You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Hitchens: Are war correspondents betting on failure in Iraq?
2004-05-02
Guess the answer Chris Hitchens comes up with. EFL, but read the whole thing at the link.
It's now fairly obvious that those who cover Iraq have placed their bets on a fiasco or "quagmire" and that this conclusion shows in the fiber and detail of their writing.
*****
I continue to be amazed at the way in which so many liberals repeat the discredited mantra of the CIA to the effect that Saddam Hussein's regime was so "secular" that it not only did not collaborate, but axiomatically could not have collaborated with Islamists. If you can imagine a Hitler-Stalin pact (which, admittedly, a lot of American leftists still cannot), you can probably imagine collusion between discrepant factions with common interests.

In any case, the Saddam regime was not as "secular" as all that. The campaign of extermination waged in northern Iraq by Saddam's army was titled "Anfal" after a verse in the Quran that supposedly licenses total war. The words "Allahu Akbar" were placed on the Iraqi flag after the defeat in Kuwait. The Baath Party became the open patron of Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Palestine. The rhetoric of the Saddamist leadership was exclusively jihadist for the last decade, with special mosques built all over the country in honor of the regime. Now comes a document from the files of the Iraqi secret police, or Mukhabarat, dated March 28, 1992, and headed routinely, "In the Name of Allah, the Merciful and Compassionate." It is a straightforward listing of contacts and "assets," quite unsensational until it comes to the "Saudi front," where we find the name "Osama bin Ladin/he is well-known Saudi businessman, founder of Saudi opposition in Afghanistan, had connection with Syrian division." Of course, this is not a smoking gun.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  I love Hitch!
He's a true eccentric in the classical sense plus he's brilliant, witty and outstandingly articulate.
And he can nail the Left where it hurts because he used to be one of them.
Oh, the humanity! LOL
(The only time he loses me is when he goes off on Kissinger and the "coup" Hitch claims he pulled with Pinochet in Chile 1973.)
Posted by: Jen   2004-05-02 10:35:00 PM  

#2  
Are war correspondents betting on failure in Iraq?
Betting on it? They're trying to bring it about.

Fucking jackasses. And traitors.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-05-02 10:29:54 PM  

#1  I know some blogs don't care for Hitchens too much, but overall, since 9-11, I think he's been pretty consistent in backing Dubya's WOT efforts.

Did piss me off with his bashing of M. Gibson and "The Passion", but hey, he's still got plenty of time to come around on some things!
Posted by: geezer   2004-05-02 1:56:27 PM  

00:00