You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
8.2 Quake hits Sumatra - Tsunami Warning Up Again
2005-03-28
Posted by:Frank G

#19  Just wait 'til Earth Day.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2005-03-28 7:19:44 PM  

#18  A co-worker pointed out that the first one was the day after Christmas ... this one the day after Easter.

So ... was this done *by* Christians? Or *against* Christians?

Because, you know, it wasn't an oddly coincidental naturally occuring thing -- no matter what you think!!

;-)
Posted by: ExtremeModerate   2005-03-28 5:23:20 PM  

#17  slip-strike fault relieving pressure and tension brought about by the lawsuits from the first quake...

:)
Posted by: Shipman   2005-03-28 5:04:44 PM  

#16  Yes and...maybe.
Posted by: Halliburton: Earthquake/ Tsunami Division   2005-03-28 4:24:55 PM  

#15  It's cuz Halliburton employs werewolves to run the thing.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-03-28 4:19:44 PM  

#14  the Halliburton Tsunami machine works best under those conditions
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-28 4:14:52 PM  

#13  Does anyone notice that many of these quakes occur Full Moon +/- 2 days...

The sun pulls one way, and the moon, the opposite...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-03-28 3:55:17 PM  

#12  9.0 is about 2.8x an 8.7....
Posted by: BigEd   2005-03-28 3:43:21 PM  

#11  prolly just a slip-strike fault relieving pressure and tension brought about by the lawsuits from the first quake...
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-28 3:39:28 PM  

#10  8.7 is one righteous release of energy! And this followed the 9.0 of 12/26/04. The '64 Alaska Good Friday earthquake was 9.2.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-03-28 3:18:58 PM  

#9  USGS now says 8.7
Posted by: BigEd   2005-03-28 3:15:32 PM  

#8  IIUC, that particular section of fault had a lot of stress on it because of the 12/26 quake. This quake was predicted.
We'll see if it was actually enough to relieve the pressure.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-03-28 2:12:38 PM  

#7  If my HS Geometry is reasonable, this one looks to be about 170 miles SE of the 9.0 on Dec 26...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-03-28 12:52:44 PM  

#6  N.B.: That warning is for the Pacific Ocean, not the Indian Ocean (just like last time)

This earthquake struck at just after midnight...a scary dark time to get shaken out of bed, if you ask me. The moon is close to full though...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-03-28 12:26:49 PM  

#5  ... TSUNAMI INFORMATION BULLETIN ...
THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THERE IS NO TSUNAMI WARNING OR WATCH IN EFFECT. AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

ORIGIN TIME - 1610Z 28 MAR 2005
COORDINATES - 2.3 NORTH 97.1 EAST
LOCATION - NORTHERN SUMATERA INDONESIA
MAGNITUDE - 8.5

EVALUATION

THIS EARTHQUAKE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE PACIFIC. NO TSUNAMI THREAT EXISTS TO COASTLINES IN THE PACIFIC.
WARNING... THIS EARTHQUAKE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO GENERATE A WIDELY DESTRUCTIVE TSUNAMI IN THE OCEAN OR SEAS NEAR THE EARTHQUAKE. AUTHORITIES IN THOSE REGIONS SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS POSSIBILITY AND TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION. THIS ACTION SHOULD INCLUDE EVACUATION OF COASTS WITHIN A THOUSAND KILOMETERS OF THE EPICENTER AND CLOSE MONITORING TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR EVACUATION FURTHER AWAY.
Posted by: Steve   2005-03-28 12:18:40 PM  

#4  Yay, another catastrophe I won't be donating money for.
Posted by: BH   2005-03-28 12:11:53 PM  

#3  OK, people, now when you see the tide running out and the fish flapping around, are you going to make all speed inland and/or to higher ground?
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2005-03-28 12:04:00 PM  

#2  Lots of volcanic activity at the edge of those plates in Kamchatka, too.
Posted by: too true   2005-03-28 12:02:04 PM  

#1  Quake Map
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-28 11:56:23 AM  

00:00