| #3 I hope they answer the critical question: Why after the MOUNTAIN of evidence that President Bush served with honor, they pursued a story to malign this service? Why do they continue to attempt to defame his service and others that served with him? Why did they portray Col Killian as a backstabbing supervisor and a collaborator in a felony? FYI falsifying official documents and destroying official documents is still a crime in this country. If he were my father CBS and Viacom would be looking down the barrel of a VERY expensive lawsuit over defamation of character. I also think that Bush 41 has a pretty good case along these lines. Also they still have not apologized for the story, only the use of the documents. With all undue respect Mr Rather, APOLOGIZE. |