You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
U.S. finds Geneva Convention exemptions
2004-10-26
A Bush administration legal opinion says not all non-Iraqi prisoners captured in Iraq are protected by the Geneva Convention, the New York Times reports. White House officials said the opinion would allow the military and the CIA to treat a small number of non-Iraqi prisoners captured in Iraq the same way as members of al-Qaida and the Taliban captured in Afghanistan, Pakistan or elsewhere.
Some go to Gitmo, some go to Bagram and some vanish into a blackhole.
The officials outlined the opinion in response to a Washington Post report the Central Intelligence Agency had secretly transferred a dozen non-Iraqi prisoners out of Iraq in the past 18 months.
"Prisoners? What prisoners?"
In the past, the International Committee of the Red Cross and a number of human rights advocates, have criticized the administration for applying the protections of the Geneva Conventions too narrowly. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits "the deportations of protected persons from occupied territory" no matter what the motive.
But since non-iraqi prisoners were not former members of any Iraqi Army, they can't be considered prisoners of war. So, Article 49 doesn't apply, but thanks for playing.
U.S. officials said the new ruling could open the way for additional transfers on a broader scale, because the status of prisoners being held in Iraq is reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
Posted by:Steve

#8  Many of the "Geneva Conventions" that are cited are not part of the 1949 conventions and have never been accepted or ratified by the US. They don't even apply. The press is to stupid to recognize the facts. The exceptions to the 1949 conventions apply as these clowns are not part of an authentic domestic resistance, they are almost to a man are foreigners and not subject to any applicable treaty or conventions.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-10-26 6:45:12 PM  

#7  A cigarette and a blindfold would be sufficient, since NONE of these jihadis happened to sign the Geneva Conventions.
Posted by: Parabellum   2004-10-26 6:37:25 PM  

#6  You looking for a date?

at least it would be a cheap one - no dinner or movie, just a pack of smokes
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-26 5:27:05 PM  

#5  You looking for a date?
Posted by: Dallas   2004-10-26 4:28:07 PM  

#4  When does Lyndie England get off maternity leave?
Posted by: Carlos   2004-10-26 4:23:01 PM  

#3  Well DUH! I said that from the begining of the WOT. And exactly how many terrorists attacks had the Geneva Convention stopped? Golf clap for the legal eagles on this one.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-10-26 11:23:20 AM  

#2  send the fake passport to the fake address noted -job done
Posted by: Frank G   2004-10-26 11:12:48 AM  

#1  These guys easily fit under the catagory of spies, saboteurs, mercenaries, and other such scum that can be given a drum head trial and hanged on the spot without violating the Geneva Conventions. They have close to zero protection. I believe that you properly need to record whatever personal information they offer; however, this is minimal, as in name, country of origin, military rank if any, identification number if any.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-10-26 11:01:48 AM  

00:00