You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.S. Supports U.N. Oil-For-Food Probe
2004-03-24
The United States will support a U.N.-backed investigation into alleged corruption in the United Nations oil-for-food program, the U.S. ambassador said Tuesday. France and Russia - two countries strongly implicated in the purported wrongdoing - were more reluctant.
Tap -- tap -- tap. Nope.
In Baghdad, the Iraqi Governing Council said it was launching its own investigation into the allegations of corruption, which first surfaced last January in the Iraqi newspaper Al-Mada. The newspaper had a list of about 270 former government officials, activists and journalists from more than 46 countries suspected of profiting from Iraqi oil sales.
Time honored Washington tradition -- multiple investigations. Smart move by the Iraqis.
"Thousands of government and nongovernment officials and politicians were bribed, all under the nose of the United Nations," said Entifadh Qanbar, spokesman for council member Ahmad Chalabi. "The United Nations allowed this to happen without interference. Some high-ranking U.N. officials were also involved." The allegations have been a major embarrassment for the United Nations and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan wants to take swift action and clear the world body of blame. Among the names on the list is Benon Sevan, the U.N. official who was executive director of the program. He has denied wrongdoing.
Clear the world body? Only with a fire hose.
No mention of Kofi's kid?
Annan's spokesman, Fred Eckhard, said Annan welcomed the Baghdad investigation but would press ahead with the house-controlled independent probe as well. "I think he would welcome any way out of this additional light that others could shed on the situation, either out of Baghdad or out of a national capital," Eckhard said. "But I think he feels it's his responsibility to launch a U.N.-based investigation." U.S. congressional investigators have also looked into the program, charging last week that Saddam's government smuggled oil, added surcharges and collected kickbacks to rake in $10.1 billion in violation of the oil-for-food program. On Tuesday, the United States unequivocally supported the U.N.-backed probe, which Annan announced Friday. "We have already communicated to the secretary-general that we're prepared to cooperate in every possible way," U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte said. "I think he's responding to some of the criticism and allegations that have been made and I think he is taking a very constructive approach." Annan has still not said what the probe's mandate will be or who will be on the panel.
Wonder if he'll put Junior on it?
It's also not clear how much authority it will have. U.N. officials speaking on condition of anonymity said in earlier consultations some delegations France, Russia and Germany among them had expressed concern about a probe, so Annan decided not to risk seeking a Security Council resolution backing it, but instead a less powerful sign of support. The official would not say who had the biggest concern, but Russia and France have been more guilty cautious than others. France's U.N. ambassador Jean Marc de la Sabliere said Monday that while France backed transparency in principle, it wanted clarification on what the panel would do.
The French stand for transparency in corruption is unparalleled.
Russia expressed similar concern. According to Al-Mada, the bulk of the bribes went to Russian firms as part of ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's bid to maintain good ties with the Kremlin, which argued against the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq last year.
Problem for Sammy was that France and Russia couldn't deliver what they promised -- to restrain the U.S.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  I can't remember the name of the LtCol who fired a 45cal pistol next to the head of one of Sadaam's henchman's head during an interrogation. If anybody remembers him, please forward his name to Kofi as a nomination to lead the investigation team. That type of appointment might set the appropriate message on the tone we want to achieve during the investigation.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-03-24 9:26:26 PM  

#15  we really need to abandon the UN...at the very least withold our 25% share of the UN budget until this investigation is complete and action taken on the results.

also take some action of those damn diplomats who double park and have unpaid parking tickets!

just send 'em packing.....
Posted by: Dan   2004-03-24 3:34:12 PM  

#14  How's about Eurostan?

I hear Strasburg is lovely this time of year!

I hope the IGC sues the pants off of everyone involved. Hit 'em where it hurts the worse - personal disgorgement of every freakin' red cent.
Posted by: Raj   2004-03-24 1:31:06 PM  

#13  snellar - lol! It just might work.
Posted by: B   2004-3-24 9:37:54 AM  

#12  .com -- I'll work on it :-)

The UN's biggest problem is the "one big organization is more efficient" myth. Although they can be more efficient initially, the long-term problem of an entrenched bureaucracy with too few checks and balances soon arises.

I'd favor taking the apolitical pieces that work (WHO, for example) and giving each their own independent charter. They'll then succeed or fail depending on how well they meet the needs & requirements of their paying constituents. Right now, it's because there's actual value in the working organizations that we have to put up with the "Human Rights (except for us dictators) Commission", etc.

Sometimes, "efficiency" is inefficient...
Posted by: snellenr   2004-3-24 9:32:37 AM  

#11  Lol! You guys are good!

snellenr - can you convince LH to accept your plan? I'll support it 100%, given the specifics.

And we still analyze where we went wrong and design something that makes sense. I'm not sure about the CD (Community of Democracies - from yesterday?), yet, but I know we can design a sensible and workable system. Third try ought to be the charm. When done right, those states that qualify (and it would be strict and a-political, based upon objective criteria) would join. I do not doubt that at all.
Posted by: .com   2004-3-24 9:22:45 AM  

#10  .com, there's too much opportunity for U.N. mischief if we simply withdraw (it'd mess up Israel big-time, for example)...

instead, declare that all future UNSC resolutions will receive a U.S. veto and stop providing our UN funding. Assign a G-7 as UN "Ambassador" with instructions that he/she is (a) never allowed to vote anything but "no", and (b) he/she is never to speak to another representative beyond a polite "hello". Demonstrates our contempt, yet keeps the chair warm (thus avoiding the 'problem' the Russians had in the 1950 Korea vote).
Posted by: snellenr   2004-3-24 9:14:55 AM  

#9  .com, withdrawing unilaterally is not enough. We have to ensure ensure the UN leaves the soil of the United States to live out its dying, discredited days: How's about Eurostan?
Posted by: badanov   2004-3-24 7:56:09 AM  

#8  JM - The US is the only country which would stand to benefit, in truth, so we'll have to withdraw unilaterally I'm afraid. Some others would quickly come along with us if we had a working model of a replacement that actually made sense when we go.
Posted by: .com   2004-3-24 7:26:47 AM  

#7   It is the most corrupt pile of shit ever aseembled by man.
Truer words have never been typed .com

I sincerely hope that this is the straw that breaks the Western worlds back with the UN and all of their hypocritical bullshit. For far to long the UN has been conveyed a legitimacy it simply doesn't have by Tranzi's and shoved down everyone's throat.
Its to much to ask for but I hope we get to say good riddance to bad trash.


Posted by: JerseyMike   2004-3-24 7:11:54 AM  

#6  Ah yes,the old"Set a thief to catch a thief"gambit.
Posted by: Raptor   2004-3-24 6:45:41 AM  

#5  **Standing Ovation**

I love passion - almost as much as I love truth - and you got 'em both in spades, Chiner!

Yeah, the UN is the proverbial dead rat on America's kitchen floor. It is the most corrupt pile of shit ever aseembled by man. It has wasted untold billions of our tax dollars. Time to manipulate it to do something right. I don't doubt for a second that Dubya will push 'em. Nor do I doubt that if they screw this up, we will make it a very public mistake. I've been hoping for a long time that we would wash our hands of this disaster. This just might be the first step in getting rid of the UN. If they play the usual games, it could be the fulcrum.

Thx, Chiner! Your anger is righteous!
Posted by: .com   2004-3-24 4:21:39 AM  

#4  "The United Nations allowed this to happen without interference. Some high-ranking U.N. officials were also involved."

Yeah, I was so angry I didn't finish. OF FUCKING COURSE SOME HIGH RANKING U.N. OFFICIALS WERE ALSO INVOLVED. Start at the top of that God damned bunch of lizards and work your way down. I'm done now. Chine
Posted by: Chiner   2004-3-24 4:02:02 AM  

#3  Chi Zi, a damned UN headed investigation on itself is like asking a 4 year old if he hit his little brother. Nope. By God, if this is not pushed by the USA, and I mean pushed, it will wither in time and the result will come in two or so years. Uh, no evidence of wrongdoing was revealed. I can see it now. Chiner
Posted by: Chiner   2004-3-24 3:44:44 AM  

#2  Squirming like a basket o' rattlers even before the probe has been defined - you're right tu - this will be something to see!

And it couldn't happen to a nicer couple of assholes than Chirak and Putty.

Popcorn's on me!
Posted by: .com   2004-3-24 3:28:51 AM  

#1  ...a U.N.-backed investigation into alleged corruption in the United Nations oil-for-food program...

and

The allegations have been a major embarrassment for the United Nations and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan wants to take swift action and clear the world body of blame.

Pull up a chair. This should be a laff riot.

Posted by: tu3031   2004-3-24 12:54:11 AM  

00:00