You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Fifth Column
Canadians for Clark really just Canadians for Clark
2003-12-19
Much back pedaling by the website set up to look like Canadians were coming out in force for Clark.
CanadaForClark.com does not represent the opinions of an organization, or an entire country. CFC is a personal blog expressing the opinion of one individual, and anyone that may choose to agree with him or her!

1) Nothing we have done is illegal (it was moveon.org’s past policy to accept international donations, not ours), and it is doubtful that our link has led to a single donation,
2) Wesley Clark and his campaign have absolutely nothing to do with this website, and
3) Canada is not a Communist nation.
heh, heh.... Who's we? This one backfired under a bright light. Someone wants to put Clark up front and center, but I seriously doubt he is backed by even small numbers of lefties. I think someone in DNC thinks that Clark is useful..but I’m not sure exactly why. While this could be just one man’s blog, it seems a bit odd for a Canadian individual to take the time to set this up when he can’t even vote in the US. Odd.
Posted by:B

#6  Unlike Mexicans, when did Canadians start voting in American elections?
Posted by: ed   2003-12-20 3:33:35 PM  

#5  Maybe it's Ashleigh Bamfield's blog.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-19 10:20:04 PM  

#4  I have never met a Canadian that would want someone like Clark in charge in the US. The conservatives would be satisfied with Bush's track record. The liberal Canadians would be scared of his uniform and might think Dean was too right wing.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-19 10:18:36 PM  

#3  make that one, lone, schizophrenic, gender confused guy with his pants around his/her ankles.

In light of his attempts to hide his identity behind "him or her", and the addition of "we" and "our link" to spread any incoming blame, I'm going with the cash and carry angle. Conspiracy theories are much more fun.

It's all just so Clintonian, is it not? The confused pronouns and the penchant for using foreign campaign contributions.
Posted by: B   2003-12-19 2:12:41 PM  

#2  Yeah. One guy with his pants around his ankles.
Posted by: Scott   2003-12-19 2:01:10 PM  

#1  I think someone in DNC thinks that Clark is useful..

That would be Terry McAuliffe / the Clintons, who effectively control the DNC until Dean or whoever the Donk nomination 'selects', not elects, and cleans house.

I'd speculate even money odds on the lone gunman blogger theory or someone (insert conspiracy theory here) paid him to do it, cash and carry.
Posted by: Raj   2003-12-19 1:37:59 PM  

00:00