You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iran
Europe too soft on Iran, says US
2003-11-18
BREAKING NEWS: The EU and IAEA have combined forces to create the incompetent bureaucracy the world has ever seen...
US Secretary of State Colin Powell has criticised a draft European resolution on Iran’s nuclear weapons programme as not being tough enough. Mr Powell said he had "a very candid discussion" with EU foreign ministers in Brussels on the issue. The US wants Iran declared in breach of its nuclear treaty obligations, a move that could lead to UN sanctions. The EU statement has been submitted to the UN’s nuclear watchdog which meets on Thursday to discuss Iran.

Speaking at a news conference in Brussels, Mr Powell said he was pleased that Iran "seems to be moving in the right direction." But he said the US did not believe that the Iranian Government had abandoned all efforts to produce nuclear weapons. He said the draft text on Iran offered by Britain, France and Germany was not tough enough on Tehran’s non-compliance with its treaty obligations. "We have some reservations ...about whether the resolution is strong enough to convey to the world the difficulties that we have had with Iran over the years," Mr Powell said. The BBC’s Europe correspondent, Chris Morris, says it is clear there were considerable disagreements between the US and the EU over Iran. While Washington is pushing for Iran to be reported to the Security Council, the European view is that constructive engagement with Iran should be given a chance to work, our correspondent says.
Even if it takes 12 years and 20 UN resolutions.
Last week, a report by IAEA inspectors said they had found no evidence that Iran has secretly been developing nuclear weapons. But they did admonish the Iranian authorities for being secretive. Iran has warned of serious consequences if the IAEA refers its nuclear programme to the Security Council. Tehran has always claimed its nuclear programme is designed to meet the country’s energy needs.
And they only read Playboy for the articles.
Posted by:g wiz

#5  What could we bribe them with? They already have oil. Probably wouldn't want any grain or GM stuff might turn their beautiful country into brown goo. I've got it. Ronald, I need 500,000,000 Big Mac's. Charge it to the General Fund of the Government of the people of the United States. Throw in the toys that go in the Happy Meals that will keep their kids happy and provide some useful work for the slave camps of NK.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-11-18 7:50:55 PM  

#4  Iran has a death wish. We are the only ones trying to prevent it before Israel has to stomp their asses for her own survival.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-11-18 7:31:04 PM  

#3  Last I checked...Iran's missiles couldn't reach the US mainland. So let's erect a theater missile defense system around Israel, and let the Euros wallow in their own crapulence. (er...aside from the oil)

/wishful thinking
Posted by: mjh   2003-11-18 4:35:14 PM  

#2  Mr Powell said he had "a very candid discussion" with EU foreign ministers in Brussels on the issue.

Heh. Didya call Dominique a cheese-munching neo-aristocratic pretentious asshole?

I sure hope so.
Posted by: mojo   2003-11-18 3:53:04 PM  

#1  Even if it takes 12 years and 20 UN resolutions.

This one should be called:

Iran and Nuclear Weapons: Iraq Again? or, Where Have We Seen This Before?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-11-18 3:50:45 PM  

00:00