You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Iraq-Jordan
US House seeks to stop funds for new Iraq embassy
2005-03-16
The US House of Representatives on Tuesday sought to block the Bush administration from using funds in an emergency war spending bill to build an embassy in Baghdad, a move that could delay construction. The House voted 258-170 in favor of a measure, introduced by a Republican, that would stop the money being used for embassy construction, maintenance and security. House supporters of the amendment to the $81 billion spending bill argued that building an embassy could not be considered an emergency. They said because of the tight fiscal situation and record budget deficit it should be considered through the regular budget process later in the year.
I dunno, it's got to get built at some point.
President George W. Bush asked for $658 million for the embassy but lawmakers cut it back last week to $592 million. The Senate, which is expected to take up its version of the bill in April, would need to back the same measure for it to become law. The House is expected to easily pass its bill on Wednesday. "We need an embassy in Iraq but we've always known we need an embassy in Iraq, so why did it come in an emergency bill," said North Carolina Republican Rep. Sue Myrick. The decision is a blow to the Bush administration which argues that the funds need to be released quickly so building could get under way. "We must begin construction of this compound as soon as possible in order to improve the safety and security of our employees," the White House budget office said in a statement.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  Verlaine,

In the past its been traditional (security, access, etc.) to group embassy's and consulate's, more or less together in urban areas. (w/exceptions of course)

Given the state of communication technology today you would hope they would build the new embassy on the outskirts of Baghdad. Maybe near the airport. It would favor security and have less road congestion.

You guys deserve better cover than trailers..I hope you have a bunker close by.

Thanks again for your service..my family and everyone I know appreciates it big time!!!

BTW....I'd like to bid on a 3 million dollar sand-bag and plywood job.
Posted by: Rick   2005-03-16 2:25:51 AM  

#1  Can't see how the new place would be much safer or secure than this Palace is, in the current circumstances. Of course indirect fire will fade away as the "insurgency" is finished off, so any facility will be more secure as time goes on. I think it's more of a diplomatic emergency in the making -- down the road, whenever the Iraqis start to get their act together, our presence in this place is going to suddenly be an issue. Sort of wrapped up with the whole Green Zone problem.

Heck, I'd settle for $3 million in emergency funds to put a sand-bag and plywood cover on our trailers to make them less vulnerable to mortar and happy fire .....
Posted by: Verlaine in Iraq   2005-03-16 12:17:34 AM  

00:00