You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Coup D’Etat?
2004-04-05
Hat tip LGF
A coup d’etat is taking place in Iraq a the moment. Al-Shu’la, Al-Hurria, Thawra (Sadr city), and Kadhimiya (all Shi’ite neighbourhoods in Baghdad) have been declared liberated from occupation. Looting has already started at some places downtown, a friend of mine just returned from Sadun street and he says Al-Mahdi militiamen are breaking stores and clinics open and also at Tahrir square just across the river from the Green Zone. News from other cities in the south indicate that Sadr followers (tens of thousands of them) have taken over IP stations and governorate buildings in Kufa, Nassiriya, Ammara, Kut, and Basrah. Al-Jazeera says that policemen in these cities have sided with the Shia insurgents, which doesn’t come as a surprise to me since a large portion of the police forces in these areas were recruited from Shi’ite militias and we have talked about that ages ago. And it looks like this move has been planned a long time ago.

No one knows what is happening in the capital right now. Power has been cut off in my neighbourhood since the afternoon, and I can only hear helicopters, massive explosions, and continuous shooting nearby. The streets are empty, someone told us half an hour ago that Al-Mahdi are trying to take over our neighbourhood and are being met by resistance from Sunni hardliners. Doors are locked, and AK-47’s are being loaded and put close by in case they are needed. The phone keeps ringing frantically. Baghdadis are horrified and everyone seems to have made up their mind to stay home tomorrow until the situation is clear.

Where is Shitstani? And why is he keeping silent about this?

I have to admit that until now I have never longed for the days of Saddam, but now I’m not so sure. If we need a person like Saddam to keep those rabid dogs at bay then be it. Put Saddam back in power and after he fills a couple hundred more mass graves with those criminals they can start wailing and crying again for liberation. What a laugh we will have then. Then they can shove their filthy Hawza and marji’iya up somewhere else. I am so dissapointed in Iraqis and I hate myself for thinking this way. We are not worth your trouble, take back your billions of dollars and give us Saddam again. We truly ’deserve’ leaders like Saddam.

UPDATE: Sorry for the depressing note. It seems like everything is back under control, at least from what I can see in my neighbourhood. There is an eerie silence outside, only dogs barking. Until about an hour ago, it sounded like a battlefield, and we had flashbacks of last April. I don’t know what happened, but there were large plumes of smoke from the direction of Adhamiya and Kadhimiya. I wanted to take some pictures but my father and uncle both said they would shoot me on the spot if I tried, they were afraid the Apaches would mistake us for troublemakers and fire at us. I’m dreading tomorrow.

# posted by zeyad : 4/5/2004 11:30:23 PM
Posted by:tipper

#11  This looks to me like it is Iranian inspired.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-04-05 11:49:51 PM  

#10  On the other hand, it required a Civil War in America to end slavery here... perhaps that's what it will take in Iraq, too...
Posted by: Hyper   2004-04-05 10:44:53 PM  

#9  Sadly, reminds one of Monty Python's "Life of Brian", regarding the Romans...

"...let's face it, the only one's who could keep order in a place like this..."
Posted by: Hyper   2004-04-05 10:19:52 PM  

#8  I heard a thought today on cable regarding the Iraqis from a guy who knew is stuff. "Iraq is a culture of snitchs" is what he basicly said. Lends support to knowing shit was about to go off.
Posted by: Lucky   2004-04-05 10:06:30 PM  

#7  ...the US had snipers ready and in position in key locations...

From the sound of it, this is something that had been brewing for a long time, and I find it hard to believe the Coalition had no wind of it whatsoever. Surely we've laid plans of our own.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2004-04-05 9:01:44 PM  

#6  I meant "Tet" in the sense of a tactical defeat that turns into a strategic victory thanks to propaganda and misunderstandings, OldSpook; personally, I hope you're right. I do have questions about how much material and support is coming from Iran, and can cross over from there. HOPEFULLY they're limited by their domestic situation, but I don't like saying "Hopefully..."
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-04-05 8:36:58 PM  

#5  They have done the right thing - apparently (not sayign where I heard this) the US had snipers ready and in position in key locations in the areas where the violence died out quickly.

Sadr's boys came out tootin and shootin, and were left alone, until the leaders showed themselves. Those guys got dropped, quick fast and in a hurry. One Shot One Kill.

50BMG does nasty things to a human body, especially if its center mass (blows the heart out the back) or the head (No head left from the ears back).

After that, the US moved the troops and helicopters in.

Thats why things got quiet in a hurry - the essentially decapitated the leadership, excepting the very top. And he will likely die while resisting arrest.

Notice that they were apparently trying to get children into the fight - tells you a lot about Sadr, doesn't it?

Tet this is not. No outside support of any magnitude, no jungle, no Ho Chi Minh Trail, the populace is not supportive (Sadr is fringe and hated by Sunnis and moderate Shiites) and Sadr and his leash holders in Iraq are no Nguyen Giap, nor are we Westmoreland & Johnson.
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-04-05 8:26:04 PM  

#4  Belmont Club has an excellent commentary on zeyad's post
Posted by: tipper   2004-04-05 8:25:21 PM  

#3  Strategypage is a good site for some perspective and is generally accurate. Their view of the Sadr power play is more measured, but still sobering.

It sounds like we forced Sadr's hand somewhat in our recent crackdown. He may have sensed opportunity after Fallujah and our anticipated response. No doubt he's considered the troop rotation/drawdown and turnover to the IP, in which he had infiltrated some of his people. Plus he's not too bright.

The key questions regard the degree to which Iran is involved and whether we have enough troops to maintain order. If Iran is putting all of its eggs in the Sadr basket, Sadr may have more resources and we probably do not have enough troops. Still, I sense he moved too soon and it is hard for me to see how they can do much more than take over a few buildings until a tank or AC-130 appears.

But I'm just an armchair guy so hopefully the the Rantburgers who've actually been there and done that can assess the situation on the ground. If we need more troops Bush better do the right thing regardless of the political cost.
Posted by: JAB   2004-04-05 8:17:49 PM  

#2  Tens of thousands?

Recheck your number.

Its probably less than 5000 or so are the core Sadr. THe rest might be looters and criminals, palin and simple, taking advanatage of the chaose and lawlessness brought on by Sadr's thugs.
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-04-05 8:17:33 PM  

#1  I was trying to post this, but screwed up because I wasn't [details deleted], and had the following commentary: It almost sounds like a textbook repeat of the Tet Offensive. Remember that the Tet Offensive was a tactical disaster but a strategic success: the average TV viewer at home seemed to be oblivious to the fact that large numbers of the "guerillas" were NVA regulars, who were committing massacres of civilians (for instance at Hue). I'm beginning to think that it's a big mistake to underestimate the power of the useful idiots.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-04-05 8:16:19 PM  

00:00