You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Has a Plan for Tank Transformation
2005-06-02
June 2, 2005: One reason Iran, despite it's attempts to create nuclear weapons, wants to make nice with the European Union, is so that the Iranian tank force can be upgraded. Currently the Iranians have about 2,000 tanks, all of them rather out of date, poorly equipped and not in the best of repair. The Iranians have a plan. There are many excellent upgrades available for older tanks, and they want access to the European firms that do this work.
The largest assortment of upgrades are available for the Russian T-72 tank. Iran has about 900 of these, of several models from the 1970s through the early 90s. The next most common tanks are nearly 600 T54/55 T-59: (a 1950s design). Upgrades are also available for this one. The rest of Iran's tanks are an odd assortment of vehicles not present in sufficient numbers to do upgrades. These include 75 Russian T-62s (not much better than the older T-55), 100 Shir Irans. These are locally developed, from the 1970s project based on the Chieftain (1960s vintage British tank). There are also 150 American M-60A1 (1960s era tank), 168 M-47s (1950s era American tank), and 100 Zulfigar (a locally designed tank, not as good as the T-72).
The principal upgrades are improved fire control (computerized, with laser range finder), more armor (ERA, which is explosive reactive armor) and better ammo (the Chinese even sell depleted uranium shells). Improved communications gear is another useful upgrade, as well as new engines and the replacement of many other parts that have worn out after two decades of embargoes.
Iran often talks about, and acts on, efforts, to build its own tanks. Two efforts at this have been dismal failures (although Iranian media said otherwise, professionals in the Iranian, and foreign militaries know better.) Buying new tanks in any quantity is not possible, but upgrades are. With these upgrades, Iran will dominate most local forces. Only the United States, and its thousands of M-1 tanks, would remain a threat. But that's what the nukes are for.
Posted by:Steve

#8  It's the nukes I'm more concerned about - "tanks are tactical, nukes are strategic" and all that.
Posted by: Edward Yee   2005-06-02 21:18  

#7  nice handles and linings for these coffins would be a step up
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-02 21:11  

#6  I was under the impression that some of the Israeli firms did the best tank refurbishments.

Maybe they should switch relationships?
Posted by: 3dc   2005-06-02 19:58  

#5  Iran Has a Plan for Tank Transformation

By incredible coincidence so does the USAF
Posted by: badanov   2005-06-02 17:18  

#4  Superior Perisan crew training will make up for the deficits noted.


/rite
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-02 15:15  

#3  Soviet tanks are good primarily to intimidate your own population. They don't have the air superiority required to stand a chance against the US. Upgrade all you want.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-06-02 14:57  

#2  Pretty much. Even with the upgrades, their tank forces suck money butt. Turkey has upgraded tanks, the Saudis have M1A2s and apachies, the Afgans have us and the Iraqis will soon have much better stuff.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-02 13:17  

#1  IIRC most of those Russian tanks are the so-called 'Jack in the Box' variety, right?
Posted by: Raj   2005-06-02 13:10  

00:00