You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
U.S. Cuts Deal to Hunt Binny In Pakland
2004-03-01
hat tip to Drudge - Interesting development
The United States has struck a deal with Pakistan to allow U.S. troops to hunt for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden this spring in an area of Pakistan where he is believed to be operating, the New Yorker magazine reported on Sunday. Thousands of U.S. troops will be deployed in a tribal area of northwest Pakistan in return for Washington’s support of President Pervez Musharraf’s pardon of the Pakistani scientist who this month admitted leaking nuclear arms secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh wrote in the issue that goes on sale on Monday.
It's another Seymour exclusive. I think I'd wait a week or so to see if anybody else picks up on it. Salt block's over there...
Full disclosure of Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan’s activities would have exposed him as "the worst nuclear-arms proliferator in the world," an intelligence official is quoted as saying.
I think it's already done that...
"It’s a quid pro quo," according to a former senior intelligence official. "We’re going to get our troops inside Pakistan in return for not forcing Musharraf to deal with Khan." Musharraf has also offered other help in the hunt for bin Laden, according to the article. "Musharraf told us, ’We’ve got guys inside. The people who provide fresh fruits and vegetables and herd the goats’ for bin Laden and his al Qaeda followers," the intelligence official added. The spring offensive could slow the tempo of U.S. operations in Iraq, the magazine said. "It’s going to be a full-court press," one Pentagon planner was quoted as saying. The article added that some of the most highly skilled U.S. Special Forces units would be shifted from Iraq to Pakistan.
Already were, according to RB news
Special Forces personnel have been briefed on their new assignments and in some cases have been given "warning orders" -- the stage before being sent into combat, according to a military adviser.
Posted by:Frank G

#10  Gromky, where did you come up with that?
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-3-1 10:12:06 PM  

#9  
Posted by: Gromky   2004-3-1 8:46:38 PM  

#8  Is a hunting liscence required? Is there a bag limit?
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-3-1 5:41:53 PM  

#7  While I do believe that there will be a full court press on AQ this Spring, I wouldn't rely on Sy Hersh's reporting. For someone who's still employed as an investigative reporter, he's been wrong an awful lot.
Posted by: Tibor   2004-3-1 2:25:02 PM  

#6  I agree with those folks who figure that the ISI know exactly where ol' Osama is lying low and this is all kabuki theater to effect the handover. This is assuming that the ISI doesn't decide that their best interest is simply offing Musharref and blowing us off.
Posted by: Hiryu   2004-3-1 12:38:33 PM  

#5  Well this sucks; of two rather unsavory characters, one of them is going to get a pass (for now).
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-3-1 11:26:22 AM  

#4  Musharref has a simple choice, really. Protect Khan or protect bin Ladin. If he chose Osama, his and Pakistan days as an ally would be over.

Dead man walking.
Posted by: john   2004-3-1 10:00:24 AM  

#3  Seems that the days of the Raj are returning as English speakers scour the hills of the NW Frontier. Kipling would love it.
Posted by: Highlander   2004-3-1 9:59:55 AM  

#2  Damn! Is Binny going to be confused when he gets his copy of the New Yorker! Such conflicting signals! What's a guy to do?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-3-1 9:56:33 AM  

#1  Denial in 3, 2, 1..
Pakistan denied Monday a report that it had struck a deal to allow U.S. troops to hunt for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden on its territory.
"This report has no truth in it and there is no such deal," military spokesman Major-General Shaukat Sultan said. The New Yorker quoted a former senior intelligence official as saying it was "a quid pro quo" deal with Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf. "We're going to get our troops inside Pakistan in return for not forcing Musharraf to deal with Khan." Sultan rejected this, saying: "There are no quid pro quos on issues of national sovereignty. We totally deny it." He said he could not comment on reports that the United States planned to shift an elite commando unit that took part in the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq to hunt for bin Laden. "If the U.S. is shifting a special unit from Iraq into Afghanistan, I have no comment on that, but there is none coming in to Pakistan," he said.


"Nope, nope, nobody here, nothing to see, move along."
Posted by: Steve   2004-3-1 9:25:26 AM  

00:00