You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
UK troops battle al-Sadr fighters
2004-06-17
British soldiers clashed with Shi'ite fighters loyal to radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr in southeastern Iraq today after coalition troops detained one of the militia's leaders. No one was hurt, a British military spokesman said. Three British military vehicles were fired upon early today with small arms fire and a rocket propelled grenade in two separate attacks in the city of Amarah, 290km southeast of Baghdad, the spokesman said. None of the vehicles was damaged. The attacks happened after British forces detained militia leader, Ahmed Hachi. A British military spokesman said three people were arrested just after midnight on Wednesday. He did not identify those arrested. According to the witnesses, the fighting lasted about an hour and a shop was burned. The trouble began just one day after al-Sadr took steps to honour an agreement meant to end fighting with American forces in the holy cities of Nafaj and Kufa, ordering fighters who did not live in those twin cities to return home. Many of the fighters who rushed to Najaf from Baghdad, Nasiriyah and other cities had already left after a truce brokered by Shi'ite politicians and clerics to end nearly eight weeks of fighting around some of Shia Islam's holiest shrines. The announcement was significant because it indicated al-Sadr is taking steps toward defusing tensions in Shi'ite areas and cooperating with the interim government and Shi'ite clerical hierarchy.
Or to try and save face, and his neck.
Al-Sadr launched his uprising in April after US occupation authorities closed his newspaper, arrested a key aide and announced a warrant for his arrest in the April 2003 murder of a moderate cleric. The US had vowed to "capture or kill" al-Sadr, but US President George W Bush said on Tuesday he would leave it to the new interim Iraqi government to deal with the radical cleric. Al-Sadr's forces are still skirmishing regularly with US troops in Baghdad's Sadr City district, but they were routed by the 1st Armored Division in Karbala and their ranks were significantly reduced in Najaf and Kufa.
Posted by:Steve

#5  Let The Highlanders at 'em again. Chop chop chop...
Posted by: Howard UK   2004-06-17 3:24:42 PM  

#4  Ahmed Hachi. For us Jay Sherman fans, that would be Ahmed Hachi Machi.
Posted by: Tibor   2004-06-17 12:54:44 PM  

#3  But wait, SadSack packed it in, so none of this fighting should be happening! Right? RIGHT??

The US had vowed to "capture or kill" al-Sadr, but US President George W Bush said on Tuesday he would leave it to the new interim Iraqi government to deal with the radical cleric.

Uh huh. If you're going to do something, DO IT. If not, don't say anything about it. American credibility took a hit here.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-06-17 10:55:14 AM  

#2  Oh my God! A New York Times opinion piece!

Everybody knows how accurate those are!!!
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-06-17 10:42:03 AM  

#1  OT:
How Bush-Powell armed al-Sadr/al-Qaeda private militias in Iraq.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/17/opinion/17WRIG.html?th

June 30, 2004 = Pearl Harbor2 Prediction: within one year, the surrender implications of Bush-Powell's faith-based/limited-war/nation-building folly in Iraq will kick in, and GWB will become the most despised President in US history.
Posted by: Dog Bites Trolls   2004-06-17 10:35:29 AM  

00:00