You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Afghanistan: Boom-free election
2004-10-09
Afghanistan's historic presidential election has closed without any of the feared large-scale violence but the vote was thrown into turmoil instead by a boycott called by most of the candidates. All 15 of President Hamid Karzai's rivals said they were withdrawing from the election because systems to prevent illegal multiple voting had gone awry. The move effectively left Mr Karzai as the only candidate in the fray. Election officials nevertheless refused to halt the process, which appeared to have gone smoothly across the rugged Islamic nation despite fears that many Afghans would be too afraid to participate. "Halting the vote at this time is unjustified and would deny these individuals the right to vote," said election official Ray Kennedy.

The impoverished nation was voting to choose its first elected president and perhaps end over a quarter-century of war. It was not immediately clear how much credibility the poll would have after the boycott or whether it would lead to further divisiveness in the country, a patchwork of ethnic groups and often warring tribes held together for the past three years by the US-backed interim government. Fears of sabotage by Taliban militants, who had vowed to disrupt the polls, were overtaken halfway through the voting day when it became clear some workers were using the wrong pen to mark people's fingers after they voted. This meant the ink could just be washed off and the voter could potentially cast a ballot again.

During the campaign, some candidates expressed surprise that as many as 10.5 million out of the country's 28 million people had registered to vote, and said they believed many people had received multiple voter cards. The indelible ink was aimed at preventing them from voting more than once. The decision by Mr Karzai's rivals to boycott the poll was made at an emergency meeting. Eighteen candidates are on the ballot but two withdrew this week in favour of Mr Karzai. Later all but one of the 15 demanded fresh polls and said they would not recognise any government elected on Saturday. The Joint Election Management Body (JEMB), a group of UN-appointed and Afghan election officials who are conducting the poll, said it would investigate the complaints but could not justify halting the vote. "The JEMB is encouraged that the voters of Afghanistan have turned out in large numbers and that the process overall has been safe and orderly," Ray Kennedy said.

Ahead of the poll, security had been the overriding worry for election organisers fearing attacks by Islamic fundamentalist Taliban militants, who vowed to disrupt what they called a US-orchestrated sham. Today there were only scattered reports of election-related violence. In the biggest incident, 24 Taliban insurgents were killed in the central province of Uruzgan after a bombing raid by US aircraft, provincial authorities said. Elsewhere some injuries were reported but no deaths. Polls opened at 7:00am and closed at 4:00pm local time, although those in the queue were allowed to vote later.
Posted by:Fred

#10  Yesterday, I was a little gloomy but the Aussie and Afghani elections and Bush's improved debate performance have me in a much better mood today.

This 'boycott' by all 15 opponents on a flimsy pretext reeks of orchestration. Who engineered this? The French? The Paki ISI? The UN? It'll be interesting to find out.

Go Bush! Go Howard! Go Karzai! Go Badgers! Beat Ohio State!
Posted by: JDB   2004-10-09 2:47:13 PM  

#9  Al Gore has dispatched a crack team of attorneys to challenge the election results, while claiming that he is now the rightful President of Afghanistan.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-10-09 1:33:59 PM  

#8  Yo AP. Agreed.
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-09 1:27:47 PM  

#7  You have the point, JQC. I saw the same thing in the 60s in the Vietnam era in Berkeley. There are people that make things happen, there are people that spout nothing but doom and gloom and depression for all, and there are people that do everything to prevent something good, even flawed as it is, from ever happening. So many of the LLL sit and grandstand, but never contribute to something positive, and therein lies the sickness.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-09 1:16:34 PM  

#6  The Afghan election must give our doom and gloom leftie Demos, the Hollywood elite, and the MSM serious heartburn. These folks are the hate America crowd--they want America to fail.
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-09 11:54:31 AM  

#5  Boom Frei!
Posted by: Elsa   2004-10-09 11:32:15 AM  

#4  This is the first election for these people. Having it at all is a success. Having it without violence is a major success. It will take many years for a real political process with parties and competitive candidates to emerge.
Posted by: Anonymous5032   2004-10-09 11:16:41 AM  

#3  This is probably the lowest violence day the Afghans have seen in the last 1000 years.
Posted by: ed   2004-10-09 10:55:56 AM  

#2  Its UN supervised. They put their imprimatur on it, its legit, right? I mean how can the LLL terror sympathizers who want the UN to run the world take exception to that? Stay tuned and find out. Whole lot of shakin and spinnin going on.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2004-10-09 10:53:46 AM  

#1  All 15 of President Hamid Karzai's rivals said they were withdrawing from the election...
Oh, that's not good--that's not going to help the legitimacy of this election. I can't believe that ALL FIFTEEN of his rivals withdrew that easily. That really puts a smear on this otherwise significant--and peaceful--event.
Posted by: Dar   2004-10-09 10:38:35 AM  

00:00