You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
U.S. Extends Duty in Iraq for 6,500 Troops
2004-11-01
The Army has extended by two months the Iraq tours of about 6,500 soldiers, citing a need for experienced troops through the Iraqi elections scheduled for late January. About 3,500 soldiers of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, and 3,000 from the 1st Infantry Division headquarters will remain in Iraq two months longer than planned, Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said Saturday. The purpose, Whitman said, is to ``maintain continuity of forces in the theater during the election period.''

Whitman said the extensions will result in a net addition of about 3,500 troops in the country, since replacements for the 3,000 from the 1st Infantry will delay their arrival until after the elections. Soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Division, scheduled to replace the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry, will not be delayed. Whitman said it was possible that the 3rd Infantry could accelerate its deployment if commanders in Iraq say that is necessary, but no decision has been made. The Army had scheduled 10-month deployments for the units whose tours are being extended, rather than the usual 12-month tours, to stagger the rotation of forces in and out of Iraq this winter and avoid overburdening transportation systems.

A description of the troop extensions posted on the Pentagon's Web site Saturday mentioned ``the troops' frustration'' over having their tours extended. It said some of the soldiers previously had been told they would be leaving Iraq as early as November. Instead they will stay through January. Army Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, requested the extensions in late September, and his immediate superior, Army Gen. John Abizaid, made the decision Oct. 16, the Pentagon said.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  My son's unit is guarding the prison at Camp Bucca. And thanks to the MSM's good work on behalf of the Democrats with the Abu Ghraib "scandal", his job is far more dangerous than it should be: ever since then, they have been prohibited from using **ANY** force with the prisoners-- lethal or non-lethal (like riot guns with beanbag rounds)-- except to save their own lives when in imminent danger. The PC reaction to the MSM's campaign of smearing our troops has been so extreme that the guards now are not even allowed to use profanity in the presence of the prisoners; and the only form of punishment they are allowed to use is solitary confinement-- in an air-conditioned room with cable TV.

If Kerry wins this election, expect to see a MASSIVE exodus of troops from our armed forces.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-11-01 10:34:12 AM  

#2  Ditto. My wife talked to a guardsman just back from Iraq, and he and everyone in his unit is quite PO'ed at the MSM for their stinking, treasonous coverage.
Posted by: Ptah   2004-11-01 10:14:26 AM  

#1  It is tough on married soldiers.
I've been in similar situations. When I was single I was itching for extentions. Married, I counted the days. But maybe thing have changed. My brother-in-law, who is married with a new child, and several of his friends in the Guard, just returned. And they are itching to go back. They said they felt like they had accomplished so much and didn't want to leave their new Iraqi friends hanging. And obviously they are not happy with how the press was covering them.
Posted by: Urako   2004-11-01 1:16:47 AM  

00:00