You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
CNN's Chief News Exec Resigns Amid Furor
2005-02-12
Cause this needs to be front and center for the weekend.. Don't go bein' mean to our military .... Damn, they are so young.. A message to them, we stand with you and this was a fight from American's "silent majority" to MSM
CNN chief news executive Eason Jordan quit Friday amid a furor over remarks he made in Switzerland last month about journalists killed by the U.S. military in Iraq. Jordan said he was quitting to avoid CNN being "unfairly tarnished" by the controversy.
I agree. It should only be fairly tarnished by controversy. Peter Arnett thinks so, too.
During a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum last month, Jordan said he believed that several journalists who were killed by coalition forces in Iraq had been targeted. He quickly backed off the remarks, explaining that he meant to distinguish between journalists killed because they were in the wrong place where a bomb fell, for example, and those killed because they were shot at by American forces who mistook them for the enemy. "I never meant to imply U.S. forces acted with ill intent when U.S. forces accidentally killed journalists, and I apologize to anyone who thought I said or believed otherwise," Jordan said in a memo to fellow staff members at CNN.

But the damage had been done, compounded by the fact that no transcript of his actual remarks has turned up. There was an online petition calling on CNN to find a transcript, and fire Jordan if he said the military had intentionally killed journalists. After several management restructurings at CNN, Jordan actually had no current operational responsibility over network programming. But he was CNN's chief fix-it man overseas, arranging coverage in dangerous or hard-to-reach parts of the world. "I have decided to resign in an effort to prevent CNN from being unfairly tarnished by the controversy over conflicting accounts of my recent remarks regarding the alarming number of journalists killed in Iraq," Jordan said.

Jordan joined CNN in 1982 as an assistant assignment editor on the national news desk. CNN's global newsgathering infrastructure is chiefly the result of Jordan's work, said Jim Walton, chief of the CNN News Group.
Posted by:Sherry

#23  not buying it - there's cranks everywhere and readership is a good measure of having tour geet on the ground (DU excepted)
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-12 8:07:49 PM  

#22  Jordan got the boot because he was bad for business

Maybe, but I'm not so sure the blogosphere has achieved quite the coup that some are celebrating. Jordan had already been eased out of day to day control of news ... this was just the straw that broke his contract's back with the Time Warner biggies.

Frank, I do indeed recognize those names. But you know what? They were all very public figures when they were attacked. I have serious concerns about bloggers who take a high profile without being, say, a tenured academic or a lawyer. You can be right and still lose your house trying to defend against a lawsuit.
Posted by: too true   2005-02-12 7:52:46 PM  

#21  Doc, it aint he bloggers that are bringing down the MSM, it's their own words and actions brought to light. Everyone believed the (un)Guard story, until the story behind the story was told. Everyone jumped onthe weapons cache, sroey until the real story was told. Chief Pouting Bull was not put down by some blogger, he wrote his own article that was simply shown in the light of day. And no Eason Jordan was called for comments HE made (not soembodies writing about him) and he couldn't lie because of the hoards of witnesses. If you want to see abusive blogging, look to the many LLL site (du, indy, etc).
Posted by: Glising Thater5397   2005-02-12 6:03:13 PM  

#20  And I suppose I'm worried about what might happen if a bunch of wild-eyed liberals decide to go after a decent man just because they hate him. I don't see it happening now, but I wouldn't put any unscrupulous tactic past the left, not these days.

er.....do the names Bork, Bush, Gonzalez, Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld...mean anything to you?
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-12 4:48:32 PM  

#19  Oh, I understand perfectly - and as I said, I think what happened was what should have. I'm just expressing a little concern for the future, that's all.

And I suppose I'm worried about what might happen if a bunch of wild-eyed liberals decide to go after a decent man just because they hate him. I don't see it happening now, but I wouldn't put any unscrupulous tactic past the left, not these days.
Posted by: The Doctor   2005-02-12 4:40:33 PM  

#18  Jordan got the boot because he was bad for business. He sure did, but then its dawning on the MSM that this whole Leftist PC Agitprop schtick is bad for business when there are alternatives. The model only works when you have a monopoly
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-12 3:44:43 PM  

#17  Doc, it actually wasn't the statement, rather the cover up in MSM that did their boy in. Had he step forward when this first popped up and said "Me Bad" and apologized for slandering the men and women serving honorably, this would have blown over.
Posted by: Floting Shang5398   2005-02-12 3:41:14 PM  

#16  Doubt that will happen Doc,we've alredy been called"pajamahadin"among other things.They thought it was an insult,but bloggers took it as a compliment.After all it was pajamahadin that braught down Dan Rather and John Kerry.
Posted by: raptor   2005-02-12 2:29:52 PM  

#15  The only thing that worries me about this is what might happen when someone says something that the bloggers don't like, and they go after him and hound him until he's forced to give up - when perhaps his fate was not actually deserved.

Jordan deserved what he got, no question about it. But this, along with a number of other incidents in the past year, helps to illustrate the growing power of blogs. I just hope bloggers continue to use their power responsibly.
Posted by: The Doctor   2005-02-12 12:36:39 PM  

#14  I think the real story here is that mainstream advertisers (who pay the bills) want their ads seen by mainstream folks, not by viewers whose tin foil hats are on too tight. Jordan got the boot because he was bad for business.
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-02-12 12:02:59 PM  

#13  Here is a quote made my E. Jordan from the same article, that Fox left out.

""I have devoted my professional life to saving Saddam helping make CNN the most trusted and respected news outlet in the world, and I would never do anything to compromise my work or that of the thousands of talented people it is my honor to work alongside," he said.

I put this in the category of: "Whatever you are smoking, I want some." BTW, Enjoy the link!!
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2005-02-12 12:02:21 PM  

#12  It's Fred, the owner/operator of this beautiful rig.
Posted by: Tom   2005-02-12 10:49:39 AM  

#11  The accompanying graphics just get better and better. Excellent work, whoever you are that does that.
Posted by: Captain Pedantic   2005-02-12 10:47:58 AM  

#10  Here's the Washing Post's account from Howard Kurtz (reg required, I blogged on it if you don't want to register).

I'm left to wonder if Howard's lateness in mentioning anything about this had to do with his also having a show on CNN.
Posted by: eLarson   2005-02-12 10:21:45 AM  

#9  Pretty obvious what was in the video. Wonder if the audio includes the sounds of catcalls (in American-accented English) and kudos (in arab-accented English)...
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex)   2005-02-12 10:12:23 AM  

#8  It's long past time for the influence wielded by the fifth estate to be matched by accountability.
Posted by: gromgorru   2005-02-12 9:29:20 AM  

#7  waho! NOW THIS IS NEWS!
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-12 9:26:05 AM  

#6  If Barney Frank of all people was giving him crap about it, then its no wonder the video never turned up, his remarks were truly uncalled for. Its always a source of wonder these media elites think regular people share their views about how evil and underhanded the military is.
They are just kids doing what those people are to chickenshit to.
Seeya asswipe!
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-02-12 7:25:32 AM  

#5  And his replacement will be equally insane, but much more careful about memos, speeches, and interviews. CNN is still screwed, heh.
Posted by: .com   2005-02-12 4:50:58 AM  

#4  The days of unchallenged MSM bias are so over....and it feels gooood....
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-02-12 4:25:19 AM  

#3  But if you think the MSM was out to get blogs before, look out...


The first shots were fired a few days ago...in Maryland, a staffer for Republican governor Ehrlich had to resign after he got caught on Free Republic smearing Ehrlich's likely Democratic opponent, Baltimore mayor Martin O'Malley. There was a bit of a blog hit piece in WaPo yesterday...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-02-12 3:03:59 AM  

#2  Conflicting accounts? Even the liberal Democrats present say he said what was alleged. There is no conflict. Hasta la vista baby.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-02-12 2:33:37 AM  

#1  Wow. That was fast.

But if you think the MSM was out to get blogs before, look out...
Posted by: someone   2005-02-12 2:06:33 AM  

00:00