You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
NATO nations sign up for sealift
2004-01-16
Nine NATO nations have signed an accord giving them access to an on-call strategic sealift capacity for rapid deployment forces. Canada, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the UK signed the Multinational Implementation Agreement on sealift at NATO Headquarters in Brussels on 1 December 2003 under the lead of Norwegian Defence Minister Kristin Krohn Devold.
she has been doing good work
Norway leads the High Level Group on Strategic Sealift established at the Prague Summit in November 2002 to address the shortfall in strategic sealift across the alliance. NATO had identified a shortfall in military sealift capability for its rapid deployment forces equivalent to 12-14 medium-size roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) vessels. In reflection of this capability gap, strategic sealift was promoted as a multinational capability project at the Prague Summit, having earlier been one of a number of so-called Defence Capabilities Initiatives. The NATO strategic sealift service will comprise a combination of full-time charter and multinational assured access contracts. NATO’s Maintenance and Supply Agency is contracting authority on behalf of the partner nations. The nine nations have initially agreed to acquire a multinational capability package of five Ro-Ro ships, with 2004 planned as a trial year. The aim is to incrementally develop further capacity for subsequent years based on the experience gained during the first 12 months of operation. To ensure effective use of the overall strategic sealift capacity, the partner nations will utilise the services of the Sealift Co-ordination Centre (SCC) at Eindhoven. The SCC was established on a permanent basis on 1 September 2003 under an agreement between the Netherlands, Norway and the UK.
Posted by:rkb

#5  The Brits did pretty good power projection in the S.A. war... but they did most of it over the beach..... so yeah Port Said?
Posted by: Shipman   2004-1-16 7:43:41 PM  

#4  Shipman, too true, however when was the last time NATO had to capture a hostile port? (not counting the US and UK).


I would guess when the UK and France went into the Sinai in '56? Though the UK was involved...

Maybe have to go back to Germany in WW2 and the invasion of Norway?
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2004-1-16 5:38:52 PM  

#3  Shipman, too true, however when was the last time NATO had to capture a hostile port? (not counting the US and UK).
Posted by: Val   2004-1-16 5:32:41 PM  

#2   To RO off you either assume 1)friendly port available or 2)airborne troops can capture port relatively intact.If you believe all your troops will be needed for is "peacekeeping" or intervention in militarily insignificant Third World countries,assuptions 1&2 make sense.
Posted by: Stephen   2004-1-16 4:59:41 PM  

#1  Never understood the RoRo thing. I can see that it's damned handy for some places, but what happens if you can RO on... but not RO off. Good for follow on but for serious over-the-beach power projection they are useless targets.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-1-16 3:45:30 PM  

00:00