chosen the wrong opponent and have already lost, because we will never forget, nor will we ever forgive - and we are capable of destroying it to the root... and so we shall. With that tiny statement of fact, it is doomed - for the good of all mankind.
Posted by: .com (a.k.a. Abu This Asshat RoP™ True Believer)   2003-9-12 5:00:11 AM  

#3  OT : “They see the demeaning and dehumanising treatment of Muslim prisoners in Guantanamo Bay"; typical double standards at work; in early 2002, Algeria released moroccan draftees that had been held prisoners since 1976 in desert or underground camps, w/o any legal justification. In 2003, Polisario front also made a similar release. As far as I know, muslim "public opinion" never cared much about them, nor about the dozens that still remain.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-9-12 4:02:53 AM  

#2  And there are those who believe we can deal with people who's perspective on commonly shared experiences is so alien from our own beliefs! This article demonstrates that the Arabs and Muslims in the world regard good will as weakness and the inability to take direct action as morale exhaustion. Perhaps they spend alot of time with Democrat presidentail candidates.
Posted by: TJ Jackson   2003-9-12 1:52:50 AM  

#1  Too bad Al-Jazeera doesn't have a "right-of-reply" type deal, where they could (should) publish Fred's comments to this article. You never know, someone from that part of the world might actually learn something from the other side's opinion.
Posted by: Rafael   2003-9-12 12:50:37 AM  

00:00