You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Binny in Fata?
2004-03-01
Osama Bin Laden crossed into Pakistan on Feb 27 and is closely guarded by Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters disguised as a Pakistani tribesman, US media reported on Sunday. The reports said Bin Laden "is currently hiding" in a remote area in South Waziristan near the Afghan border. But when a Pentagon spokesperson was asked to comment on the reports that Bin Laden was seen in Waziristan and that US and Pakistani authorities had stepped up their efforts to catch him, she said: "Yes, we have seen the reports." Asked to confirm or deny the report, she repeated: "I told you, we have seen them."
"That means we aren't commenting on them. Next question, if any?"
The reports said recent US military advances in southern Afghanistan forced Bin Laden and his Taliban supporters to quit their hideouts in Afghanistan. The reports also said more than once US military search teams had come close to these hideouts. Such close encounters, the reports said, convinced Bin Laden and his protectors to seek refuge in the tribal areas of Pakistan and on Feb 27 they crossed into southern Waziristan. But the reports suggest that Bin Laden and his followers are not safe in Pakistan either because US and Pakistani forces have already marked the area where they believe he is hiding. They are, however, reluctant to launch a full assault because of hundreds of Pashtun fighters protecting the Al Qaeda leader.
That's not a bug, that's a feature!
Pakistan is particularly concerned that any offensive that leads to a large number of Pashtun deaths could have very negative political consequences for the government in Islamabad, the reports said. Instead of a direct assault, Pakistan has urged the Americans to isolate Bin Laden and his fighters by severing food and water supplies.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#7  BH - in the '50s there was a "pashtunistan" movement to annex the Pashtun areas of Pakistan to Afghanistan. US opposed it, since at the time Afghanistan was friendly to the Soviets, and Pakistan was firmly pro-Western.

Probably wouldnt be a good idea today. Too many Pashtuns in Afghanistan would make Afghanistan impossible to stabilize. Better leave them in Pakistan, and work around as well as we can.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2004-3-1 10:46:21 AM  

#6  Somebody redraw the maps. If Pakistan is too chicken-sh*t to send its troops into the western part of the country, then guess what? It ain't part of your country.
Posted by: BH   2004-3-1 10:34:10 AM  

#5  Pakistan is particularly concerned that any offensive that leads to a large number of Pukhtun deaths could have very negative political consequences for the government in Islamabad hmmm.. right they may try to assinate the head of the country or something.
Posted by: domingo   2004-3-1 8:28:57 AM  

#4  
Instead of a direct assault, Pakistan has urged the Americans to isolate Bin Laden
What a chicken-shit country.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-3-1 7:33:45 AM  

#3  Osama Bin Laden crossed into Pakistan on Feb 27 and is closely guarded by Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters disguised as a Pakistani tribesman, US media reported on Sunday.

I'd just like to thank the media, who told Binny we're on to what he's doing.
Posted by: Charles   2004-3-1 7:20:09 AM  

#2  Now that was an interesting quote by the pentagon spokeswoman... assuming it is really what she said. I'd like to see this from a US news source before I believe those were the words used...
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American   2004-3-1 12:40:02 AM  

#1  i got a better idea--how about severing his windpipe--along with his pukhtun and arab protectors--how do you like them adam's apples!!
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2004-3-1 12:38:25 AM  

00:00