You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
US Spokesman Answers Questions About Cotecna and Kojo Annan
2004-11-28
From the United Nations website, a summary of "The Spokesman's Noon Briefing" on Friday, November 26. The spokesman, Fred Eckhard, speaks for UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.
Asked about a media report that Kojo Annan, the Secretary-General's son, had continued to receive payments from the Cotecna firm until early this year, the Spokesman confirmed that a journalist had inquired about that earlier this week. The United Nations had no knowledge of it, however, he said. Kojo Annan's confirmed that it was true that Kojo Annan received payments until February 2004, as part of an open-ended, no-compete contract with Cotecna.

The no-compete contract, he said in response to another question, is an arrangement in which a company can deal with a departing employee, who could set up a competing business, by making payments in exchange for that person agreeing not to compete with his former employer. He said it was standard practice, calling it a "well-known device in the industry," and asserted it was not fair to suggest that it was the same as having Kojo Annan on Cotecna's payroll.

Kojo Annan's lawyer added that the arrangement had been reported to the Independent Inquiry Committee headed by Paul Volcker. The Spokesman said he could not explain the discrepancy between this information and the earlier impression that the United Nations had, that the no-compete contract had ended in 1999. The matter, Eckhard said, was now in Volcker's hands.
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#6  Yeah, there are only so many billions you can loot from the Iraqi people. Can't have too many beaks dipped in.
Posted by: jackal   2004-11-28 10:10:18 PM  

#5  well that makes sense then, since Kojo obviously had info Cotecna didn't want released (no shit!)
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-28 4:56:21 PM  

#4  Generally, you get a no-compete on exiting when you are party to some propriatary info and the company it belongs to doesn't want you using it to steal their customers, or selling it to a competitor. Three to five years is standard, as far as I know, depending on the volatility of the info.
Posted by: mojo   2004-11-28 4:28:20 PM  

#3  All the no competes I have seen are on signing an employment contract. You don't get paid once you quit. They have a set cut off date. Paying someone no to open a competing business sounds like bribery
and though legal some places I would imagine is still fishy as hell.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-11-28 1:44:34 PM  

#2  Well, that satisfies me ...

*cough*bullshit*cough*
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-28 12:39:56 PM  

#1  Truth filter on: "They're both crooks. I can say no more." Truth filter off: blah, blah, blah
Posted by: RWV   2004-11-28 12:28:08 PM  

00:00