You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Egon's sprung
2003-12-19
East Germany's last communist leader, Egon Krenz, who was jailed for the state's shoot-to-kill policy against people who tried to flee to the West, has won early release after nearly four years in prison. Krenz, 66, had been serving a six-and-a-half-year term since January 2000 for his responsibility in the deaths of four dissidents who attempted to breach the Iron Curtain. "It is not an amnesty and not a pardon, we didn't want that," his attorney Robert Unger said. Krenz consistently claimed that he had been a victim of "victors' justice" in reunified Germany and was convicted as a stand-in for the East German regime as a whole.
That kinda seems the case to me. TGA may have a different opinion. I thought EGer went under because Egon was human enough not to roll over the protesters with tanks, like Honecker would have done. Not a great man, but not evil.
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#5  I can only guess: But the fact is that so many ministeries were stormed makes me suspicious. I guess lots of Baathists used (or even instigated) lootings to burn as many documents as possible. The Stasi "stormed" the building in Normannenstrasse along with the protestors and while the protestors tore apart any paper the Stasi destroyed what was really important. They knew where to look for it. Many armoured safes were opened without violence.

And I suppose that despite the tumbling of statues many Baghdadis weren't so sure about the end of the Baathist regime. And compared to Basra Baghdadis lived rather ok with the Baathists while people in Basra hated them with passion.

In Basra the Baathists were the oppressors from outside, in Baghdad the front was less defined. From what I heard scores are being settled in Baghdad, too, and quite a few robberies and murders are in fact assassinations.
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-12-19 2:55:40 PM  

#4  TGA, what is your take on why there was massive looting after the fall of Baghdad but only isolated assasination of Baathists? I understand that there were plenty of assinations in Basra after Kuwait was liberated.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-19 2:32:00 PM  

#3  I kinda disagree, Fred. Egon wasn't "human" enough (the Stasi had the concentration camps already set up), he was just overwhelmed and Gorbachev had made it very clear that the Soviets would provide no help.

If they wanted to crush the protesters they missed the right time anyway. Once you have one million in Leipzig tanks won't help you anymore.

Krenz was not human, he was just clueless. Oh well, who cares.

He bears responsibility for the people killed at the Iron Curtain but at that time the guys who controlled everything were the Soviets. Krenz (and Honecker) would not have sneezed without Soviet permission.

Krenz has tried to glorify himself by saying that he didn't want to kill thousands. How pathetic is that?

Especially if the thousands would probably have killed him in the end. After violent repression (without Soviet backup) East Germans could very well have "pulled a Ceausescu" on Krenz and Honecker.
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-12-19 1:37:48 PM  

#2  Image of editorial cartoon, timely a decade-odd back: Outline map of Germany (E and W) with Wall between. To the west, crowded with heads. To the east, emptiness except ladders laid up against the Wall. Comment rising:
Well, we achieved German reunification, but not quite the way we intended.
But the Germans are still wrestling with this, socially and economically, and will for another generation or so. Don't let 'em kid you.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-19 2:36:51 AM  

#1  Wasn't Egon Krenz one of the Ghostbusters?
Posted by: Pete Stanley   2003-12-19 2:22:41 AM  

00:00