You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
What part of Senate Joint Resolution 23 don't these people understand?
2004-12-02
Posted by:Don

#9  Raptor - rattlesnakes are easier to catch...

Made my spending money as a kid catching water moccasins and copperheads for a local antivenom manufacturer in Louisiana. LOTS of nice creepy-crawlies down there. Maybe we could just drop activist judges into Lafourche Swamp and see who walks out.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-12-02 10:10:56 PM  

#8   I prefer a box of scorpions(tree bark,ofcourse) 40 or 50 of the little nasties running around a judges chambers would sure get thier attention .
Posted by: raptor   2004-12-02 5:35:13 PM  

#7  Realistically we should give the majority of them back to the government in Afghanistan for trial, but we know they'd be killed so we can't do that. So we hold them because to release them would most likely mean they would rejoing the bad guys.

I wish there was some way to implant a James Bond type tracking device in a few of them and watch where they went after the were released.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2004-12-02 3:25:57 PM  

#6  O.P. So.... What the hell did rattlesnakes do to you that you would commit them to visiting moonbat judges?

Think of the poor rattlesnakes!

Personally I would like to see Bush and/or Rummy give a big fat 'F U!' to these judges....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-12-02 2:45:09 PM  

#5  There seem to be a growing number of judges in the United States that are enemies of the Constitution. I propose sending each of them a live rattlesnake a month until they either learn to read the Constitution, or nature takes its course. (As an aside, rattlesnake chili is ummm, good!)
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-12-02 2:33:26 PM  

#4  All this will do is drive more and more of our neccessary activitys on the virgin-bait terrorists underground.

Where they should have been in the first place. 9/11 forced our government to carry out many efforts in a very public way to placate victim's families and reassure the public. Now that most of the public has forgotten it's time to remove these activities from the spotlight so they can be conducted effectively without excessive legal interference.
Posted by: AzCat   2004-12-02 1:48:20 PM  

#3  "Do not annoy Mr. Happy-Fun Court..."
Posted by: mojo   2004-12-02 1:41:08 PM  

#2  All this will do is drive more and more of our neccessary activitys on the virgin-bait terrorists underground.

Obviously this so-called judge didn't lose family on 9/11. So she goes to her chambers, has her tofu shake at lunch, and worries about scumbags murderers who would have her beaten for showing her face unveiled.
Posted by: BigEd   2004-12-02 12:50:27 PM  

#1  Al-Qaida does not conduct itself in accordance with the laws of war; and therefore, under the Geneva Convention, it would be perfectly legal to summarily execute the whole lot of 'em. I'd like to see the government advise opposing counsel that if their clients do not voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit, their clients will be shot at sunrise tomorrow.
Posted by: Mike   2004-12-02 12:20:47 PM  

00:00