You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
D-Day in Samarra: 94 baddies toes-up, Turk hostage rescued
2004-10-01
U.S.-led forces stormed Samarra Friday and said nearly 100 guerrillas were killed in air strikes and street-to-street combat during a major new American offensive to wrest control of the Iraqi town. Doctors at Samarra's hospital said 47 bodies were brought in, including 11 women, five children and seven elderly men. They said ambulances could not reach many wounded as fighting, which lasted throughout the night, was still going on. A spokesman for the U.S. 1st Infantry Division said an estimated 94 insurgents were killed. He said a U.S soldier was killed during the offensive and four wounded. The U.S. military said Iraqi commandos had taken over Samarra's Golden Mosque and seized 25 rebels inside. Iraqi troops also secured the town's renowned spiral minaret.

The Interior Ministry in Baghdad said that by midday (0900 GMT) Iraqi police were in control of the center of Samarra and most surrounding areas after a joint U.S. and Iraqi operation to "remove the terrorists who have been holding the town hostage." The U.S. military says it will retake guerrilla strongholds such as Samarra, the western cities of Falluja and Ramadi and the Baghdad districts of Sadr City and Haifa Street by the end of the year so elections can go ahead in January as planned. Before dawn, troops backed by tanks pushed through the streets as guerrillas unleashed mortar attacks and fired rocket-propelled grenades and rifles from the rooftops. Sporadic fighting was still being heard in the early afternoon and electricity and water were cut off in the town of more than 100,000 people, 100 km (60 miles) north of Baghdad.

HOSTAGE RESCUED
A Turkish worker kidnapped by guerrillas had been rescued during the Samarra offensive, the U.S. military said. Dozens of foreigners are being held hostage in Iraq. A Frenchman who says he is trying to mediate for two French journalists said he was with the pair Friday and hoping to negotiate their release.

The Samarra assault began shortly after midnight with air strikes and artillery barrages pounding the mainly Sunni Muslim town, which had been a no-go zone for U.S. forces for months. The U.S. military said troops destroyed several mortar sites, rocket-propelled grenade teams and guerrilla vehicles. Overnight, guerrillas were seen unloading weapons and ammunition from two speedboats on the Tigris River in the town, the military said. Troops opened fire and destroyed the boats. "In response to repeated and unprovoked attacks by anti-Iraqi forces, Iraqi security forces and multi-national forces secured the government and police buildings in Samarra early in the morning of October 1," the U.S. military said. The military said the Samarra raid was "to facilitate orderly government processes, kill or capture anti-Iraqi forces, and set the conditions to proceed with infrastructure and quality of life improvements for the people of Samarra." A U.S. helicopter took small arms fire during the operation but made a safe landing, the 1st Infantry Division said. U.S. forces had stayed out of the city for three months, as rebels tightened their grip. The Americans moved in briefly earlier this month to try to re-establish the local government, but much of the town remained in rebel hands.

The Samarra offensive came after a day of bloodshed in Baghdad, where three car bombs were detonated near a U.S. military convoy Thursday, killing 41 people, 34 of them children rushing to collect sweets from American troops. An Internet statement claimed responsibility in the name of the Tawhid and Jihad group of Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, which beheaded two American hostages last week. The group is also threatening to kill a third captive, Briton Kenneth Bigley.

Iraq dominated Thursday's first U.S. presidential debate between President Bush and Democratic challenger Senator John Kerry. Bush insists progress is being made toward democracy in Iraq, Kerry said it was "chaos." Iraq's government has insisted that elections will go ahead as planned in January. But unless some areas are excluded, U.S. and Iraqi forces will need to re-establish control over areas held by guerrillas, and that could mean fierce fighting.
For once, I agree with Al Reuters' editorial content; though, once again, its insertion into an ostensibly objective news story is yet more evidence of the light regard the editors have for the target audience of Euro-sheep.
Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy

#27  The 100-1 seems rather consistent during offensive operations in Fallujah, Najaf 1&2, Tal Afar, the email Yesterday from a Marine in al-Anbar (3000 vs 33), and now Samara. It makes a case for staying on the offensive.
Posted by: ed   2004-10-01 10:33:31 PM  

#26  The kill ratios are amazing. I just watched Heavy Metal, a Discovery Channel Show. This episode was on the B-17. The causaulty rates for raids involving Flying Forteresses are staggering to consider.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-10-01 10:15:18 PM  

#25  Lot of comments here but...one more.

Kerry despite what he says would be a disaster for the US and Iraq. One should listen closely to what he said in the debate. Bilateral talks with Korea to neutralize their nuclear capability. This is a bad way to go. What else did Kerry say about getting Global permission to pre-empt or some such bullshit . We cannot give up this right. "W" is on the right track but not too articulate. Kerry would screw up a good wet dream as they say. He is all about his own image. I've heard it said he came back from Viet Nam because he ran out of film. One good sign in this piece is the following:

"The U.S. military said Iraqi commandos had taken over Samarra's Shi'ite Golden Mosque and seized 25 rebels inside. Iraqi troops also secured the town's renowned spiral minaret."

We are not letting religion get in the way of politics and the Iraqi commandos are coming along. I hope fast enough.
Posted by: John   2004-10-01 5:25:38 PM  

#24  Another 100:1 kill ratio day. As I've said before, I can live with this.
Posted by: molokai_man   2004-10-01 5:20:38 PM  

#23  Should Kerry win, I will advise my son to get out of the Marines as quickly as possible once his unit returns from Iraq. Kerry doesn't deserve either the allegiance or service of fighting men and women for whom he has no respect and even less concern. No point in risking your life for Kerry's global fantasies.
Posted by: RWV   2004-10-01 4:46:28 PM  

#22  Yo Ship, that's Peshawar, not Preshawar (unless I'm missing something)
Posted by: Rafael   2004-10-01 4:39:02 PM  

#21  LH Can't so I will.

PRESHAWAR! presh a war!
Posted by: Shipman   2004-10-01 4:23:58 PM  

#20  LH, I am with you, brother. You defended me when I was getting slammed and I appreciate it.

Mike is right, "most of us are good guys 'round here"

Let's not kill each other, let's kill the true trolls and moonbats.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2004-10-01 3:43:39 PM  

#19  you think thats funny ZF?

2B - wishing what. Im not the one with my head in the clouds. Im not the one who thinks either candidate is a good choice. And im also not hte one who turned a thread about whats going on in IRAQ into yet another one about the Presidential election.

Look fred has set up two pages here - one for domestic and related matters and one for the WOT as conventionally defined. Which page is this one on, pray tell?
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 3:24:11 PM  

#18  Not so tough on Bro' Hawk, there. He's one of the good guys. (Most of us are, 'round here.)
Posted by: Mike   2004-10-01 2:41:33 PM  

#17  i know this will piss you off, LH, but I can't help myself. Get your head out of the clouds. Wishing won't make it so.
Posted by: 2b   2004-10-01 2:38:51 PM  

#16  LH: Ucchh, dont make me think about it Rafael. :( Whoever I vote for, it will require a long shower afterwards.

Relax and cast away your guilt. Just vote for Kerry. After all, he's all for fighting a "smarter war", like you advocated. He'll be better with alliances, and get German and French troops into Iraq. Don't fight it - vote for Kerry and you can regain the respect of all your liberal friends.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-10-01 2:30:13 PM  

#15  Ucchh, dont make me think about it Rafael. :(

Whoever I vote for, it will require a long shower afterwards.

Or I could just write in a name.

Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 1:10:33 PM  

#14  or a Costco-sized box of SunMaid Raisins
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-01 1:01:33 PM  

#13  94 x 72 = 6,768. Wow, that's a lotta virgins...
Posted by: BigEd   2004-10-01 1:00:45 PM  

#12  Touchy Liberalhawk. BTW, who are you voting for in November?
Posted by: Rafael   2004-10-01 12:25:09 PM  

#11  I love the title .... 94 Islamo baddies toes up. The only good Jihadi is a wasted Jihadi. No mattter to me whether such scum is killing Russian, Hindu or Israeli children and civilians.
Posted by: dennisw   2004-10-01 12:24:00 PM  

#10  look ZF, you want to discuss bush and kerry, there must be lots of places in RB to do it, what with the debate and all. Can we TRY to discuss the current op in Sammara?
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 11:37:51 AM  

#9  My bet is that Kerry will go with the Vietnam / Shah of Iran solution. Establish some sort of 'truce', pull out and when the enemy (Iran/Syria) invades 'turn aside from our agreement' and refuse to help.
(Sorry, this doesn't pass the 'Global Test'....).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-10-01 11:29:34 AM  

#8  Overnight, guerrillas were seen unloading weapons and ammunition from two speedboats on the Tigris River in the town...Troops opened fire and destroyed the boats.

Here is the Soddy version:
During an all night wedding party, when the raisin sweet bread ran out, a devoted family of five were seen unloading flour and sugar from speed boats. Nearby witnesses stated the following. Then, by Allah-ha-ha, out of nowhere, the infidels yelled "we will put you pigs in a blanket" and cut down the innocent family of five, with their BIG bullets.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2004-10-01 11:28:52 AM  

#7  LH: If Kerry wins, we will need to keep pressing for victory in Iraq, to insure full support for the Iraqi govt, and a tough approach to Fallujah et al. And for a tough approach to Iran.

If Kerry wins, we get the Mogadishu scenario, where US forces pull out and lose credibility. In addition to Vietnam and Mogadishu, America's enemies will now be able to cite the example of Iraq. Republicans like Hagel and Lugar want to pull out. If Kerry pulls for a withdrawal, Republicans won't stand in his way. I can't think of a single instance where congressional majorities have stood in the way of a presidential decision to withdraw from a war. If Kerry wins, and he has coattails, maybe even Republican congressional majorities are a pipedream.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-10-01 11:15:38 AM  

#6  . All of this will be for nought if he loses on November 2.

whoever wins the election we'll still be at war, and it will still be up to all of us who care to press for the best possible approach.

If Bush wins we will need to continue to press for a smarter approach, better public diplomacy, keep supporting a commitment to nation building and democracy promotion, and to a willingness to use all available resources.

If Kerry wins, we will need to keep pressing for victory in Iraq, to insure full support for the Iraqi govt, and a tough approach to Fallujah et al. And for a tough approach to Iran. And to minimize unnecessary concessions to France.

Dont give up on Nov 2, no matter who wins.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 11:08:00 AM  

#5  I think operations like this can be a real confidence-builder. Once American commanders demonstrate that they will not waste the lives of Iraqi troops, I think they will fight as well as their ancestors once did.

But Bush needs to do more work on his debate preparations. All of this will be for nought if he loses on November 2. There is still work to be done, both on items on the conservative agenda, and the War on Terror. A Kerry win would wipe out all the gains that GWB has worked towards. Dick Lugar and Chuck Hagel need to stop grandstanding. If they persist, party activists need to find ways to boot them from office. All the fire has been directed at John McCain. But Lugar and Hagel have made the most inflammatory remarks.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-10-01 11:02:36 AM  

#4  could be a warning to Fallujah
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-01 10:52:07 AM  

#3  CNN reports over 100 insurgents killed. Report about 3000 US troops involved. 2 battalions of Iraqis would be about 1500. Going up against "several hundred insurgents" including about 60 foreigners. Some civilians fled the city in advance. Shrine secured with no damage, one hostage rescued. All going well (although there has been one US combat death). Could be the model for the attack on Fallujah.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 9:41:56 AM  

#2  shouldn't this have been the headline? Iraqi police were in control of the center of Samarra and most surrounding areas after a joint U.S. and Iraqi operation

after a joint U.S. and Iraqi operation to "remove the terrorists who have been holding the town hostage.

I guess the Reuters correspondent just couldn't bring himself to write "removED"..ie: as in PAST TENSE..already removed.. Instead he clumsily manages to get add a quote to avoid stating the job is done. haha! weak. I wonder how much time he spent trying to get that just right.

Al reuters - still trying their best to spin it. But, sigh, not much good to work with these days ..except, of course that dance on top of the civlian dead.
Posted by: 2b   2004-10-01 9:22:42 AM  

#1  AP has more info on the Iraqi forces involved in the op. The 202nd Iraqi national guard battalion, and the 7th Iraqi army battalion. They secured the bridge over the tigris, leading to the destruction of the speedboats. They also secured two important shrines in the city.
Looks like good coordination between 1st ID and the Iraqi forces.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-01 9:15:26 AM  

00:00