You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
Comstock -Prez Calls Dems Patriot Games Bluff
2004-01-23
EFL from NRO
Taking on demagoguery.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday night, President George W. Bush called the bluff of Patriot Act critics. Bush pointed out that key provisions of the Patriot Act will expire next year, while "the terrorist threat will not expire on that schedule," and he challenged Congress to renew this important antiterrorism measure.

You gotta love a president who is not going to seek a permission slip to protect the American people, especially when compared to the Democratic presidential contenders, who check with the ACLU before defending American security. Their attacks on the Patriot Act are straight from Planet Kucinich — incidentally, the only presidential candidate who actually voted against the Patriot Act in Congress.

The president explained during his address that the Patriot Act was one of those "essential tools" which allow federal law enforcement "to better share information, to track terrorists, to disrupt their cells, and to seize their assets." The bill passed in October 2001 with only one senator voting against it and with the support of 83 percent of the House of Representatives.

As the president pointed out, the law-enforcement methods outlined in the Patriot Act have been used for years to go after drug traffickers and mobsters, and are even "more important for hunting terrorists." He could have been quoting Senator Joe Biden (D., Del.), who said at the time of the bill’s passage, "[T]he FBI could get a wiretap to investigate the mafia, but they could not get one to investigate terrorists. To put it bluntly, that was crazy! What’s good for the mob should be good for terrorists."
Snip DNC positions- Pro comments by Lieberman, Biden and Feinstien. Con comments by Kerry, Edwards and Clark.

I am conservative but I speculate that from a DNC standpoint that fewer debates the better. Without debates the DNC can trot out Pelosi and Daschle to vocalize unpopular opinions. With debates the Dems are forced to address issues that GW drives into the public forum. The State of the Union address was an effective tool to define the debate; the recess appointment of Pickering was another example.
Posted by:Super Hose

#2  That was a classic from the SOTU, it was almost Reaganesse in it's deliver. The Radcial Dems all dived for that bait! TOO FUNNY!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2004-1-23 11:49:45 AM  

#1  You gotta love a president who is not going to seek a permission slip to protect the American people, especially when compared to the Democratic presidential contenders, who check with the ACLU before defending American security.

Not just the ACLU, but foreign entities as well.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-23 11:45:19 AM  

00:00