You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraqi FM blasts U.N. - accuses eurotrash of "Settling scores with the United States"
2003-12-16
EFL
Adds flavor (some garlic, lots of salt, and several gallons of vinegar) to the previous post...
Iraq’s foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, accused the United Nations Security Council today of having failed to help rescue his country from Saddam Hussein, and he chided member states for bickering over his beleaguered country’s future.
And from the NYT, if you can believe it.
"Settling scores with the United States-led coalition should not be at the cost of helping to bring stability to the Iraqi people," Mr. Zebari said in language unusually scolding for an occupant of the guest seat at the end of the curving Security Council table. "Squabbling over political differences takes a back seat to the daily struggle for security, jobs, basic freedoms and all the rights the U.N. is chartered to uphold," he said.
"You guys can sit here in the international bathroom exploring your sexuality. We've got things to do."
Taking a harsh view of the inability of quarreling members of the Security Council to endorse military action in Iraq, Mr. Zebari said, "One year ago, the Security Council was divided between those who wanted to appease Saddam Hussein and those who wanted to hold him accountable. The United Nations as an organization failed to help rescue the Iraqi people from a murderous tyranny that lasted over 35 years, and today we are unearthing thousands of victims in horrifying testament to that failure." He declared, "The U.N. must not fail the Iraqi people again."
Kind of an argument against any deep UN involvement in the political end of rebuilding, I'd say.
It was not immediately clear how the accusatory tone of Mr. Zebari’s speech affected the closed-door discussion over the United Nations’ role in Iraq that followed, but Secretary General Kofi Annan, the first to emerge from the hall, appeared taken aback. "Now is not the time to pin blame and point fingers," he told reporters.
Well, when is the time to point fingers, dammit?
Saying that Mr. Zebari was "obviously entitled to his opinion," Mr. Annan said that the United Nations had done as much for Iraq as it could under the circumstances and was prepared to do more.
"I mean, we ignored, we procrastinated, we obfuscated. What more did he want?"
"Quite honestly," he said, "now is not the time to hurl accusations and counter-accusations."
"That can be done... ummm... some other time."
He also took on countries like France that have expressed doubts about the current governing group. "As Iraqis," he said, "we strongly disagree with those of you that question the legitimacy of the present Iraqi authorities." He continued: "I’d like to remind you that the governing council is the most representative and democratic governing body in the region. The members of the Security Council should be reaching out and encouraging this nascent democracy in a region well known for its authoritarian rule."
Think about that. A government appointed by an army of occupation is the closest they can come to democracy in the entire region.
Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere of France, a critic of the war, turned aside the criticism of the Security Council dissenters, saying, "I don’t want to comment on the past."
I love it, let those bastards have it with both barrels. Of course, the sniveling french can only whine about ’bygones’, nothing unexpected there. Hope kofi got an earful from the guy. I love how he goes after them for not considering the IGC ’legimate’, I hope he took the opportunity to remind the french how much they miss saddam.
Posted by:4thInfVet

#13  Unfortunately, Annan's term isn't up until 2006. This is his second term . . . how did THAT happen?!?
Posted by: spiffo   2003-12-16 11:37:25 PM  

#12  Two posts based on two reporters at the same meeting, and I saw yet a third one, about to post until I saw it already posted twice. Now I'm posting a fourth one here. The Beeb quoted no one so they could devote the whole thing to spin: (EFL, but short to begin with)
UN chief demands clear Iraq role
The United Nations role in Iraq needs to be defined much more clearly, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan says. Mr Annan said the capture of Saddam Hussein was an opportunity for a new beginning for Iraqis - and forming a provisional government was a priority. Mr Annan was addressing the UN Security Council during a debate on the future of Iraq. Mr Annan said the UN had not disengaged from Iraq despite appearances and was doing all it could from outside the country. But he said it was still too dangerous for the UN to return to Iraq, following the bombing of its Baghdad headquarters in August that killed UN envoy Sergio Vieira de Mello and 21 others. Mr Annan said the UN was ready to play its full part in helping Iraq from out of mortar range, but "much greater clarity" was needed as to what was expected from it.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-16 10:57:52 PM  

#11  Well, when is the time to point fingers, dammit?

Exactly. The monster has been dragged from his hole, the recovery of the country is under way (in spite of the idiots with RPGs). When will it be a better time to point some fingers at france and the u.n. than right now? ESPECIALLY considering their duplicity in keeping saddam in charge of the plastic shredders.


ps. thanks for the salt n' vinegar seasoning, FP.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2003-12-16 10:24:36 PM  

#10  That would be 'no'...
Posted by: Raj   2003-12-16 10:18:38 PM  

#9  did ANYONE see this speech on the news ? ANY news ? ANYWHERE ?
Posted by: eyeyeye   2003-12-16 9:36:53 PM  

#8  I think the IGC should sue the UN (possible?), and Kofi personally, to account for every dime of the "Oil for Palaces" program. Hit 'em where it hurts.
Posted by: PBMcL   2003-12-16 9:34:47 PM  

#7  Sounds like in Mr. Zebari we've identified the first Iraqi Rantburger. Somebody send him the URL.

" Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere of France, a critic of the war, turned aside the criticism... saying 'I don't want to comment on the past.'" Good idea, Jean-boy, it's not very pretty from your point of view.
Posted by: Matt   2003-12-16 9:33:31 PM  

#6  "Now is not the time...blah, blah, blah." It will never be the right time, will it, Kofi? Anybody know when this idiot's term is up? (I know, I know - we just get a new idiot. But this one's reeeeeeally worn out his welcome.)
Posted by: PBMcL   2003-12-16 9:07:13 PM  

#5  Methinks we're going to be hearing a lot more from Iraqi's who've been shafted over the years by the UN, NGO's and certain countries.

Good for them!
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2003-12-16 8:49:30 PM  

#4  Hoshyar Zebari delivered an excellent spanking to a group that richly deserved one.
Posted by: Dave D.   2003-12-16 8:48:12 PM  

#3  No, B, the first failure was the recognition and support of Saddam's government. The again would be if the UN abandons Iraq and treats it as if it's America's sole problem.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-12-16 8:36:08 PM  

#2  He declared, "The U.N. must not fail the Iraqi people again."

again?

Jeesh. Soooo... there will be a next time. No wonder the NYT is printing it.
Posted by: B   2003-12-16 8:24:23 PM  

#1  Shit, dupe post. Can you kill it Mr. Fred?
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2003-12-16 8:09:46 PM  

00:00