You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
Singapore wants pirates treated like terrorists
2003-12-23
Pirates roaming the waters of Southeast Asia should be regarded as terrorists, Singapore’s Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng said amid a rising number of attacks on ships and tankers. Wong told AFP in an interview last week there should be no distinction between pirates operating for personal gain and terrorists, with the motives of anonymous attackers impossible to judge until they are caught.
He means if the results are the same, the motivations don't matter. Interesting legal theory, ain't it?
"Although we talk about piracy or anti-piracy, if there’s a crime conducted at sea sometimes we do not know whether it’s pirates or terrorists who occupy the ship so we have to treat them all alike," he said.
"Mr. Ibrahim! Get a rope!"
"Aye aye, Cap'n!"
"So in other words if it’s piracy we treat it just like terrorism because it is difficult to identify the culprits concerned unless you board the ship." Wong was speaking in the context of the growing piracy menace in Southeast Asia, with the threat particularly high in the waters between Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines.
Defined, I believe, as the "most dangerous waters in the world."
The region is also home to a range of Islamic terrorist and militant organisations, including the Jemaah Islamiyah groupand the Abu Sayyaf kidnapping gang of the Philippines. The London-based International Maritime Bureau, an industry watchdog, recently warned Indonesia’s waters were the most piracy-prone in the world, with 87 incidents in the first nine months of this year resulting in 85 people being kidnapped and two killed.
"Martha! Cancel the cruise tickets, will you? We're going to the Grand Canyon."
It last month detailed a range of piracy attacks in the region, including the hijacking of an Indian-registered tanker off Indonesia’s Bintan island, which is about an hour’s sailing time from Singapore. And a Singapore-owned tugboat, hijacked on September 19 while sailing from the city-state to Indonesia, was found more than a month later off Malaysia’s northern Penang state. In his interview with AFP, Wong warned of the danger of an incident that initially looked like a piracy incident escalating into a terrorist attack. "Terrorism camouflaged as piracy. That’s a bigger concern for us than just simple piracy," he said, giving an example of assailants boarding a ship laden with liquid gas and sailing it into their target.
That'd make a bigger boom than I'd want to see...
The International Maritime Board also reported last year an unusually high number of tugboats being hijacked and analysts have warned terrorists could load them with explosives to ram into ships or ports. The Straits of Malacca, which form the busiest shipping line in the world and run between Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, rank number one on regional authorities’ lists of maritime piracy and terrorism concerns. The 1,000-kilometre-long (630-mile) straits are very narrow but link the Indian Ocean to the South China Sea and the Pacific, making them a tempting chokepoint for terrorists wanting to disrupt world trade. Indonesia and Singapore agreed on Friday to strengthen their efforts in combatting the maritime security threat in the Malacca Straits. Wong said Singapore had also introduced, or was implementing, many measures on its own to deal with maritime security threats, including investing 840 million US dollars on a global satellite-based ship identification system. He said the tracking of vessels and who was on them needed to be as accurate as in the aviation industry. "When you look at an aircraft coming in you know what the aircraft is, where exactly it is now and where it is heading," he said.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#7  The principle of a BLEVE, or Boiling Liquid Explosive Vapor Explosion would apply. If the tank were ruptured by a small metal-penetrating charge, and a fire resulted on the surface of the tank that started heating the tank, eventually, the contents of the tank boil, which exceeds the structural integrity of the tank as a whole, and the major rupture then releases super-pressurized boiling liquid fuel into the fire.

The BLEVE effect in a tank as small as a railcar has killed people at over a half mile from the explosion. The fuel-air scenario is almost as devastating. The Russians lost a passenger train full of people in the taiga a couple of years ago because of a blown gas well laying down a fuel cloud and causing a 5 kilometer fireball.

The BLEVE from a 3-tank LNG ship has already been modelled, and could EXCEED the explosion of a tactical nuclear weapon.
Posted by: Rivrdog   2003-12-23 2:58:33 PM  

#6  Jack is Back! - I heard a radio report yesterday that they (al-Q, whomever) were targeting a large LNG shipment into Boston Hahhbahh today, and that some people weren't going into the Financial District area because of that. Here's today's report on it.
Posted by: Raj   2003-12-23 12:59:32 PM  

#5  The Red Thingie has this to say:
... What made piracy an "international crime" was the fact that any state that gained custody of the perpetrator could try him, regardless of his or the victims' nationality, or of the place of the crime. This concept, now known as universal jurisdiction, has been more recently applied to genocide, certain war crimes and crimes against humanity.
They don't specifically mention "international terrorism" but I don't see that as much of a stretch. I believe generally international law has been interpreted that all nations have the right and responsibility to suppress piracy, etc(?) and that pirates, etc(?) are stateless, i. e., they have no rights to be respected. If you catch them, you just kill them. It's not like they're prisoners of war or anything.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-23 12:10:12 PM  

#4  Singapore wants pirates treated like terrorists

I say blow 'em out of the water with a well-placed shot.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-12-23 10:27:33 AM  

#3  JIB.... but the tank, would it be hard to breach the tank? Or is the tank subdivided?
Posted by: Shipman   2003-12-23 10:16:21 AM  

#2  You don't have to sit in Singapore to fantasize about that. Boston harbor contains an LNG receiver as does Cove Point about 60 miles SE of DC on the Chessie. However, it would be a real task to get through all the EM controls, overrides, computer safes and so forth to release any of the LNG which is cryogenic and sealed in big old thermos' (that is those 3 big balls on the deck). Then of course once the pressure and temp are reduced and increase respectively, it vaporizes back to gas. But there is the risk albeit, nanoscule, that it could just go poof one day due to some EM failure. All of that LNG is headed from Arun on Aceh province (we know about those guys, right)to Korea and Japan.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2003-12-23 8:37:14 AM  

#1  I used to have an office over-looking the straits of Singapore and those Liquified Natural Gas bulk carriers came through regular as clockwork every day. I never counted them but there were a number each day. I used to phantasize about making a movie, in which one of them gets highjacked and they stop it in the middle of the straits, where there always a hundred plus cargo ships waiting their turn at the port not to mention an urban density along the shore similar to the Manhattan shore line. The terrorrists then turn on the taps or just blow the pressured containers and I believe LNG is heavier than air so will roll out across the water forming a blanket. Light to non-existent winds are the norm in the area. LNG meets at some point a naked flame and one hell of a scary scenario.

I don't doubt the Singapore governement has run this scenario and would have a response, but I doubt whether they could actually stop it.
Posted by: phil_b   2003-12-23 2:14:03 AM  

00:00