You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Can John Kerry hold on to his lead?
2004-02-12
ELF
Very interestiiiiing. Read the last few paragraphs
Harold Wilson, that British politician more canny than admired, usefully reminded his audience that things can change very quickly in politics. "A week is a long time," he said, in politics, and we have seen this over and over in the American scene these past months... The lanky and experienced Massachusetts senator has money to burn. No one wants to say it, but his wife’s near billion-dollar fortune at the very least permits him to spend all his own, more modest, fortune to smooth his way. She can’t shovel money directly into his campaign, but the mere fact of her fortune gives confidence to other contributors or lenders that they’re backing a winner. He has seemingly unlimited self-confidence, despite many trip-ups in his long career.
And now he has Tiffany...
But no senator has won the keys to the White House since John F. Kennedy. There’s a reason why senators don’t tend to win. They’ve been on the record for too long on too many issues. There are too many interest groups they have had to cultivate and satiate to stay in politics. Sam Nunn, a powerful senator from Georgia who didn’t even have to face serious re-election opposition, left the Senate in 1996 because he tired of spending his evenings entertaining his major supporters and running over to the Senate to vote. At the prime of life, he wanted to rediscover his family. The real issue that Kerry must resolve is, however, character. Now that he is the front-runner, he must not only answer to all the charges of serving special interests that have risen and will still rise, he has to satisfy the public that he is, not to put too fine a point on it, an honorable man. There are questions.
Question: "What's her name, Senator?"
Question: "Is she double-jointed?"
Question: "Is she, like, into Jolly Green Giant cream corn sessions?"
Kerry has managed to straddle
...(an unfortunate choice of terminology today)...
many issues and so it is difficult to discern his real beliefs -- other than in himself. He votes for the war in Iraq so he doesn’t look "wet" and then votes against Pentagon budget rises, so he can please the liberal Democrats, who give him one of their highest ratings. When he looks at an acquaintance, he always seems to be looking just past, to see if someone more important lurks behind his interlocutor.
Either that, or he's trying to imagine what they look like nekkid...
Of course that’s just standard politics. But people want something more. He now makes much of his decorations from the war in Vietnam, to appeal to centrists and conservatives, without reminding those audiences that he for long was a leader of Vietnam veterans against the war. Indeed, assiduous searchers, looking for his vulnerabilities, will find much of interest in that period of his life. For example, the fabled and distinguished chief of naval operations (CNO), Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, told me -- 30 years ago when he was still CNO -- that during his own command of US naval forces in Vietnam, just prior to his anointment as CNO, young Kerry had created great problems for him and the other top brass, by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets. "We had virtually to straight-jacket him to keep him under control," the admiral said. "Bud" Zumwalt got it right when he assessed Kerry as having large ambitions -- but promised that his career in Vietnam would haunt him if he were ever on the national stage.
Wonder if that conversation's on tape?
It is that sort of thing that senators don’t have to worry about. But if they become a front-runner for president, the whole ball-game changes. Their past is scrutinized with a fine-tooth comb. In Kerry’s case, for example, he has shown precious little interest in Asia since his tour in Vietnam, and there is little doubt that he will follow the standard Democratic party, pro-Beijing, line. But every word he’s ever spoken on it will be scrutinized. That is why it is not only true that a week is a long time in politics. But, as they say in American politics, "It ain’t over until the fat lady sings."
Is she gonna sing "Norwegian Wood" this time?
Posted by:tipper

#10  Excellent post Tipper, coffee up my nose, shirt, pants, desk, dripping down monitor.

Like if Tiffany and Monica ever do, you know...together?
Posted by: john   2004-2-12 9:29:09 PM  

#9  Is she gonna sing "Norwegian Wood" this time
Funny for you maybe, but I grew up thinking a Sitar was a Scandinavian guitar... when I learned the truth it was to late... I was OP deaf.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-2-12 5:47:24 PM  

#8  DM1, I think what B is trying to say is vote for Kerry to get the dem nomination so that Bush can crush him in November. However, I don't think it matters who the dems pick, Dean - whacko, Edwards - too inexperienced and prolly couldn't win his seat back in NC according to my friends up there. Kucinich/Sharpton - bwhahahaha.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-2-12 1:37:33 PM  

#7  young Kerry had created great problems for him and the other top brass, by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets.

Hmm.... interesting..... Is there any documentation of Kerry's Civilian kills during his 'honorable' service in Nam?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-2-12 12:24:02 PM  

#6  You gotta be serious. A man who dishonored his country and his uniform with his anti war activities. Aiding and comforting the enemy. I'd rather seen him thrown in jail for the traitor he is to his country and his flag.
Posted by: dataman1   2004-2-12 12:22:11 PM  

#5  dataman...it doesn't matter - get your rear end off that chair and go vote for Kerry!! Encourage all your friends to do the same. You got nothing to lose. Bush is the Republican nominee, regardless.

Kerry is a slam dunk loser. Now get on down to your local primary and VOTE FOR KERRY!!
Posted by: B   2004-2-12 12:05:12 PM  

#4  Well as you may know "we in the states" aren't all Dimmycrats. Besides the great majority of us are war mongering imperailists who think Allah is a homo and that the best solution to all the world's problems is to bomb them back to the stone age...In some cases since some may have not made the leap to stone age to something before it....As for Europeans, most of us could give a hoot less about what is thought of us over there or anywhere for that matter. I hope that answers your naive assertions about "we". Of course that is only my opinion.
Posted by: dataman1   2004-2-12 11:31:17 AM  

#3  all of you in states where the dem primary hasn't been held yet need to get out and vote for Kerry!
Posted by: B   2004-2-12 10:46:30 AM  

#2  I think the Dems are soon going to experience some major pangs of Buyer's Remorse over John Kerry: even if I were still a Democrat, and even if 9/11 had never happened, I don't think anyone could convince me to vote for this guy.

Dude, who stole my party???
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-2-12 10:44:20 AM  

#1  We had virtually to straight-jacket him to keep him under control

Are we talking about Bob or John?
Posted by: Shipman   2004-2-12 10:22:30 AM  

00:00