You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Oral sex lessons to cut rates of teenage pregnancy
2004-05-10
Since today seems to be turning into the Spice Channel meets Animal Planet
Encouraging schoolchildren to nibble at each other's pee-pees experiment with oral sex could prove the most effective way of curbing teenage pregnancy rates, a government study has found.
"Marv, Tiffany's face is round as a basketball!"
"Hmmm... I think she has the mumps!"
"Thank God! I was afraid she was... pregnant!"
Pupils under 16 who were taught to consider other forms of ’intimacy’ such as oral sex were significantly less likely to engage in full intercourse, it was revealed.
Sure they'll stop
"Gosh! I never thought it'd fit in your ear!"
"What?"
Britain’s teenage pregnancy rate is the highest in Europe. In 2002 there were 39,286 teen pregnancies recorded. The government has spent more than £60 million to tackle the problem but so far failed to halt the rise. A sex education course developed by Exeter University trains teachers to talk to teenagers about ’stopping points’ before full sex.
"Don't! Stop! Don't! Stop! Don't Stop! don'tstopdontstop........
Now an unpublished government-backed report reveals that a trial of the course has been a success. Schoolchildren, particularly girls, who received such training developed a ’more mature’ response to sex.
Where was this training when I was in school?
I think we were all self-taught back then.
The study by the National Foundation for Educational Research found youngsters were ’less likely to be sexually active’ than peers who received traditional forms of sex education, dispelling the fears of family campaigners who believe such methods actually arouse the sexual interest of teenagers.
And the Foundation wouldn't lie.
Now the government will recommend the scheme, called "A Pause", to schools throughout England and Wales following the success of the trial in 104 schools where sexual intercourse among 16-year-olds fell by up to 20 per cent, according to Dr John Tripp of the Department of Child Health at the University of Exeter, who helped to design the course. Teachers who sign up to the course are primed to deal with queries from pupils on all kinds of sexual experience. Those behind the course stress the scheme does not suggest teenagers experiment with oral sex. Instead they say "A Pause" promotes the message that other forms of physical intimacy are safer than full intercourse.
"I ned not in my node, dammit!"
’It teaches people assertiveness skills and that they should be only as intimate as they feel comfortable with,’ said Tripp.
Or what they are taught they should be comfortable with.
A Department for Education and Skills spokesman said the report’s verdict would be made available to all schools. ’All teachers respect peer-reviewed material, and this will help influence their decision,’ he said.
"Ok, who wants to teach the girls oral sex class......Chester, put your hand down, the answer is still no!"

We need to look at this kind of thinking and the behavior of the people at Abu Ghraib and ask if there are any connections.
Posted by:Mr. Davis

#12  peace now--no war for oil--not in our name--suck don't fuck
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2004-05-11 12:35:21 AM  

#11  Ask Juanita Broderick.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-05-10 7:01:32 PM  

#10  Doesn't matter BE. All Clinton hears is "yes", just like his wife.
Posted by: Charles   2004-05-10 6:48:29 PM  

#9  RT - Monica said yes, Paula said no.
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-10 3:57:46 PM  

#8  And the U.K. continues its downward spiral.....
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-05-10 3:48:29 PM  

#7  I find this advice hard to swallow...
Posted by: Raj   2004-05-10 3:35:21 PM  

#6  Oral Sex - Bill Clinton's True Legacy.
Posted by: Random thoughts   2004-05-10 3:28:13 PM  

#5  RC,

Consider; order is all about behavior. What kind of behavior are our kids being told is acceptable? And not just by the government in school, but business in advertising and parents in the divorce rate. This lowering of standards is related to people taking and distributing the pictures that have graced our screens for days. I agree with anonymous J that it has gone too far and that there are consequences. That they are just desserts is too far for me, but that there is a relation is not.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-05-10 3:15:58 PM  

#4  This is child abuse pure and simple. How disgusting that parents allow these leftist creeps to get away with this sh*t. Here little girl, this is how to do a bj to pleasure us big boys..what a bunch of corrupt, sexist, pornographer perverts. Bleghh. Sorry, but I'm thinking the western world is getting their just desserts (and no, I'm not condoning terrorism) but the western world is sick and getting sicker.
Posted by: AnonymousJ   2004-05-10 3:06:41 PM  

#3  We need to look at this kind of thinking and the behavior of the people at Abu Ghraib and ask if there are any connections.

That's one of the most ridiculous statements I've read. Why does everyone feel the need to score political points off of what should be a simple law-and-order issue?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-05-10 2:40:26 PM  

#2  Can they take it pass - fail (need I mention the sole determining criteria)?
Posted by: Raj   2004-05-10 2:23:21 PM  

#1  Does this course have a lab session?
Posted by: Mercutio   2004-05-10 2:21:48 PM  

00:00