You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Steyn the Merciless: CBS falls for Kerry campaign's fake memo
2004-09-11
HT to Instapundit
A few weeks ago, Thomas Oliphant of the Boston Globe was on PBS' ''Newshour'' explaining why the hundreds of swift boat veterans' allegations against John Kerry's conduct in Vietnam was unworthy of his attention. "The standard of clear and convincing evidence," he said, talking to Swiftvet John O'Neill as if he were a backward fourth-grader, ''is what keeps this story in the tabloids -- because it does not meet basic standards.''

Last week, we got a good idea of what Thomas Oliphant's ''basic standards'' are. Dan Rather and the elderly gentlemen at ''60 Minutes'' were all atwitter because they'd come into possession of some hitherto undiscovered memos relating to whether George W. Bush failed to show up for his physical in the War of 1812. The media had been flogging this dead horse all spring, but these newly ''discovered'' memos had jump-started the old nag just enough to get him on his knees long enough for the media to flog him all over again.

Unfortunately for CBS, Dan Rather's hairdresser sucks up so much of the budget that there was nothing left for any fact-checking, so the ''60 Minutes'' crew rushed on air with a damning National Guard memo conveniently called ''CYA'' that Bush's commanding officer had written to himself 32 years ago. ''This was too hot not to push,'' one producer told the American Spectator. Hundreds of living Swiftvets who've signed affidavits and are prepared to testify on camera -- that's way too cold to push; we'd want to fact-check that one thoroughly, till, say, midway through John Kerry's second term. But a handful of memos by one dead guy slipped to us by a Kerry campaign operative -- that meets ''basic standards'' and we gotta get it out there right away.
Posted by:Frank G

#22  The blogosphere (sp ?) will crush CBS in this matter

They are banking you are wrong. It's called "going for broke." I used to be pretty good at that myself, if I don't mind saying so.

Most people are sheep and they control the majority of the information flow. Don't be so sure they can't pull it off.
Posted by: B   2004-09-12 4:17:19 AM  

#21  I'll erply to lal hist tomooorrow, or whenevver I stpo drimking hevilay whutevr cums fisrt.
Posted by: anD Rathre   2004-09-11 10:28:06 PM  

#20  Arrogance goes before the fall - Dan et al will fall a pretty good ways.

Posted by: JP   2004-09-11 10:10:53 PM  

#19  Can't happen. They're too big to fit on the same stage (or on the same screen from any reasonable distance).
Posted by: Tom   2004-09-11 8:52:21 PM  

#18  GK - Intersting question. Has anyone seen Ted and Mike together at the same time (and not on video)?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-09-11 8:38:39 PM  

#17  #10 Moonves looks pretty unbaised to me. He didn't donate to Dhimmicrats at the county level.

Ted Kennedy's middle name is Moore? Is he related to that other obese Moore-- Mikey?
Posted by: GK   2004-09-11 7:34:40 PM  

#16  Ran Rather - Editor emeritus, or editor rigermortus?
Posted by: BigEd   2004-09-11 6:26:50 PM  

#15  Oh my, he's in rare form:

George W. Bush ought to wake up every morning and thank the Lord the media aren't on his side.

Remember the Hitler Diaries? They turned up in the '80s. Only problem is they weren't by Hitler. But by then various prestige publications had paid a fortune to serialize them. Among them was the Sunday Times of London, owned by Murdoch, who wasn't happy. He called the editor, Frank Giles, into his office, and said, ''Frank, I'm promoting you to editor emeritus.''

''I've always wondered,'' murmured Frank, ''what 'editor emeritus' means.''

''The 'e-' means you've been given the elbow and the '-meritus' means you bloody deserve it,'' said Murdoch.

I have a feeling after November CBS News will be promoting Dan Rather to editor emeritus.
Posted by: mojo   2004-09-11 4:21:10 PM  

#14  We have the babes.
Posted by: Fox News   2004-09-11 4:19:33 PM  

#13  We of the holy council of CBS News declare all those charging fraud are part of the vast right-wing conspiracy. It is our feduciary duty to our stockholders to present forged documents as damaging evidence to try and unseat an un-elected president.

For justice must be achieved at any price. And, those who say that Dan Rather is "breathtakingly close" to forced retirement are nothing but a bunch of evil facists.
Posted by: CBS News   2004-09-11 4:01:08 PM  

#12  Holy cow, ed; he's donated to practically every scumbag the Donks have got!
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-09-11 3:15:48 PM  

#11  Steyn lays the smack down. I would dearly love to "A Clockwork Orange" Dan Rather and force him to hear these words over and over again until he understands who he has become and what his ilk has done to journalism as a whole.
Posted by: Chris W.   2004-09-11 3:10:03 PM  

#10  Les Moonves campaign contributions to 2000
Posted by: ed   2004-09-11 3:01:30 PM  

#9  His ethics? He wouldn't steal a red hot stove. (Hat Tip: A. Lincoln.)
Posted by: Matt   2004-09-11 3:01:12 PM  

#8  What are his ethics?

I'm not sure what you mean by this question. The guy works in network news -- it's obvious he has no ethics.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-09-11 2:50:43 PM  

#7  Everybody is focusing on Dan Rather.

But as much of a "journalistic icon" as Dan Rather is, I have my doubts whether he himself has the pull needed to get CBS to stake its entire reputation-- and maybe even its operating license?-- on this story.

What about Les Moonves, the head honcho at CBS? Common sense would suggest he oughtta be ripping Dan Rather a brand-new asshole right about now-- but apparently he is not. Is he the one behind this? What are his politics? What are his ethics?
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-09-11 2:15:05 PM  

#6  MZ: Dan Rather and his CBS cohorts were NOT duped. Rather and friends are willing participants in a massive fraud being perpetrated on a majority of the American people.

I have to agree. The media are now little more than liberalism's propaganda wing.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-09-11 2:02:37 PM  

#5  I wouldn't expect the other alphabets to hesitate to rip an tear on CBS's carcass, either. ABC's on it
Posted by: Frank G   2004-09-11 1:52:03 PM  

#4  Well, I guess this sinks any possibility of Kenneth working for The National Enquirer, America's Newspaper of Record. Maybe the NYT will pick him up as a stringer.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-09-11 1:14:58 PM  

#3  Dan Rather and his CBS cohorts were NOT duped. Rather and friends are willing participants in a massive fraud being perpetrated on a majority of the American people. I would have said on "all" American people, except that the LLL will still accept Rather's story even though it has been debunked beyond a reasonable doubt.

Recently someone else ( I forget who) wrote that the "real story" of the 2004 election will be the utter collapse of MSM. I concur most heartily with those sentitments. The blogosphere (sp ?) will crush CBS in this matter. Bank on it. Quite remarkable, don't you think?
Posted by: Mark Z.   2004-09-11 1:03:11 PM  

#2  Should be, "What's the font, Kenneth?"
Posted by: Raj   2004-09-11 12:50:36 PM  

#1  ..This just in: Rather replaced at CBS...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1212338/posts

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-09-11 12:38:46 PM  

00:00