| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq-Jordan |
| Revenge killings in Iraq on the rise |
| 2005-02-26 |
| BAGHDAD, Iraq - Shiite Muslim assassins are killing former members of Saddam Hussein's mostly Sunni Muslim regime at will and with impunity in a parallel conflict that some observers fear could snowball into civil war Not if everybody on one side is dead. The war between Shiite vigilantes and former Baath Party members is seldom investigated wonder why and largely overshadowed by the mostly Sunni insurgency Good cover. The U.S. military is preoccupied with hunting down suicide bombers and foreign terrorists, and Iraq's new Shiite leaders have little interest in prosecuting those who kill their former oppressors or their enemies in the insurgency. That's a darn shame. Call Amnesty International The killings have intensified since January's Shiite electoral victory, and U.S. and Iraqi officials worry that they could imperil progress toward a unified, democratic Iraq. "It's the beginning, and we could go down the slippery slope very quickly," said Sabah Kadhim, a spokesman for the Interior Ministry. "We've been so concerned with removing terrorists and Islamists that this other situation has reared its ugly head. Both sides are sharpening their knives. The difference is the Shiite's are dull from lack of use and the Sunni's are dull from over use" Since the Jan. 30 elections, Shiite militants have stepped up their campaign to exact street justice from men who were part of the regime that oppressed and massacred members of their sect for decades. While Shiite politicians turn a blind eye, assassins are working their way through a hit list of Saddam's former security and intelligence personnel, according to Iraqi authorities, Sunni politicians and interviews with the families of those who've been targeted. And the problem is? Former Baathists have responded Right, until those nasty Shiites started these wanton killings the Sunnis were just sitting in their homes knitting. in kind, this month killing several Shiites allied with major political factions. Cases under investigation include the killings of two Shiite militiamen outside a popular restaurant in Baghdad a week ago and the deaths of three Shiite militiamen who were in police custody. In a tactic borrowed from Sunni insurgents, Shiite militants have begun distributing printed death threats. One leaflet that lists several former Baathists targeted for assassination says: "We have given you the chance to repent for your crimes against the people of this country, but we have noticed during surveillance that you are instead trying to restore the glory of the atheist, corrupt Baath Party." Fair warning. There's more. |
| Posted by:Mrs. Davis |
| #9 Payback's a bitch aint it? |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2005-02-26 11:26:34 PM |
| #8 I'll tell you what...... It there was a sorry, no-good son-of-a-bitch, living in my neighborhood, who had killed my brother/sister/father/mother/uncle/......., YOU CAN BET YOUR SWEET ASS I'D KILL/TORTURE THAT MOTHERFRECKLE.....AS PART OF THE HEALING PROCESS. The people MUST be able to "exact their pound of flesh." It is part of the circle. |
| Posted by: Tom Dooley 2005-02-26 10:59:41 PM |
| #7 Okay, let me get this straight: Clause A: When the Sunnis (party of the first part) were supporting the terrorists (agents of the party of the first part) as they attacked the Kurds and the Shiites (parties of the second and third parts), it was NOT a civil war. Clause B: BUT, when the Shiites (party of the third part) start attacking the Sunnis (party of the first part) in REVENGE for Sunni support of their former leaders and employees (agents of the party of the first part) while they attacked the Shiites (Actions taken by party of the third part in Clause A), NOW it's civil war? Consequences. Liberals abhor them... |
| Posted by: Ptah 2005-02-26 8:03:57 PM |
| #6 *Yawn* Let me know when they do something I give a rat's ass about. Ship, you are on a roll! ;-p |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2005-02-26 6:59:27 PM |
| #5 I am trying to see how this is a bad thing? I know it's not good for maintaining "law and order" but there isn't much of that most places. I see this as self regulation. |
| Posted by: FlameBait 2005-02-26 6:32:05 PM |
| #4 At the very least, don't stand downhill of him :-) |
| Posted by: Steve White 2005-02-26 5:39:58 PM |
| #3 when Ship gets on a roll : stay back! |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-02-26 4:41:55 PM |
| #2 LOL! You rule today, Shipman! |
| Posted by: Sobiesky 2005-02-26 4:27:37 PM |
| #1 What about the Sunni baby Ducks? Is there no end to this quackmire? |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-02-26 4:22:49 PM |