You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
AL-QAEDA: new organization, old violence
2003-11-22
With al-Qaeda being linked to three devastating attacks in Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the last two weeks, the group appears to be leaving a new signature as an increasingly decentralized and unpredictable terrorist network that appears harder to fight. Experts and diplomats said the recent resurgence of al-Qaeda violence also showed that Osama bin Laden's 14-year-old terrorist fraternity was as lethal as ever, despite the U.S.-led war on terrorism. The organization essentially is reinventing itself to compensate for losses in its ranks, they said.
The fact that we're inflicting damage on them and causing their reorganization is a good sign, not a bad one. The Feds said last year that there are just 200 hardcore al-Qaeda. That figure doesn't include the cannon fodder, of course, or even all the middle managers, but just the "base" — al-Qaeda. The organization from the beginning has represented an alliance of gun-totin' organizations, with Binny's mob as a high command, coordinating and financing things. It's the high command we've been going after, but the component parts didn't give up their autonomy, and in fact the number of component parts has been growing because "al-Qaeda" represents the big time of terrorism at the moment. But "the base" itself has been transforming itself in an effort as self-preservation, with the Fath e-Islam group forming to run Afghanistan. The Karachi mob, when it was run by Ramzi bin al-Shibh, seems to have been autonomous, and the tools it used were the locals — Harkatul Mujaheddin al-Alaami, Lashkar e-Jhangvi, and various free-lance Jaish e-Mohammad groups. And then there's Ansar al-Islam and the Iran mob...
At the same time, U.S. intelligence officials said, the United States has diverted more than half the personnel and technology that was targeted on al-Qaeda to the war in Iraq. Bin Laden is believed to have escaped a dragnet in Afghanistan and remains free and in charge, but small cells in at least 50 countries seem to operate independently, striking when conditions suit their purposes and using locals as bombers, experts say. It's unclear how much direction they receive from al-Qaeda's surviving top leaders, such as Saif al-Adel, believed to be in Iran, and bin Laden's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Also reported to be in Iran. Mansoor Ijaz says he has that from "an unimpeachable source," and that both Ayman and Binny are masquerading as ayatollahs, complete with Iranian-style turbans and trimmed beards. I have my doubts about the reliability of that — it seems like suicide on the part of the ayatollahs. But the evidence seems pretty firm that Saif and Saad are in Iran at least...
"As the entity decentralizes, you're going to get a lot more wildcat operations," said Brian Jenkins of the Rand Corp., a policy research group in Washington.
And a lot more subcontracting, as we saw in Istanbul. But the "Qaeda" presence in Yemen seems to be mostly the Aden-Abyan Islamic Army, with an allied Qaeda element (the Hutat Group). In Europe it's al-Tawhid and various north African sympathizers. In Turkey they used the Great Eastern Raiders. In Chechnya they're riding Maskhadov's indigenous mob. And in Southeast Asia they're riding Jemaah Islamiyah. So what's new, other than the clarification?
Recent attacks underscore al-Qaeda's willingness to strike in Muslim countries, spreading new waves of apprehension in Turkey and in Saudi Arabia, where security forces are pressing a border-to-border crackdown that has crushed dozens of cells and resulted in more than 600 arrests. Experts believe, however, that at least 300 hard-core supporters and more than 1,500 sympathizers remain in the kingdom. "I fully suspect that... the terrorists who are here are planning additional attacks," said a Western diplomat in Riyadh who spoke on condition of anonymity. The U.S. Embassy in Riyadh remains open but is on a heightened state of alert, and the more than 30,000 Americans living in Saudi Arabia were urged to take extra precautions.
Soddy Arabia's the home of al-Qaeda, where its ideological fathers and its financiers live. The country's got its own population of "Afghan Arabs," and if I remember correctly it's got its own "Army of Muhammad."
Counterterror experts say al-Qaeda, a loose-knit network whose name means "the base," has mutated in reaction to a sustained U.S. assault. In both Saudi Arabia and Turkey, there are indications that local groups have adopted al-Qaeda's ideology and are trying to duplicate its methods without much external direction, said Daniel Benjamin, a former White House counterterrorism expert and coauthor of The Age of Sacred Terror. "We're seeing a different dynamic, sort of a second stage in the development of the radical jihadist" movement, he said.
That's what I just said...
Matthew Levitt, a former FBI counterterrorism analyst now at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said use of local groups had meant bombings were less meticulously planned and more often directed against last-minute targets of opportunity. Stopping such attacks "is all but impossible," he said.
The smaller-scale the attack, the harder it is to stop. I could get my gun and go out this evening and pot somebody — where's the tip-off to anybody trying to stop me?
There also have been hints of sloppiness. In May, a series of car bombings by an al-Qaeda-linked group in Casablanca, Morocco, killed 45, including 12 bombers, but did less damage than intended. And it is unclear whether those who struck the Riyadh compound this month knew it housed primarily Muslim Arabs.
Or cared. But Qaeda as a group isn't particularly concerned about the eggs going into the omelette...
One potential thread in some of the recent attacks is Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born operative who may now be in Iran and who is thought to have been behind the assassination last year in Jordan of U.S. diplomat Laurence Foley. Levitt said Zarqawi's operatives may have played a role in Casablanca and also have been active in Turkey. One of them, Abdelatif Mourafik, wanted in the Casablanca bombings, was recently arrested in Turkey.
I didn't know about that. Makes sense, though. I've been calling Zarqawi the real, genuine Qaeda operations chief.
Turkey is an ideal target for al-Qaeda: an overwhelmingly secular Muslim nation that is allied with the United States and Israel. Its size, location and Muslim population also make it an attractive place to operate. "You can hide without hiding," Levitt said.
If the Turks are true to form, it's going to become a lot less comfortable for Bad Guys to hang out in the near future.
Adel al-Jubeir, the foreign-affairs adviser to Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, describes al-Qaeda's worldwide operation as "a loose federation." The group may be in loose contact with the senior leadership through coded Internet messages or by courier. Cells are often no more than eight to 10 people, each with a specific assignment, such as driving or arranging financing.
That's what we've been seeing...
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#8  Martyr-cliches aside, the only thing worse than a dead martyr is an alive hero.

Not in the absence of any certainty one way or another. But the fact that bin Laden is no longer appearing in person to make his rants and deliver his condemnations as before indicates that something is obviously different. Nobody seems to know what the deal is, but more importantly, nobody seems to really care.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-11-22 10:37:11 PM  

#7  and then pull an Iranian Airbus incident on OBL's private jet on his commute between Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan/Pakistan.

Or book his flights with Air Ukraine and wait a month or two...
Posted by: Raj   2003-11-22 4:00:47 PM  

#6  the guy who's constantly managing to avoid US efforts to capture him

Aris and I are in agreement (or, has hell frozen over? :))
Posted by: Rafael   2003-11-22 2:08:23 PM  

#5  Now Binny is viewed as a guy on the run who is too scared to show his face - even on video tape.

Now Binny is viewed (same as Saddam) as the guy who's constantly managing to avoid US efforts to capture him, even as he manages to strike back at western (or secular Muslim) targets.

If CIA knows he's dead, for god's sake, *reveal* it. Martyr-cliches aside, the only thing worse than a dead martyr is an alive hero.

Why do you think that the former would inspire any more than the latter?

Now the *best* possible scenario would be a captured Osama Bin Laden, revealing himself a coward pleading for his life to the Americans by asking his former comrades to stop the fight. Most of the civil war with PKK in Turkey ended when captured Ocalan proved himself a wimp.

But if we can't have that, then a dead (and known-dead) Osama Bin Laden is the second-best choice.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris   2003-11-22 1:13:08 PM  

#4  Tancred wrote:
The CIA wants you to believe that OBL is alive. Why?

Assuming Binny is dead, the only possible use he is to al-Qaeda is as a martyr. I'm inclined to believe Binny is indeed dead and the CIA knows it. When al-Qaeda tried to save face by insisting Binny didn't die at Tora Bora, they gave the Americans the opportunity to prevent Binny from being made a great inspirational martyr figure. All the U.S. had to do was to say nothing. Now Binny is viewed as a guy on the run who is too scared to show his face - even on video tape.
Posted by: Biff Wellington   2003-11-22 11:33:14 AM  

#3  The CIA wants you to believe that OBL is alive. Why?

Uh, yeah. It's the CIA that says he's alive.

Maybe, outside of conspiracy theories, the CIA just can't say for sure that he's dead? After all, without a body, and with even the pathetic tapes being produced now, the press would be going apeshit if the government claimed bin Laden was dead.

Not to mention that you'd probably be asking why, in the face of all those tapes, the CIA insists he's dead.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-11-22 11:09:24 AM  

#2  During the war in Afghanistan OBLadin prepared scores of casettes that were played in mosques throughout Saudi Arabia. When that war was finished he returned for a time to Saudi Arabia where he preached in mosques, before heading to Yemen to assist in the civil war in that country. After he moved to Sudan in 1991 he gave numerous lectures to his AQ followers, was constantly on the radio and then the cellphone with allies throughout the world. After leaving Sudan in 1996 he appeared on numerous tapes, continued his daily contact with friends, etc. Then following Tora Bora, nothing. Scratchy tapes that a Swiss outfit claims are not the voice of OBL. He is seen here and there by con-man Mansoor Ijaz's personal intelligence service, but... no tapes, even though they would be easy to make. No calls. No pictures, although an idiot can run a camcorder. The CIA wants you to believe that OBL is alive. Why? Why would Woolsey join Ijaz and the Pakistani bser's Crescent Investment Management LLC?
Posted by: Tancred   2003-11-22 9:39:48 AM  

#1  Bin Laden is believed to have escaped a dragnet in Afghanistan and remains free and in charge

Damn we were close in Tora Bora. Sometimes I think going into Afghanistan was a mistake. Maybe the better tactic would have been to sit and wait and watch, and then pull an Iranian Airbus incident on OBL's private jet on his commute between Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan/Pakistan.
Posted by: Rafael   2003-11-22 8:15:23 AM  

00:00