You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Little Arab wealth for tsunami's Muslim victims
2005-01-09
The "anaemic" financial effort made by Muslim countries towards tsunami relief has been criticised in a hard-hitting critique published on Saturday. Peter Bergen of the New America Foundation, who is CNN's expert of terrorism, and who also visited Pakistan recently points out in a New York Times column that "this anemic effort on the part of the richest countries is emblematic of a wider political problem in the Islamic world. For all of the invocations by Muslim leaders of the ummah, or the global community of believers, they typically do little to help their fellow Muslims in times of crisis. Arab leaders and their toothless talking shops like the Arab League and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference are excellent at denouncing problems in Palestine and Iraq, but most stood silent as a million died in the war between Iraq and Iran during the 1980s.
That could be because they were rooting for both sides...
Bergen writes that it is "common currency" in the Islamic world that Muslims are perpetual victims of Western and Zionist conspiracies. Yet when Muslims are suffering, it is usually the West, and often the United States, that takes the lead in helping, he notes, recalling that it was the US that came to the aid of Afghans after the Soviet invasion and it was the US that overthrew the Taliban regime. Washington again it was that sent 25,000 troops to help relief efforts in Somalia and came to the aid of the Bosnians being massacred by Serbs. He points out that other than Turkey, no Muslim nation has sent troops to Afghanistan to help stabilise the poorest country in the Islamic world.
And a year after the tsunami, they'll be rioting in the streets and burning American flags again. There's no surprise there. There's no word for "gratitude" in Arabic...
According to Bergen, "Now the same pattern - action by Western countries and inertia from Muslim states - can be seen in the efforts to provide relief for those hardest hit by the Indian Ocean tsunami. While 100,000 of the victims are from Aceh, the most Islamic of Indonesia's provinces, Muslim countries are contributing a relative pittance. Oil-rich Saudi Arabia is contributing the most: a paltry $30 million, about the same as what Netherlands is giving and less than one-tenth of the United States contribution. And no Arab governments participated in the conference in Jakarta on Thursday where major donors and aid organisations conferred over reconstruction efforts." He hopes that the generosity of Western countries will spur Islamic states to recognise that invocations of religious Muslim solidarity will do little to feed the millions of Muslims who remain acutely vulnerable to disease and starvation in the aftermath of this enormous natural catastrophe.
The fact that they're starving and their children are being sold into sexual slavery doesn't matter. What matters is that they have mosques and at least one Koran for every household. And shariah. Lots of shariah.
He adds that there have been a few positive signs in recent days that things may be changing. Spurred by criticism, Saudi state-run television organised a telethon this week that raised private pledges of more than $75 million, and the Islamic Development Bank has pledged $500 million. "Much remains to be done, however. The Persian Gulf countries that are reaping a bonanza from record oil prices should send a meaningful percentage of those windfall profits to their fellow Muslims devastated by the tsunami, rather than lining the pockets of their ruling families. After all, zakat, the giving of charity, is one of the five pillars of Islam," Bergen adds ironically.
You can't use zakat! That would take the bread out of the mouths of millions of holy men!
Posted by:Fred

#6  We also need to highlight how little Arabs care for non-Arab Muslims. Any outcry about the Kurds? About Afghan's misery? About victims of the Tsunami?

Nope. Only about Paleos.
Posted by: JFM   2005-01-09 3:39:25 PM  

#5  Zakat for foreigners? Baby needs a new pair of curly-toed slippers Mercedes limousine
Posted by: Prince Naif   2005-01-09 1:52:25 PM  

#4  ... it is “common currency” in the Islamic world that Muslims are perpetual victims of Western and Zionist conspiracies. Yet when Muslims are suffering, it is usually the West, and often the United States, that takes the lead in helping, he notes, recalling that it was the US that came to the aid of Afghans after the Soviet invasion and it was the US that overthrew the Taliban regime.

Just one more good reason that whenever Western countries are obliged to go in and clean up another Muslim trainwreck like Afghanistan, no sort of Islamist government should be allowed to retain or ascend to power afterwards.

The Persian Gulf countries that are reaping a bonanza from record oil prices should send a meaningful percentage of those windfall profits to their fellow Muslims devastated by the tsunami, rather than lining the pockets of their ruling families. After all, zakat, the giving of charity, is one of the five pillars of Islam,” Bergen adds ironically.

This sort of horseshit redlines my cynicism meter. One is forced to assume that if Islamic charity cannot be directed towards the killing of infidels, its only other allowable destination is the pockets of their corrupt mullahs and leaders. Isn't it time to rip the mask from all this blather about how the West is suppressing Islam?

The most oppressive force of all against Muslims is their own religious thugocracy. Untold bazillions of dollars flow into the Arab OPEC nations and they can barely match the donation level of a small European country. This betrayal of their own purported religious kin needs to be etched into the global awareness regarding Islam's outcry about "crusades" against it.

Until Islam steps up to the plate and behaves like a genuine charitable institution, instead of a political juggernaut, it should face serious opposition to its currently unreformed state. All signs indicate that Islam's leaders hold nothing more than a Stalinist meat-grinder attitude towards their own flock.

Until that changes, major proscriptions should accompany Islam wherever it goes.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-01-09 1:44:43 PM  

#3  Fatwa issued against Bergen in 5...4...3...
Posted by: Pappy   2005-01-09 2:01:40 AM  

#2  No worries folks. There will be plenty of money from the wahabi outreach program to build new mosques.
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-01-09 1:47:28 AM  

#1  Methinks that Muslim charity has much more in common with the "subscriptions" that ordinary Germans paid to help build battleships before WWI or the "State Loan" that Russians paid during Stalin's time than it does with the United Way.

I'm guessing that most of the swag that doesn't get consumed by holy men goes to things like the intifada and Islamic bombs. And the real beauty of living in a high-context society is that nobody has to come right out and say what the scam is. A few hints are dropped and 90% understand.
Posted by: 11A5S   2005-01-09 1:30:12 AM  

00:00