You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
More on the Syrian intelligence officer
2005-02-25
The bearded man in a gray jacket and shirt who appeared on the U.S.-funded Iraqi state television station Wednesday had a stark message about the insurgency -- he was a Syrian intelligence officer who helped train people to behead others and build car bombs to attack American and Iraqi troops. "My name is Anas Ahmed al-Essa. I live in Halab. I am from Syria," he said by way of introduction -- naming what he said was his home in Syria.

"What's your job?" he was asked by someone off-camera. "I am a lieutenant in intelligence." Then a second question. "Which intelligence?" The reply: "Syrian intelligence."

And so began a detailed 15-minute confession broadcast by al-Iraqiya TV, in which the man, identified as 30-year-old Lt. Anas Ahmed al-Essa, said his group was recruited to "cause chaos in Iraq ... to bar America from reaching Syria. We received all the instructions from Syrian intelligence."

The man appeared in the propaganda video along with 10 Iraqis who said they had also been recruited by Syrian intelligence officers. Later, al-Iraqiya aired another round of interviews with men it said were Sudanese and Egyptians who also trained in Syria to carry out attacks in Iraq. Syrian officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the claims, which were not possible to authenticate independently. Iraqi officials also were unavailable for comment after the broadcasts, which aired late in the evening.

The videos were broadcast as the Bush administration steps up pressure on Syria to stop meddling in Iraqi affairs by allowing insurgents to cross into the country to fight coalition troops and by harboring former Iraqi regime members. Syria has denied the charges. Wednesday was the first time the channel showed someone it claimed was a Syrian intelligence officer. All those interviewed in the first video apparently were detained in the northern city of Mosul. It was not known where the interviews were made, and no date was provided.

A man identified as one of al-Essa's aides, Shehab al-Sabaawi, said the group used animals for training in beheadings. Al-Essa said it required "at least 10 beheadings" for a member to be promoted to a group leader. "I had to send a report to Syria about how the operations are going," he said. Weapons, explosives and equipment were all provided by Syrian intelligence, the man claimed, adding that group members received $1,500 a month.

Al-Essa said money was his motive for accepting an offer by a Syrian intelligence colonel he identified as Fady Abdullah to carry out attacks inside Iraq. "I was trained on explosives, killing, spying, kidnapping ... and after one year I went to Iraq with Fady Abdullah," al-Essa said. He claimed he infiltrated Iraq in 2001, about two years before the U.S. invasion, because Syrian intelligence was convinced that American military action loomed.

An unidentified Iraqi officer introduced the video, saying all insurgent groups in Iraq were covers for Syrian intelligence. He named a number of well-known groups, including one which has killed and beheaded foreigners. Al-Essa claimed to be leader of the al-Fateh Army, a group that had not been heard of previously. Al-Sabaawi described himself as a former lieutenant colonel in Saddam's army. He said he was recruited at an Iraqi mosque in 2001 by an Iraqi man named Abu Bakr, whom he described as the al-Fateh Army's leader. "He offered to take us on a training trip to Islamabad," the Pakistani capital, al-Sabaawi said. "He told us that we could develop our skills, give us information about how to make car bombs and carry out kidnappings."

Before returning to Iraq, al-Sabaawi said he spent 11 months in Pakistan. He did not say who trained him there. After Saddam's fall in 2003, al-Sabaawi said he spent a month in Syria, where he claimed to have received training from Syrian intelligence on how to behead hostages. "Syrian intelligence officers were supervising our training. We were ready to fight the Americans because any Iraqi and any Muslim can't live under occupation," he said.

Afterward, he crossed the border and carried out attacks against U.S. military targets. He said the group started by making car bombs targeting American troops and Iraqi National Guardsmen before beginning a campaign of kidnapping and beheading Iraqis. The Sudanese and Egyptian nationals in the video broadcast later in the day did not belong to al-Fateh, the station said.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#8  remember getting Syria out of Lebanon (all the way out, the intell guys as well as the ground pounders) has major implications. It leaves Hezbollah out in the cold in a largely hostile (IIUC) Lebanese polity, and takes away much of Syrias leverage over Israel, and ability to interfere with the peace process.

OTOH that doesnt help us much in Iraq. Although a weaker and more isolated Syria, without Lebanon, may be more careful. And will have less direct benefit from an Iranian alliance. Might be more possible to turn Syria in that instance - think Libya, rather than Iraq or Ukraine.

Syrian internal democracts are coming slowly out of the wood work, but Syrian opposition is likely to be mainly (sunni) Islamist. While there are arguments for letting them rule, and holding them to responsible behavior, I dont know if Bush-Condi et al will take that chance. I also doubt that France would support it (dont snicker - france cooperation with the US on Lebanon is quite important, and a real danger to Syria) and Im not too sure Sharon would support it at this point - better a chastened Assad than an unpredictible Muslim Brotherhood, with the peace process at a delicate stage.

MHWs point about a reform military govt is good though - i know too little about the internal politics of the Syrian military/security establishment to comment.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-02-25 11:13:53 AM  

#7  It's not like Bush needs more information that Syria is run by bad men. I have to believe Bush has a plan for them and it will play out. Why detract from the European trip by blowing this out of proportion now when it really won't change anything?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-25 10:51:05 AM  

#6  Chuck
Yes we are quiet about Syrian work in Iraq - much quieter than we could be.

There are a number of factors here.

1. As you say the Alawites are a small minority - maybe 10% of the population and they are are the controlling force. Perhaps another 5% of the country are mainline Shiites who sympathize with the Alawites (who in turn are an offshoot of Shiitism).
2. The Syrian govt is not totalitarian and not Islamic. You can critize the govt (although not the leader). You can even critize Islam (people from Saudi Arabia consider Syria the land of religious liberty).
3. We may be waiting for an Iraqi govt to put together a solid case against Syria for presentation at the UN.
4. Some of the confessions have goofy details in them that make you distrust the whole thing and we may not have evidence in the form of monitary transactions or corroberation.
5. Syria isn't the only country playing dirty in Iraq. There is Iran and the Saudis.
6. We may be counting on getting Syria out of Lebanon as a first step toward weakening the Assad regime after which we could hope he would be replaced by a 'reform' military govt.

I could go on and on and on.
Posted by: mhw   2005-02-25 10:38:56 AM  

#5  mhw, it seems we're being very, very quiet about Syria all the while denying that we're going to attack Iran.

Syria is another Arab state ruled by a small minority to the detriment of the majority. Maybe we've discovered a new meme. Majority rule.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2005-02-25 10:14:10 AM  

#4  Is Pakistan going to become the new Afghanistan? (boot-camp for jihad).
Posted by: shellback   2005-02-25 9:55:25 AM  

#3  This kind of behavior by Syria should be condemned by all governments. In a lot of ways, it is worse than the assasination in Lebanon.

However, even the US hasn't condemned it yet, perhaps because the info isn't verified.

If the Iraqis had an operating govt and a capable armed forces with offensive capacity, this Syrian work would be an act of war. Of course, if Iraqi had the govt and army, Syria wouldn't do this.

Posted by: mhw   2005-02-25 9:16:00 AM  

#2  Since Iraq now has an elected goverment, is'nt this an act of war?
Posted by: plainslow   2005-02-25 8:44:23 AM  

#1  Santa is getting lots of intel on who is being naughty. Assad aint gonna make it to 2006 alive.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-25 8:40:47 AM  

00:00