You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Al-Qaeda’s new leaders behind recent attacks
2004-02-13
Even as Osama bin Laden remains at large, Al Qaeda may be anointing new, younger leaders to carry on his cause. Some experts go so far as to call this coterie terrorism’s next generation. These men may be behind a recent wave of attacks in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Russia. Abu Musab Zarqawi, the main suspect in this week’s bombings in Baghdad, is but 37 years old. Most of this generation looked to Mr. bin Laden for inspiration, not direction. Most trained in Al Qaeda’s Afghanistan camps. Most are so devout they have memorized the Koran. They are better educated than their predecessors - and, as independent operators, they may be more difficult to control.

This new generation has emerged, government officials and outside terror experts say, as a result of both the success in prosecuting the war on terror and because of Mr. bin Laden’s planning for the future. Some two-thirds of the original Al Qaeda leadership has been captured or killed since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the US. And there’s no doubt, these sources say, that bin Laden and the remaining members of his top echelon are hiding and unable to easily communicate with their followers. But, they add, bin Laden knew this might happen. "What you are looking at is a second or third generation, but it’s a successor generation," says a senior intelligence official. "In an insurgency, which I think this is, you always have succession planning in order to survive. You always expect to lose leaders because you are fighting a more powerful opponent."

Among the new leaders, all a generation younger than bin Laden:
• The Jordanian Abu Musab Zarqawi is suspected of orchestrating this week’s suicide bombing attacks in Baghdad, in which some 100 Iraqis were killed. Mr. Zarqawi allegedly traveled to Afghanistan in the late 1980s, when he was 20 years old. He returned to Jordan in 1992, where he reportedly plotted to overthrow the monarchy. He was jailed for several years and apparently memorized the Koran while in prison - something many of these leaders have done.

• Saudi-born Abu Walid is believed to have taken the lead role in Chechnya’s rebel movement, according to US and Russian intelligence sources. They think he is behind the suicide bomb attack in a Moscow subway last week that killed some 40 people. He also trained in Afghanistan, specializing in explosives.

• Saudi Abdul Aziz Al-Muqrin is the suspected mastermind of the May and November suicide bomb attacks in Saudi Arabia, in which 53 people died, including nine Americans. Abdul Aziz al-Muqrin fits the same basic mold. He’s in his 30s, and he also traveled to Afghanistan when he was 17 for training and later joined the war in Bosnia. He, too, spent time in a Saudi prison, where he learned the Koran by heart.
THE new fighters are probably not as dynamic and swashbuckling as their former counterparts, jihadists who came of age during the early 1980s fighting the Soviets alongside bin Laden in Afghanistan. These recent attacks, for example, are much less spectacular than the 9/11 strikes. The younger acolytes, though, are believed to be at least as religiously zealous, better educated, more computer savvy, and better organization builders. "It shows Al Qaeda’s enduring attraction, at least to the constituency it’s directing its message toward," says Bruce Hoffman, a terror expert at the RAND Corp. in Washington. "Even despite the loss of Afghanistan, the call of jihad remains a compelling voice to this new generation of recruits populating the ranks."

All these fronts - Iraq and Chechnya, particularly, but also Saudi Arabia - are part of Al Qaeda’s original strategy, these officials and experts say. The attacks are not spectacular, as the 9/11 attacks were, but nonetheless are designed to wear down the resolve of the West. Moreover, they show how Al Qaeda has evolved over the past decade, becoming much less of a command-and-control operation and more ideologically driven. "For the first time we’re seeing the crystallization of the network in Iraq," says Mr. Hoffman. "What you see in Iraq is much more disparate.... They will form alliances with whoever is adopting their cause - even secular alliances with Baathist forces - and they will split apart afterward." The intelligence official concurs: "[bin Laden] wants to kill Americans and people who support Americans. They are putting a lot of effort into that."
Posted by:Dan Darling

#13  Not to mention that this war-mongering Administration has probably increased the number of Al Qaeda recruits by 400%

Not a problem. It simply means that 400% more jihadis can be dispatched. My choice for taking the added riffraff out would be a "Spooky" experience.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-2-13 1:35:51 PM  

#12  #7 & #9 didn't understand a word either of you wrote, but I like #7's handle: Henry E. Panky. Rock I don't dig, but hanky-panky I do understand. LOL
Posted by: GK   2004-2-13 11:26:29 AM  

#11  Q: Why do Jihadis hate us?
A: Because we are not them.
Posted by: eLarson   2004-2-13 11:07:47 AM  

#10  Better to kick the base boards and see if the roaches scurry,and easier to kill,NMM.
Posted by: Raptor   2004-2-13 9:51:00 AM  

#9  Henry, nice Zeppelin/Sabbath tie-in. Though a cock-rocker like myself would say that Beatles/Stones as first gen just prior to Zep (w/overlap of course) and Van Halen (w/DLR not Hagar) was good third gen. Poison/WSnake - actually decent musicians caught in a bad fashion era easily mocked by today's trendies who prolly had their albums as 10 yr old kids but deny it today. I.E. - how did they sell & all the other hair bands sell millions of albums and yet no one admits to having one?
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-2-13 8:59:10 AM  

#8  
What you see in Iraq is much more disparate.... They will form alliances with whoever is adopting their cause - even secular alliances with Baathist forces - and they will split apart afterward.

They'll have a huge problem with infiltrators, turncoats and heretics.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-2-13 8:28:21 AM  

#7  Second generation is always dumber and sloppier and fails to inspire a third generation. First you get Zeppelin and Black Sabbath, then you get posers like Poison and Whitesnake. Third time you get 'piss-off, blokes' and something new like Sex Pistols.
Posted by: Henry E. Pankey   2004-2-13 8:25:40 AM  

#6  They would hate us anyway and what's not to say recruitment would not go up either way. When dealing w/a culture of their mentality you fight them w/that mentality, that's all they know or respect. They do not aspire to western ideals of freedom, individual rights, or enlightenment. They mistake kindness for weakness. Let them increase 10 fold for all I care, and let's keep destroying them. Too many touchy feely pussies trying to put a band aid on this when the problem rates a hand-grenade enema.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-2-13 8:24:44 AM  

#5  NMM

And that is bad how?
Looks like the perfect chance to kick quite a lot of jihadi-DNA out of the gene-pool.
Posted by: Evert Visser   2004-2-13 3:03:19 AM  

#4  NMM would you care to enlighten us on the methodology used to reach the 400% figure?
Posted by: phil_b   2004-2-13 2:28:02 AM  

#3  So then, shall we capitulate, NotMike? Oh my, 400% more AQ! Run away! Run away!
Posted by: Rafael   2004-2-13 1:44:54 AM  

#2  Not to mention that this war-mongering Administration has probably increased the number of Al Qaeda recruits by 400%
Posted by: NotMike Moore   2004-2-13 1:38:44 AM  

#1  Al Qaeda may be anointing new, younger leaders to carry on his cause

So are they baby-boomers?
Posted by: phil_b   2004-2-13 1:07:52 AM  

00:00