You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Muhammad Taught Moslems to Take Non-Moslems Hostage
2004-05-15
From Al Muhajiroun
... The widespread support of Western regimes for the pirate state of Israel, the sanctioning of the occupation of Iraq and the discrimination of Muslims in many countries including the holding of innocent Muslims in jails in Cuba, Italy, Spain and Germany, for example, in fact lays all their tourists and overseas civilians open to retaliatory attacks in return for the release of Muslims being held or changes in these regimes foreign policies.

In light of the above we urge all non-Muslims to leave Muslim countries at a time when we are being ruled by dictatorial regimes supported by the West. Since the collapse of the Islamic State on the 3rd of March 1924 Muslims and Islamic movements have risen to re-establish the Khilafah (ruling by Islam) but have come up against a host of obstacles both physical and intellectual. The physical obstacles have included the puppet regimes imposed upon Muslims by the British, French and Americans (amongst others), dictators ruling with barbaric and murderous agendas and armies looking after the interests of their masters, as opposed to defending the lives, wealth and honour of the Muslims as they should. Intellectual obstacles have included the imposition of un-Islamic education curricula leading to a lack of understanding of Islam as a unique divine way of life by the masses, the imposition of government scholars heretically introducing innovations which make Islamic law secondary to Western or Secular Jurisprudence and even completely dismantling some aspects of Islam altogether, in order to please their Kings and Presidents. Hence central and clear cut concepts such as the obligation to fight Jihad, martyrdom operations and the rejection of all non-Islamic legislative bodies and laws (such as the UN, IMF, NATO etc
) have suddenly become the subject of false Fatwas.

Alhamdulillah (praise be to Allah) there is a revival of Muslims taking place around the world, and a wish to fulfil the promise of the Messenger Muhammad (saw) that Islam will one day dominate the world. Obviously this will clearly not be achieved unless all obstacles to the implementation of Islam are removed and there is an awakening of the Muslim masses from the stupor in which they have found themselves for the last 80 odd years. For it is ultimately the job of the Khilafah (the head of the Islamic State) to impose Shari’ah law upon all its citizens and to declare the foreign policy of the future State to remove obstacles outside of its frontiers in order to expand its boundaries - so that one day the Shari’ah can be implemented world wide.
Oh, what a joyful day for the baby ducks!
Any misconceived ideas that Democracy and Freedom could still be the future for Iraq or for any other Muslim countries, have thankfully received the ultimate nail-in-the-coffin through this latest Abu Ghuraib episode and have made the job of decomposing Sheikh Usama Bin Laden and other Islamic Scholars and revivalist that much easier. For the results of Democracy, freedom and women’s rights being captured in over 1,800 photos and displayed in the 100’s of 1000’s of corpses trailing behind the US and UK’s policies in Afghanistan and Iraq. Therefore as the US and UK withdraw their forces from Iraq – as they now surely must unless they want to be buried in the deserts of Iraq by the seething angry masses – we remind them to take their civilians and contractors with them because they will not be needed when the Shari’ah is implemented.
'cause everything works by itself in Shari'ah, ya know.
Moreover it is important that the non-Muslim occupiers and tourists in Muslim countries appreciate that without a Khalifah the apostate leaders in Muslim countries cannot make binding covenants of security sanctifying the lives and wealth of non-Muslims when they enter or have entered (post 1924). This, together with the fact that the Messenger Muhammad (saw) used to take non-Muslims hostage in order to release Muslims being held captive by the enemies, is all the more reason for non-Muslims to leave Muslim countries until we have removed the apostate rulers and once again protected the lives of all citizens by implementing the Shari’ah over all Muslim lands. In short, there is no reason that anyone need lose their head in Iraq or indeed elsewhere in the Muslim world - once we have restored the Khilafah non-Muslims will once more be welcome, but until such time their presence is clearly a cause of instability in Muslim countries.
"And after we implement Shari'ah, no one loses their heads ... expect the kufrs, ... and the apostates ... and the non-believers ... and cousin Mahmoud with the shifty eyes who looks like he wants my bejeweled turban ...
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#13  Phil, I've found that, too, and I'm wondering if it's not partially brought on by the conspiratorial worldview that they have. For centuries it's been every-man-for-himself in the Arab world, and if you want to get to the top, you have to work secretly with a few people to get there: conspiracy is therefore a given. Along with money, favors, and patrons (whom you may be scheming to overthrow), conspiracy is one of the things that seems to make the Arab world "work." Therefore, if you're a victim, someone else has a better conspiracy.

Just a thought. Technically, anyway.
Posted by: The Doctor   2004-05-15 10:08:29 PM  

#12  Doctor, victimhood seems central to Islam and moslems self-image (and world-view). Its almost as if they need to be ruled by dictators and despots in order to be victims.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-05-15 9:38:52 PM  

#11  The Doctor, nice one. Foreign is foreign to them.
Posted by: Lucky   2004-05-15 9:08:10 PM  

#10  Hmm . . . interesting how they mention their own rulers in there. In an effort to become slightly more educated on Islam, I've been reading up on it lately, and everything seems to indicate that it's not just the West that they don't like, but their leaders, too, to a certain extent. This would seem to fit right in with that theory.

Yet, the more I read, the more I am at a loss to explain how to stop them peacefully. Logic is foreign to them. Consequences are foreign to them. Pluralism is foreign to them. Perspective is foreign to them. Even truth is foreign to them.
Posted by: The Doctor   2004-05-15 6:51:51 PM  

#9  Don't despair JarHead, history is on your side.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-05-15 2:44:48 PM  

#8  Israel, a pirate state?
"Yarrrrrr! Oyyyyyyyyy!"
Posted by: tu3031   2004-05-15 11:08:36 AM  

#7  Of those who were abused at Abu Ghraib, how many were uniformed Iraqi soldiers, innocent bystanders, baby duck farmers, or father's of the year? Okay, and how many were some asshole in civilian clothes planting IEDs, toting RPGs, and shooting at our lads w/AKs? For the latter group - I could give a shit how much they were humiliated, beaten, hazed or pseudo-tortured.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-05-15 11:04:30 AM  

#6  Napoleon's armies had one punishment for such men - summary execution.

Sounds good to me!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-05-15 10:52:07 AM  

#5  Anonymous4617: So Mojo, are you saying because 7 soldiers abused some prisoners the whole world deserves to be ruled by a bunch of retards from the Middle Ages?

This has nothing to do with who deserves what. It has to do with what happens when rules are broken. Who starts the chain of rule-breaking is irrelevant - the moment it starts, neither side needs to obey the rules. And this has nothing to do with the Geneva Convention - these are rules that precede it. By fighting out of uniform, terrorists are breaking the traditional laws of war. Napoleon's armies had one punishment for such men - summary execution.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-05-15 10:07:50 AM  

#4  "In light of the above we urge all non-Muslims to leave Muslim countries at a time when we are being ruled by dictatorial regimes supported by the West."

I've got a better idea. Why don't ALL Mooselums leave all Non-Mooslum countries and go back to their countries and leave the rest of the world alone. Where they can cut each others heads off to their hearts content.
Posted by: 98zulu   2004-05-15 6:21:57 AM  

#3  So Mojo, are you saying because 7 soldiers abused some prisoners the whole world deserves to be ruled by a bunch of retards from the Middle Ages?
Posted by: Anonymous4617   2004-05-15 4:52:04 AM  

#2  An honorable enemy is one who declares war before beginning combat; fights according to recognized rules of war, honoring such traditions as the flag of truce; treats civilians in occupied territory with due consideration; and—a crucial point—refrains from the mistreatment of prisoners of war. Those who surrender should be treated with generosity. Adversaries who honor the code will benefit from its protections, while those who want a dirty fight will get one.
-- Walter Russell Mead, "The Jacksonian Tradition"
Posted by: mojo   2004-05-15 1:46:45 AM  

#1  Cut-throaters!!!! Is there nothing they.....
Posted by: Lucky   2004-05-15 1:05:54 AM  

00:00