You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front
Federal judge rules part of Patriot Act unconstitutional
2004-01-26
EFL
For the first time, a federal judge has declared unconstitutional a very small section of the USA Patriot Act that bars giving expert advice or assistance to groups designated foreign terrorist organizations. In a ruling handed down late Friday and made available today, U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins said the ban is impermissibly vague in its wording. The U.S. Justice Department is reviewing the ruling, spokesman Mark Corallo said in a statement from Washington. Corallo called the Patriot Act — the federal anti-terrorism statute passed in the aftermath of Sept. 11 — "an essential tool in the war on terror" and asserted that the portion at issue in the ruling was only a modest amendment to a pre-existing anti-terrorism law.

David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who argued the case on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project, declared the ruling "a victory for everyone who believes the war on terrorism ought to be fought consistent with constitutional principles." The case before the court involved five groups and two U.S. citizens seeking to provide support for lawful, nonviolent activities on behalf of Kurdish refugees in Turkey. The Humanitarian Law Project said the plaintiffs were threatened with 15 years in prison if they advised groups on seeking a peaceful resolution of the Kurds’ campaign for self-determination in Turkey. The judge’s ruling said the law, as written, does not differentiate between impermissible advice on violence and encouraging the use of peaceful, nonviolent means to achieve goals.
Probably because there is no way to differentiate between the two. What the U.N. and EU consider peaceful (i.e. bombing and murdering innocent people in buses in Israel) I call violent (among other things).
"The USA Patriot Act places no limitation on the type of expert advice and assistance which is prohibited and instead bans the provision of all expert advice and assistance regardless of its nature," the judge said. The ruling specified that the plaintiffs seek to provide support to "the lawful, nonviolent activities" of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, an advocate group
advocate group?
for the Tamil people in Sri Lanka. Both groups are on a list issued by former Secretary of State Madeline Albright in 1997 of "foreign terrorist organizations." In Sri Lanka, the Tamil Tiger rebels have been engaged in a two-decade civil war that has killed more than 65,000 people.
This fits the definition of ’non-violence’?
Turkey’s military has been battling Kurdish rebels seeking autonomy since 1984, a fight that has left some 37,000 people dead.
Posted by:CrazyFool

#2  The Constitution is not a suicide pact. No, Mr. Cole, I believe should be fought to win.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-26 11:39:57 PM  

#1  So if you give support to the 'civilian' side of Hamas or Hizbollah,that's OK?Is that it?
Posted by: El Id   2004-1-26 8:50:19 PM  

00:00