You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: North
Libya accuses Pak scientists of selling N-plans
2004-01-05
The heir son of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi has revealed that Libya bought plans to make a nuclear bomb from Pakistani scientists as part of the quest for weapons of mass destruction it has now promised to abandon, write Michael Sheridan and Marie Colvin in The Sunday Times.
Looking worse for Pakistan.
Saif al-Islam Gaddafi said Libya had spent at least $40 million trying to build the bomb - an effort that Western weapon inspectors believe came much closer to fruition than previously thought. Revelations of the extent of Pakistani involvement are expected to increase US and British pressure on President Pervez Musharraf, who already stands accused of failing to prevent the illicit sale of nuclear material to Iran. Pakistan admitted last week that “rogue scientists” might have peddled technology for individual gain. It said several had been questioned.
Wonder when their "car accidents" are scheduled?
In an interview on his farm east of Tripoli, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, 32, confirmed that Libya used a network of international middlemen to buy nuclear components, including centrifuges, on the black market. Some of the material came from Malaysia and other Asian countries while other components were bought in South Africa.
Those centrifuges that were seized by the US and Britian had phoney shipping documents from a "asian" company.
Dressed in traditional gold silk Libyan robes and a checked turban, he spoke excitedly of a “new page in Libya’s history” and revealed how he had worked as a “trouble shooter” in talks with US and British officials that culminated in Colonel Gaddafi’s pre-Christmas offer to dismantle Libya’s weapons of mass destruction programs. “I was able to take messages to my father and explain to him. By the end we had a good relationship with the CIA, MI6 and all the Americans and British,” he said.
Meet the next ruler of Libya.
And probably a more capable one than his father, despite his propensity for checked turbans...
His father had needed to be reassured that the Americans and British did not have a hidden agenda for regime change in Tripoli. “Once they assured us they did not, everything went forward.”
Our agenda wasn’t hidden, it was right out in the open.
We're flexible: reform or regime change. Take your pick...
It also emerged at the weekend that Libya appeared to have begun the process of enriching uranium, indicating Colonel Gaddafi was much closer to making a nuclear device than the UN inspectors admitted had been thought. According to one Western diplomat based in Tripoli, British and American experts who inspected Libyan weapons sites were startled to discover how advanced the nuclear program was. Libya had a “uranium enrichment program actually in progress”, the diplomat said. The experts were also taken aback to find that Colonel Gaddafi’s nuclear scientists had what one Western official described as a “full bomb dossier” from the Pakistanis.
This Libyan deal is looking better all the time.
It's a work of diplomatic genius...
Posted by:Steve

#9  Insurmountable problems? Like the ones that were solved by us with 1940s technology?
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-5 11:38:55 PM  

#8  I'd be surprised if we hadn't been watching that all along.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-1-5 3:46:55 PM  

#7  I don't see how it could be a bad thing for Bush, at least if people think about it rationally.

Not embarrassing, to be sure, but more along the lines of having yet another blip on the radar screen to have to watch. Pakis involved with Khadafy, with NK, and possibly Iran, is rather troubing, to say the least.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-5 3:38:44 PM  

#6  Based on Gregg Easterbrook's article in the NYT yesterday (the almost insurmountable technological problems in developing nuclear weapons), one could be forgiven for thinking Pakistan was actually running a high level Nigerian e-mail scam; lots of promises and money change hands but no functional results. Ghadaffi just discovered he has been had.
Posted by: john   2004-1-5 2:50:56 PM  

#5  I don't see how it could be a bad thing for Bush, at least if people think about it rationally. Remember, one of the particular accusations made against Bush during the 2000 campaign was that he didn't even know the name of the president of Pakistan! Hard to blame Bush for something his own opponents claim he was ignorant of.

For Musharraf, I don't think it makes a big difference. The only people who might change their minds about him are the US, and I doubt we want to abandon him and roll the dice on his replacement.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-1-5 1:29:54 PM  

#4  Them Pakis are turning out to have connections with a lot of unsavory situations. This certainly can't be good news, for either Musharraf or GWB.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-5 12:08:38 PM  

#3  Um, Malaysia and Pakistan are clearly in Asia. What makes you think "asian/Asia includes people of the ME"?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-1-5 11:05:05 AM  

#2  Now that "asian/Asia" includes people of the ME, I really wonder where these ships are stopping.
Posted by: Anonymous2u   2004-1-5 10:56:21 AM  

#1  The only theory that adequately explains the actions and effectiveness of the IAEA is that they are actively covering up the nuclear programs of third-world nations. They have certainly done nothing to stop any of them, and whenever the US uncovers details about one, it turns out to be much, much larger than the IAEA admitted.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-1-5 10:51:51 AM  

00:00