You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Brahimi Wants New Iraq Gov't Set Up Soon
2004-04-28
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The top U.N. envoy to Iraq called Tuesday for Iraq's caretaker government to be selected by the end of May and said it should reach "crystal clear understandings" on its relationship with U.S.-led coalition forces before the June 30 handover of power.
"Okay! Youze mutts do as youze are told. Izzat crystal-clear?"
In a briefing to the U.N. Security Council, Lakhdar Brahimi expanded on his initial ideas on a transitional government to assume sovereignty from the coalition and run Iraq until national elections by the end of January 2005. Even in the face of deteriorating security, Brahimi said "the job is doable" but he stressed that the plan is still a work in progress and he expects to return to Iraq for consultations.

The Security Council welcomed his "provisional ideas" and members asked many questions - to which they got few answers.
It's the UN, they're fresh out of answers.
As Britain's U.N. Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry said, Brahimi couldn't answer detailed questions because "they're questions which the process in the next months" will never answer. U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte said "He's laid out an overall sketch of the political direction in which we're headed, but now the flesh has to be put on those bones."
Bad metaphor after Fallujah.
One of the key questions is how to choose the prime minister, president and two vice-presidents that Brahimi earlier said should form the caretaker government. But Brahimi said the Iraqi people, with help from the United Nations, should by the end of May be able to select honest, qualified people to fill top posts, giving the caretaker government a month "to prepare to assume responsibility for governing the country."
Which is more than the UN can do for itself.
Brahimi also nattered on over elaborated on his earlier proposal for a national conference in July that would bring together Iraqis from all walks of life "to engage in a genuine national dialogue with blunt instruments on the country's challenges." He said the conference should not be convened by the United Nations - as was done in Afghanistan - but by Iraqis.
So, it might work.
A preparatory committee should be established as soon as possible, he said, adding that it should be made up of "a small number of reputable and distinguished Iraqis, including prominent and respected judges, who are not seeking political office." From preliminary discussions with a wide range of Iraqis, the United Nations envisions between 1,000 and 1,500 Iraqis taking part in the conference, Brahimi said.
Thus guaranteeing that nothing gets done except posturing.
The conference should appoint a "consultative council" to provide advice to the government, debate key issues and form committees which would receive reports from ministers in the run up to national elections, slate to be held by the end of January 2005.
The UN is big on committees, ya know.
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Don't you even understand your DUmmy Talking Points screech well enough to formulate a rational tirade? You're a tool fool - and a lamer to boot. Go back and ask for help from an aDUlt, if you can locate one, sonny.
Posted by: .com   2004-04-29 12:13:32 AM  

#7  The Security Council welcomed his "provisional ideas" and members asked many questions - to which they got few answers.

It's the UN, they're fresh out of answers
Posted by: Michael 2004-04-28 2:18:57 PM



Umm This is Bush's war. What's his plan.

Remember Bush told the UN to kiss his A$$.

Now he's in constant prayer hoping this proped up govt works long enough till Nov 2.

What Army will defend this new Govt.





Posted by: Langs   2004-04-29 12:01:24 AM  

#6  A positive spin on this is that the iraqis are going to be faced with a choice. Do you want the UN proposal or not. I think it highly likely it will be rejected. Which will be another nail in teh UN's coffin.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-04-28 9:30:26 PM  

#5  I get the feeling these yammerheads were supposed to be on the flag designing comittee, but it let out early. Send 'em back, keep 'em busy with that ultra-important task while the grown-ups decide what to do about the gomers with the guns.
Posted by: mojo   2004-04-28 5:36:15 PM  

#4  "Why in God's name is W giving so much lee way to him?"

Some would say that we originally intended to count on the Shia to oppose UN influence. When our relations with Sistani deteriorated, whether you blame the CPA or Sistani, we needed to fall back on the UN.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-04-28 4:53:30 PM  

#3  
Brahimi Wants New Iraq Gov't Set Up Soon
Who gives a shit what that anti-Semitic jackass wants? Fuck him. And the camel he rode in on.

Butt out, asshole.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-04-28 4:33:26 PM  

#2  Brahimi on the loose is not the type of guy we want sticking his nose in Iraq. He a product of the Algerian revolution, loves its generals, etc. In other words, he finds comfort in the typical Arab govt. template of a strong leader over representative govt. Which brings up one thing. Why in God's name is W giving so much lee way to him? I remember what the prez said at his press conference. What gives? I know how Brahimi helped out in Afghanistan, but that wasn't Arab.
Posted by: Michael   2004-04-28 2:18:57 PM  

#1  Saw Bernard Lewis on Charlie Rose last night. Lewis is worried that Brahimi will rebaathify the govt. US needs to make sure that the firm anti-Baathists, including the IGC people and Sistanis people are not pushed out by Brahimi/UN/Sunni arab neighbors. See above Iraqi press post.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-04-28 10:10:50 AM  

00:00