You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Speedy Sarko's triumphant, Americanised, takeover of Chirac's party
2004-11-29
France's main party of the Right, controlled for 28 years by President Jacques Chirac, passed into the hands of a new generation yesterday at a ceremony that bore more than a passing resemblance to a glitzy American party convention. Watched by 40,000 party faithful from across France, Nicolas Sarkozy, the former finance minister known to all as Speedy Sarko, claimed the leadership of the ruling UMP party. The event was choreographed by Mr Sarkozy's wife, Cecilia, and the party militants were not disappointed. Stars of the stage, screen and political world lined up to offer video tributes. The former Spanish prime minister, José Maria Aznar, and the leader of Germany's Christian Democrats, Edmund Stoiber, joined the actors Alain Delon and Jean Reno, and Bernard Laporte, coach of the French rugby team, to wish Mr Sarkozy well. Ever the showman, Mr Sarkozy stopped at the front row to kiss Bernadette Chirac, dispatched by her absent husband. She smiled thinly as he grabbed her hand and thrust it into the air. Next came the inevitable embrace with his wife.

While many politicians in France would be pained at this blatant Americanisation of French politics, Mr Sarkozy, an outspoken admirer of the United States, revelled in the glitz. The country's most popular politician, he promised not to disappoint those looking for change in French politics. He railed against those resigned to French decline and promised to uphold the "fighting spirit" of the Republic. "France is not a museum, not a tourist attraction. France is no longer afraid of change, it awaits it," he said.

In a television interview last week, Mr Sarkozy, 49, said he had "not the slightest idea" whether he would run for President in 2007. Yesterday, he kept up the suspense, promising to back the best man for the job. But it was clear whom the party faithful favoured. "Sarkozy is the best placed to lead the UMP to victory in 2007. Chirac would be wise not to run," said Jean-Baptiste Lahoche, 18. "This is an historic event. We are witnessing the rebirth of French politics," said Laurent Cabioch, 18.

On the one hand Mr Sarkozy sought to calm hostilities with Mr Chirac, praising Mr Chirac's stand against the United States over Iraq. But he made it clear that he would not simply toe the Chirac line. "I want to remain a free man," he said.

French protocol dictates that the president does not attend party congresses. But even from his perch in the Elysée palace, Mr Chirac - who celebrates his 72nd birthday today - could hardly have appreciated the euphoria surely heralding his fin de regne. Ironically, he asked Mr Sarkozy to read out a congratulatory note in which he counted on the younger man's "vitality, efficiency and commitment". But Rolland Cayrol, head of the polling company, CSA institute, who holds frequent meetings with Mr Sarkozy, said: "There is a sort of perfect hatred between the two." Mr Chirac has never forgiven his former protege for betraying him politically and personally. In the same week, Mr Sarkozy jilted the president's daughter and quit running his presidential campaign to join Mr Chirac's rival. But in doing so, he was merely employing the tactics of the older man, who has a long history of devouring younger rivals. "I don't know why you hold something against me that you have always done," Mr Sarkozy once told him.
Tres intéressant...
Posted by:Bulldog

#7  Won't be any change in anything but tone. Sarkozy's a gaullist no less than Chirac. He's been trashing EU competition law in order to help French multinationals swallow up foreign rivals without any competition from German or Swiss firms, and i have no doubt he'll bash the US as every French leader has done since de Gaulle's day. has nothing to do with personalities. It's all about French weakness vs l'hyperpuissance.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-29 3:51:32 PM  

#6  Sarkozy? - Hungarian ancestry? - That may explain a friendlier attitude.

Jacques the Weaselle "right-wing"...
ditto to Robert Crawford

Posted by: BigEd   2004-11-29 3:39:03 PM  

#5  Like you said, we'll see. But about Reno-yeah, I liked that part, too. He was wonderful in La Femme Nikita and French Kiss, as well as Ronin and Les Visiteurs. Great presence.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-11-29 1:05:48 PM  

#4  ChIrak is right-wing? WTF?

In France. That means he's not a card-carrying member of the Communist Party.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-11-29 12:57:46 PM  

#3  ChIrak is right-wing? WTF?
Posted by: Steve from Relto   2004-11-29 12:49:14 PM  

#2  Jules 187 - I'd say he's a politician... a French politician. Sort of like The Perfect Storm in politics. As such, his words, of course, are perfectly meaningless. Should he actually succeed Chirac in 2007, then we should judge him in the same fashion that we judge Chirac: by his actions - nothing else matters.

That Stoiber and Aznar were present for this show probably bodes very well - but I'll wait and see, heh. 2007 is a long way off, sigh.

On a personal note, I am rather tickled to see the one French actor I actually enjoy, Jean Reno, was there, too, lol! I had no idea what his political leanings were - whew! I've actually chosen to stop watching anything which contains a whole slew of Americans, the entire Hollyweird cabal of irrelevant political tool-fools, so it's only fair to do the same with the foreign actors. Nice to know he's not a moron, heh.
Posted by: .com   2004-11-29 12:22:21 PM  

#1  On the one hand Mr Sarkozy sought to calm hostilities with Mr Chirac, praising Mr Chirac’s stand against the United States over Iraq.

So how exactly did he betray him politically?

And why does Mr. Sarkozy think it good that France shirked its responsibilities in the international arena by abandoning its ally America which was making good on UN resolutions and aggressively addressing murderous tyranny? It tells us a lot about the man. If he was against the Iraq War, that would mean either 1) he is still holding onto the delusion of our time that when danger lands in your lap all you have to have are good communication skills (pacifist camp) or 2) his priority is "taking a stand against the US over Iraq" (the UN camp of anti-Americanism and antagonism). In either case, since he is against the Iraq War, that would indicate to me that he was ok with the corrupting and emasculating of the UN and was ok with "countering America" a la Chirac.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-11-29 10:29:16 AM  

00:00