You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Marine cleared over Falluja death
2005-05-05
A US marine filmed shooting an injured Iraqi in Falluja acted in self-defence and will not face a court martial, a Marine Corps investigation has found.
The five-month investigation found that the shooting had been "pretty much consistent with the established rules of engagement", a spokesman said.
Just like we thought.
Video of the killing last November, which was taken by a US cameraman, was flashed around the world. It came during a bloody operation to recapture the rebel-held city.
In sworn statements, the unnamed marine corporal said he had shot three insurgents in self-defence in the mosque on 13 November, believing they posed a threat to him and his fellow marines. Cameraman Kevin Sites said in his weblog account of the shooting that the marine could have legitimately believed the man posed a danger but he asked whether standards had been lowered.
Nah, we did the same during Vietnam, Korea, WWII, WWI, etc. Hell, I'm sure a Centurion would have put a spear into a wounded Carthaginian he thought was hiding a dagger.
Posted by:Steve

#1  We need to take another look at the whole embedded reporter thing. A soldier or marine distracted about what an embedded reporter is doing could be a fatal distraction in a combat situation. The mission comes first. In WW2, embedded reporters and combat cameramen were made part of the ranks, IIRC. That means that they were subject to the same rules as the military they were covering.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-05-05 10:56  

00:00