You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Howard: Tories will quit Geneva Convention
2004-09-23
MICHAEL Howard, the Conservative leader, was attacked from left and right yesterday after promising to take Britain out of a United Nations convention on refugees as part of his attempt to toughen his party's stance on immigration. As immigrant groups accused Mr Howard of trying to stir up fear over asylum seekers, the UK Independence Party said the Tory leader was trying to steal its ideas in a bid to shore up his party's flagging support. In a speech in London, Mr Howard called for parliament to set a single quota for all forms of immigration, including economic migration, family members joining British residents, and places available for people claiming political asylum.

Challenging Labour's assumptions that increased immigration will help fuel economic growth - and ignoring Scotland's particular need for immigration to offset a shrinking workforce - Mr Howard also sounded a sceptical note on the monetary benefits of immigration. But it was his pledge to withdraw from the 1951 UN convention on the treatment of refugees that caused the most controversy. The accord, part of the Geneva Convention, obliges signatories to give shelter to people fleeing persecution, and prohibits deporting would-be immigrants to nations where they could be at risk. Describing the UN convention as outdated, Mr Howard said that the current rules have helped to create an international people-smuggling industry. "Genuine refugees will be welcomed, but those who are not will be swiftly removed. This will immediately deter people from falsely claiming asylum in Britain - significantly reducing the numbers."
Posted by:tipper

#4  "...and ignoring Scotland’s particular need for immigration to offset a shrinking workforce..."

Get the udea the Scotsman is anti-Tory? It's not socialist-minded Scotland's fault it's got a shrinking workforce and needs immigrants just to wipe the dribble off the old folks' chins. Must. Somehow. Blame. Tories...
Posted by: Bulldog   2004-09-23 5:57:11 PM  

#3  ignoring Scotland’s particular need for immigration to offset a shrinking workforce

Eurabia, laddies. Only solution to the demographic debacle that awaits ye.
Posted by: lex   2004-09-23 5:19:51 PM  

#2  Maybe not Arnold.... but couldn't we change the Constitution to allow Presidents from the UK and Australia?
Posted by: Shipman   2004-09-23 5:17:19 PM  

#1  "For a state to try to create its own rules would encourage other states to create their own rules."

And this is a bad thing how? Typical drivel from one world government types. If a nation state can not determine who can come to it's territory what can it do?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-09-23 4:30:01 PM  

00:00