You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Japan, Constitution Amendment for Military Power Overseas
2004-11-17
Japan's draft proposal for a revised constitution presented by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has first been released, suggests the name change of its military from "Self Defense Forces (SDF)" to "Self Defense Army" and authorizes the use of military power overseas.
"Imperial Army" was thought to bring back bad memories.
This draft proposal abolishes the principles of "ban on possession of war potential" and "renunciation of war" under the current "Peace Constitution," and therefore the implementation of constitutional amendment is expected to trigger the "militarization" of Japan. According to the Yomiuri Shimbun on November 17, the LDP' research commission on the constitution confirmed the ground-breaking draft proposal. The ruling party is planning to decide on its own version of a draft of the constitutional amendment by November next year, marking the 50th anniversary of the party. The recently revealed draft proposal specifies the deployment of the "Self Defense Army," which possesses the necessary military power for individual and collective right to self defense, and the authorization of military action overseas for international contribution. Also, it stipulates the emperor as "head of Japan," Japanese flag as "national flag," and "Kimikayo" as its "national anthem," those of which had not been mentioned under the current constitution, representing the symbol of Japanese militarism. This draft proposal devised by the right-wing forces within the LDP is likely to become the source of controversy since it fully denies the cornerstones of the current constitution, the ban on war potential retention, and the collective right to self defense.
The Norks and Chinese will blow a gasket over this one. I expect the other countries in the neighborhood won't be too happy either.
Posted by:Steve

#9  They really can't pull their full weight due to an agreement that was signed a few decades ago.

However, tie this in w/Roh's whacko statements from the story above....

Ok, Roh, we're moving on out. BTW, we're renegotiating the surrender agreement.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2004-11-17 9:07:41 PM  

#8  I like it. Time for the Japanese to start pulling their weight again. It's been a long time since WWII.
Posted by: Secret Master   2004-11-17 5:16:25 PM  

#7  Did they make the Chrysanthemum the National Flower? F**k the Cherry Blossom.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-11-17 4:46:43 PM  

#6  If they are gonna change the name they could have at least made it something cool like Star Force! Admiral Wildstar reporting for duty sir!
Posted by: rjschwarz   2004-11-17 3:35:12 PM  

#5   No matter how hard I wish for it, his probably will not happen. It would be strong leverage for the U.S. when dealing with the Norks, and the Chinese. The U.S. wouldn't have to say anything about the Japanese being on our side (They already know it) and it would scare the hell out of them. The best chance for the final defeat of Communism in Asia is for Japan to force China into an arms race, forcing them to collapse. It worked with Russia, and it can work with China.
China has already begun reforming, perhaps this would expedite it. If they don't continue reforming, they crumble. Norks fall with'em, probably even before China. Either way, problem solved.
Posted by: Mike   2004-11-17 2:47:29 PM  

#4  Well, the Norks and the Chinese have had their chance to cool things. They ought to read some of those manga magazines that destroy Tokyo every 6 months - if the Japanese can 'do' that to their own cities, they ought to think about what they might they might do to enemies.

They also have quite a few nuclear power stations, so I would assume that weapons grade material is going to be readily available.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2004-11-17 2:34:56 PM  

#3  Does this mean they'll have a Self Defence Army Navy like the PLA Navy?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-17 2:05:45 PM  

#2  The Commies had their chance. Too bad, so sad.
Posted by: someone   2004-11-17 2:03:30 PM  

#1  Someone better fetch Kimmie-boy his brown pants. I think I smell something.

This is all to the Good.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-11-17 2:01:50 PM  

00:00