You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Fearful Arab regimes refrain from criticising US
2004-04-11
While support for Sunni and Shia Muslims fighting US troops in Iraq is heating up on the Arab street, Arab regimes are shying away from publicly criticising US military operations in the war-torn country.
Oh, why not? Go ahead and be consistent.
Although some analysts put the Arab regimes’ low profile down to fear of antagonising Washington, others said officials are worried that Iran might be behind a revolt by militiamen loyal to a radical Iraqi Shia cleric.
It's that obvious, is it?
Arab satellite televisions have pointed out that most Arab governments have not reacted to a bloody US assault on the Sunni stronghold of Fallujah, west of Baghdad, or to clashes between coalition forces and partisans of Moqtada Sadr in the south. And for those Arab regimes that did react, their words were far weaker than those of Russia, which Friday called on the US-led coalition to refrain from “disproportionate” use of force and halt its offensive.
One word: Grozny.
“Arab governments are keen on having good relations with the United States,” said Mustafa Kamel al-Said, a lecturer at the faculty of economy and political science at Cairo University. “Some Arab governments depend on the United States for financial assistance, others are having problems with Washington and want to improve their relationship,” he said.
Meaning it's a good time to keep quiet and see which way the wind eventually blows...
Given that “most Arab regimes are not democratic”, Said said that they feel threatened by Washington’s “Greater Middle East Initiative”, a reform plan to spread democracy and economic liberalisation in the Middle East. But Waheed Abdul Megeed, from the Al-Ahram Centre of Strategic Studies, disagreed, pointing out that several Arab countries, including US allies such as Egypt, did oppose the US-led invasion of Iraq one year ago. “What is happening now in Iraq, he said, delays the hand over of sovereignty to the Iraqis,” slated for June 30, under a timetable agreed by the US-led coalition and Iraqi politicians, and endorsed by the United Nations. Megeed said several Arab regimes consider “Iran to have instigated the movement of Moqtada Sadr” to wrestle control of some southern cities from Bulgarian, Salvadorian, Spanish and Ukranian coalition control.
And maybe even frighten them out of the alliance...
He said hardliner conservatives who ousted reformists in Iran’s controversial February elections “want to drag the US forces in Iraq to a swamp, in order to prevent Washington from turning against Iran” later on. “It is very simplistic to say what is happening now is resistance against occupation, it is far more complicated than this,” he said.
Cheeze. Even an Arab scholar can see it...
As thousands of Palestinian, Syrian and Egyptian demonstrators took to the streets of their cities over the past few days, Arab League Chief Amr Moussa stood alone in the world of officialdom by saying Thursday that “what is happening is unacceptable”.
Amr can't see it, though.
Posted by:Fred

#3  Like it says on the label here...

Oderint dum metuant
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-04-11 7:11:00 PM  

#2  Iran is next on the hit list for sure. They've caused way too much trouble to be ignored. And when proof comes out Iran was behind the uprising, well, if it's after the June 30th deadline we'll just be moving next door.
Posted by: Charles   2004-04-11 2:58:53 PM  

#1  Go Fred!
Posted by: Shipman   2004-04-11 1:00:57 PM  

00:00