You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Military Scorecard McCain vrs Kerry
2004-03-29
EFL
Senate Votes John Kerry John McCain
Subject U.S. Troops to ICC (12-7-01) Yes No
Xfer Navy funding to AIDS (7-10-01) Yes No
McCain amendment to reduce pork
and use money saved for DOD (7-10-01 No Yes
National Missile Defense
(18 votes, 1991 to 2000) No, 18 Times Yes, 18 Times
Cut Defense by $400M (7-10-97) Yes No
Cut Defense by $5M (7-9-97) Yes No
Cut Defense by $13B (6-26-96) Yes No
Freeze DOD spending for 7 years & use
the $34.8B for entitlements (5-24-95 Yes No
Pub Covert Intel Budget (10-19-93) Yes No
Gays in the Military (9-9-93) Yes No
Block military pay raise (3-24-93) Yes No
Help new Enl regist to vote (3-17-93) No Yes
Eliminate B-2 bomber program (9-18-92) Yes No
Xfer $3B from DOD to DE (9-16-92) Yes No
Xfer $3B from DOD and use the money
for social programs (9/10/91) Yes No
Cut $6B from Defense (4-9-92) Yes No
First Iraq War (1-12-91) No Yes
Cut funding for MX Missile (8-1-89) Yes No
Aid anti-Communist fighters in Nicaragua
and Cambodia during the 1980s No, No Yes, Yes

The original article was in tabular form. I agree with McCain. Kerry certainly had a hardon for Defense; nothing soft about that voting record.

Posted by:Super Hose

#5  Certainly an exemplary record for one who would be our next CIC. Pathetic, but I'm not surprised. Great info.......
Posted by: Bill Nelson   2004-03-29 3:10:37 PM  

#4  I would expect the issue to be raised in the debates by W and/or Cheney
Posted by: Frank G   2004-03-29 1:28:15 PM  

#3  "Help new Enl regist to vote (3-17-93) No"

This reminds me: is anyone going to be minding the store this November when Kerry sends out armies of lawyers to try and disqualify every absentee military ballot they can lay their filthy hands on? Al Gore did that in 2000, and somebody ought to be watching out for the same thing this time.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-03-29 12:32:26 PM  

#2  Gays in the Military (9-9-93) Yes No

-enough said.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-03-29 12:31:25 PM  

#1  Subject U.S. Troops to ICC (12-7-01) Yes

Reason enough not to put the guy in the White House.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-03-29 12:19:52 PM  

00:00