You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
In accordance with Iraqi Electoral Commission rules, Sistani will not vote
2005-01-30
Although he shaped almost every facet of today's elections, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Husseini al-Sistani has no plans to vote, one of his representatives said yesterday. The cleric leads this nation's 15 million Shiite Muslims, 60 percent of the population, and he may be the most powerful man in Iraq. But Sistani was born in Mashhad, Iran, he is an Iranian citizen, and, according to the rules of the Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq, he is not eligible to vote, the representative said. "I assure you Sayed Sistani won't vote in this election, because he doesn't meet all the required conditions as spelled out by the IECI," said Sayed Murtdha al Kashmiri, Sistani's representative in London. "He will not vote, but at the same time, Sayed Sistani obliges every Iraqi to vote in the elections."

Sistani's name has been invoked frequently throughout the campaign. Although he is not a candidate, his picture appears on campaign posters for the major Shiite slate, the United Iraqi Alliance. He also blessed that list, positioning it to win the majority of seats. And he issued a fatwa, a religious decree, that declared voting a religious duty. In Najaf, where the reclusive religious leader lives, many residents said they hoped he would vote, or at least leave home to visit a polling center today. They said they believed that his presence would energize the process and ensure that victory for the United Iraqi Alliance. "It is expected that Sayed Sistani will go out to the polling centers because the grand ayatollah urged and motivated this election. He supported the Iraqis to move forward," said Abdel Amir Kadhim Jawad, 51. "And whether he is an Iraqi or Iran citizen, his word is first and final." Kashmiri, however, said that Sistani didn't want his advocacy of the process to be interpreted as political maneuvering. "I know that Sistani doesn't seek any political position of any kind," he said.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#7  Sing along with me, "Cuz he's a Black Hat, too..."
Posted by: .com   2005-01-30 9:40:30 PM  

#6  I believe that Sistani is one of the biggest threats to the mad mullahs. If he returns to Iran, it will be under conditions they find less than pleasant.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-30 9:37:35 PM  

#5  What Sistani says about keeping state and religion separate sounds very nice. But the reality is that Sistani's influence is considerable and will remain so in the new Iraq democratic government. The Shiite religion is already flawlessly integrated into the hearts and minds of the majority of Iraqi voters. Let's be serious here. Furthermore, the relationship between Iraqi Shiite clerics is not to be ignored. Besides Sistani's Iranian birthright, consider that many Iraqi Shiite clerics found sanctuary in the bosom of Iran during Saddam's reign of terror against Iraqi Shiites.
And he issued a fatwa, a religious decree, that declared voting a religious duty.

They said they believed that his presence would energize the process and ensure that victory for the United Iraqi Alliance.

And whether he is an Iraqi or Iran citizen, his word is first and final
Posted by: 2xstandard   2005-01-30 3:03:16 PM  

#4  Cynicism aside, Sistani does not believe in injecting religion into politics. He has been remarkably consistent on this matter.
Posted by: Duke Nukem   2005-01-30 9:26:08 AM  

#3  Dishman, Sistani always claimed that he won't be interferring with the political process, at least not directly. He is a part of the branch that adheres to the concept of separation of church and state, to which the grandson of Khomeini belongs to as well (that is why Khomeini has been exiled from Iran)

In a way, he can exert a great deal of influence, but he is not directly responsible for any policies. A grey eminence of sorts. He's already got all the power he needs.
There were several attempts on his life. Who do you think was behind it ... and then ask yourself why would he return to Iran?
Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-01-30 9:16:17 AM  

#2  As long as he is for free elections,I have no problem with the guy
Posted by: Raptor   2005-01-30 9:02:26 AM  

#1  ooo.... now I understand.
It will be interesting to see him return to Iran...
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-30 3:09:41 AM  

00:00