You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: East
Sudan shuts down al-Jazeera, arrests bureau chief
2003-12-19
The Sudanese authorities on Thursday decided to close Aljazeera’s bureau in Khartoum without giving any reason and arrested Islam Salih, the bureau chief. Minutes before his arrest, Salih informed his head office in Qatar that the authorities had decided to close the Aljazeera office. He quoted the Sudanese security forces to this effect.
"Oh, man! I really dunnit this time! They're comin' for me, Maw! They're comin' for me!"
On Wednesday, the office was were raided by the security forces and Salih taken in for questioning. Broadcasting equipment was confiscated despite production of legal documents and permits.
"Just a matter of paperwork, y'understand."
"Then why'd that guy hit me? Ow!"
Salih had recently received threats from the security forces over Aljazeera’s political coverage of Sudan. The channel, whose motto is "The opinion and the counter opinion", had given government and opposition figures a platform when reporting on the country.
You can't do that! It's un-Islamic!
Human rights organisations have often condemned Sudan for cracking down on freedom of expression. In its 2003 report on Sudan, Amnesty International said security forces continued to limit media freedoms. Amnesty added that authorities unlawfully arrested journalists and editors and fined or suspended newspapers. Sanctions were also imposed for publishing articles critical of the government.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#5  In real life I've said, "Our perspectives are altered by our viewpoints," often enough to piss everyone off. Al-Jazeera prides itself on editorial independence. They are also notorious for stepping on Arab toes. We might not see it that way, but from the 7th-century view, al-J might not be jihadi enough. They want a more unbiased Arabic news source, e. g., something more BBC-like.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-19 3:13:01 PM  

#4   That'd be my guess. The thing with the Sudanese NIF government is that they have some fairly bloody turf battles behind the scenes and if al-Jazeera let the word out that one was going on (over say, the best way to perpetrate genocide in Darfur) or backed the wrong side the winners probably jugged them.
Posted by: Dan Darling   2003-12-19 1:10:55 PM  

#3  Dan, I don't get this one. In Sudan I thought the government was the jihadi's. Is this an unlikely example of Al Jeezera being surpressed for being fair and balanced instead of just being a mouthpiece for AQ?
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-19 11:31:29 AM  

#2  Yeah it is, but you gotta remember. To the left, the Sudanese are just wogs, who have no notion of free press and democratic values.

The left won't complain, because they are just wogs. We won't complain, because it is probably due to Al Jazeera's perchants for prostylizing the jihadi cause.
Posted by: Ben   2003-12-19 5:35:57 AM  

#1  If we did this in Iraq, everyone would throw a fit. But Sudan, murderer of Christians, get a free pass most likely. Double standard in it's purest form.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-12-19 2:52:42 AM  

00:00