You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
French hostility to EU treaty deepens in polls
2005-04-05
PARIS, April 5 (AFP) - Three more opinion polls Tuesday showed opponents of the EU's new constitution winning France's referendum on May 29. Over the last two weeks a total of nine surveys have put the "no" camp in front, at between 51 and 55 percent of voters. An Ipsos poll in Le Figaro newspaper Tuesday put opposition to the constitution at 52 percent; a CSA poll for France 3 television put it at 53 percent; and Louis Harris for Liberation newspaper gave the "no" 54 percent. The slim positive news for President Jacques Chirac and other supporters of the constitution was that in the first two polls the number of "no" voters fell by two points from similar surveys a week before. The polls also indicated that between a quarter and a third of people who intend to cast a vote are undecided - with a majority of these tending towards a "yes" vote.

Opposition to the EU's constitutional treaty spread across France with sudden rapidity in the second half of March, fed by a groundswell of anti-government feeling and unease about the country's future in the expanding bloc. The sharpest growth in "no" votes has been on the political left. According to Ipsos, 53 percent of Socialist party (PS) voters are planning to vote against the constitution, despite an official recommendation from the leadership to vote "yes". "The 'no' vote has become fashionable," said the left-wing Liberation newspaper Tuesday. "It is as if saying 'no' to the constitution is the best way to express one's fears over a future that appears more and more uncertain."

The constitution is intended to streamline decision-making in the 25-member union, but will not come into effect unless it is ratified in every country. A rejection in so important a country as France would stop it in its tracks. Chirac had intended to enter the fray on Thursday in a televised discussion with young people, but the appointment was pushed back by a week so the president can attend Pope John Paul II's funeral in Rome. On Tuesday the constitution was to be the subject of a debate in the lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, where a large majority of deputies are in favour. Chirac's Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) supports the constitution, with just a handful of dissidents, as does its ally the Union for French Democracy (UDF). The opposition PS is in favour - but has a substantial minority who are opposed - and so are the Greens. The only parliamentary group that rejects the constitution is the Communist party.
Posted by:Steve

#6  The stupid thing is: The Constitution isn't exactly a brilliant piece, but if it fails, Europe falls back to Nice.
France will try to embrace Germany even more.
God is it 2006 yet? Although Schroeder might still fall before that.
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-04-05 8:05:33 PM  

#5  "The 'no' vote has become fashionable," said the left-wing Liberation newspaper Tuesday.

AC? Thoughts?
Posted by: Shipman   2005-04-05 5:36:36 PM  

#4  The US should push France to give up its Security Council seat to the EU before this election. Come one Chiraq, let's see a gesture to "One Europe" here.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-04-05 3:30:59 PM  

#3  And don't forget to mention "access to free placement services" when reading the "Fundamental Human Rights" listed in the EU Constitution...
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-04-05 3:23:58 PM  

#2  Beautiful language. You just don't see much truly first-class gobledygook anymore...
Posted by: mojo   2005-04-05 2:47:43 PM  

#1  The obvious solution is for Chirac to arrange for the full text of the constitution to be read on French television, so that the French people will be caught up in the majesty of its language, such as:

"After consulting the European Parliament and after discussion in the European Council, the
Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt a European decision establishing which Member States with a derogation fulfil the necessary conditions on the basis of the criteria set out in paragraph 1, and shall abrogate the derogations of the Member States concerned."

Kind of gets you all teared up, doesn't it?
Posted by: Matt   2005-04-05 2:04:00 PM  

00:00