You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Imperial Hubris author named
2004-07-01
EFL:
The active U.S. intelligence officer known only as "Anonymous," who has gained world renown this month as author of an upcoming book called "Imperial Hubris," is actually named Michael Scheuer, according to an article in the Boston Phoenix today by Jason Vest. Speculation about his identity has run rampant since a June 23 article in The New York Times discussed the book and the background of the author. The book, "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror," asserts, among other things, that Osama bin Laden is not on the run and that the invasion of Iraq has not made the United States safer.

In that June 23 piece, the Times identified Anonymous as a 22-year CIA veteran who ran the Counterterrorist Center's bin Laden station from 1996 to 1999, adding that a "senior intelligence official" held that revealing the man's full name "could make him a target of Al Qaeda." Anonymous has appeared in brief television interviews always in silhouette. According to Vest, "Nearly a dozen intelligence-community sources, however, say Anonymous is Michael Scheuer -- and that his forced anonymity is both unprecedented and telling in the context of CIA history and modern politics." Vest in his article notes that "at issue here is not just the book's content, but why Anonymous is anonymous. After all, as the Times and others have reported, his situation is nothing like that of Valerie Plame, a covert operative whose ability to work active overseas cases was undermined when someone in the White House blew her cover to journalist Robert Novak in an apparent payback for an inconvenient weapons-of-mass-destruction intelligence report by her husband, Joseph Wilson. Anonymous, on the other hand, is, by the CIA's own admission, a Langley, Va.-bound analyst whose identity has never required secrecy.
A bitter, desk-bound analyst with a agenda of his own, it seems.
Posted by:Dragon Fly

#5  Next stop, the cover on Vanity Fair.
Posted by: Capt America   2004-07-01 5:24:46 PM  

#4  Spot on, tu3031!
Posted by: Raj   2004-07-01 12:32:05 PM  

#3  Evidently the "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you" doesn't apply to the desk-bound . . .
Posted by: The Doctor   2004-07-01 12:14:48 PM  

#2  The Phoenix? I figured they were too busy taking escort service and call girl ads for the DNC to cover actual news.
Posted by: tu3031   2004-07-01 11:22:14 AM  

#1  also since he ran the bin-Laden station from 1996 to 1999, a logical person would infer that his book really reflects on how the Clinton administration was losing the war

don't hold your breath waiting for big media to make the same inference
Posted by: mhw   2004-07-01 8:34:05 AM  

00:00