You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Roh Says No to Greater USFK Role in Northeast Asia
2005-03-08
President Roh Moo-hyun has come out against the United States Forces in Korea (USFK)'s planned transformation into a Northeast Asian rapid deployment force. "The clear thing is that our citizens will not become embroiled in Northeast Asian conflicts without our consent," he said before a graduation ceremony of the Air Force Academy's 53rd class.

A high-ranking Cheong Wa Dae official said Roh's comments were a matter of principle and ways of setting them down formally were being studied in consultation with the U.S. The government also wants to make it mandatory for Washington to get prior consent from Korea when moving USFK forces elsewhere. Korea and the U.S. started discussion of the issue during the Security Policy Initiative (SPI) talks held in Seoul on Feb. 3, agreeing to decide it as soon as possible. Korea's position is that while some U.S. troops could be deployed from the peninsula to places of no immediate threat to Korea's security like Iraq, the USFK would not be allowed to intervene in matters with potentially grave consequences for regional security in Northeast Asia, such as the China-Taiwan standoff.

Washington is not keen on such restrictions and takes a dim view of getting prior consent from the Korean government when moving USFK forces off the peninsula. President Roh's statement is being read as a message to the U.S. confirming Korea's views in a contentious matter.
Posted by:tipper

#9  North Korea has zero chance of successfully invading SK. In reality, it will be the South Koreans who will counterattack and take the whole of the North. The downside is that SK will lose a good portion of Seoul and its population. The only way the outcome will change is if China invades on the side of the NK again. Even then, I think it will be more psychological, as the Koreans are scared shitless of the Chinese, than a military imbalance.

Still, I have had enough the the Koreans and it is time to take away the US security blanket and let the South Koreans live or die with the consequences of their actions.
Posted by: ed   2005-03-08 6:22:35 PM  

#8  As much as I hate to say it, we need to keep a presence in the Land of the Morning Calm, if only as a tripwire. Kim Jong-il is crazy enough that his troops would be across the border as the last US troop ship was pulling out of port. We don't need a shooting war in that part of the world.

That said, the tripwire force doesn't have to be particularly numerous.
Posted by: RWV   2005-03-08 6:10:43 PM  

#7  AP, I agree with you except that I think the US bears 50% of the responsibility. For about 10 years we have acted toward the SKors like the parent who won't let the last child leave home. If we would just pick up the troops and leave they could deal with their problems however they want. If they want to be annexed to China, it's OK with me. I'd be more concerned about the reaction of the Japanese than anything else.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-03-08 5:05:43 PM  

#6  Roh cannot have it both ways. He cannot have our protection while playing footsies with the Norks behind our backs (in front of our backs?!). I do not think that Mr. Rumsfeld or President Bush likes to be jacked around like this. I sure do not.

I also do not know what the big deal is about having the Norks fall and having to rebuild NK. I am sure that the cost would not be borne solely by the SKors (if they are smart). 1/3 of the problem is with the Norks, 1/3 with the Chicoms, and 1/3 with the SKors. My 2 cents.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-03-08 4:51:29 PM  

#5  "The clear thing is that our citizens will not become embroiled in Northeast Asian conflicts without our consent," he said before a graduation ceremony of the Air Force Academy’s 53rd class.

I have a better idea: United States Forces are not to become embroiled in ANY Northeast Asian conflict, PERIOD, and are to be totally and promptly removed.

How's them apples?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-08 12:16:23 PM  

#4  We have other places where the troops left in South Korea can be gainfully employed. BRAC list comes out in May, hopefully most of Korea will be on it.
Posted by: RWV   2005-03-08 12:03:56 PM  

#3  Move them out.

We don't mind you upsetting every else's apple cart, just not ours.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-03-08 11:17:20 AM  

#2  We don't need their permission if we're taking them off the peninsula for good.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-03-08 10:35:20 AM  

#1  Smells like Turkey... without the trimmings.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-08 10:09:21 AM  

00:00