You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
U.S. VP's Vituperation against DPRK's Supreme Headquarters Rebuked
2005-06-03
The official word from the horses mouth.
Pyongyang, June 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry gave the following answer to a question raised by KCNA Thursday as regards U.S. Vice President Cheney's vituperation against the supreme headquarters of the DPRK: On May 30 Cheney has gone so imprudent as to let loose vituperation against the supreme headquarters of the DPRK, once again revealing his inveterate intention not to recognize the DPRK.
KCNA Word of the Day: "vituperation".
Cheney is hated as the most cruel monster and blood-thirsty beast as he has drenched various parts of the world in blood.
It is the unshakable will of the people and army of the DPRK never to pardon anyone who dares hurl slanders and calumnies at their supreme headquarters but to mete out a stern punishment to him.
We know where you live, Cheney!
The DPRK has already called attention to the U.S. administration's mandarins' unabated pressurizing remarks intended to create confusion even after the May 13 New York contact at which the latter's side formally informed the former's side of its will to recognize the DPRK as a sovereign state and not to invade it. And it has since closely followed up the subsequent development.
What is it with them and that "mandarin" shit?
Those remarks made by Cheney at a time when the DPRK-U.S. New York contact has kicked off in the direction of resuming the six-party talks clearly indicate his inveterate rejection of the political system in the DPRK and his intention to put the brake on the process of the six-party talks.
The DPRK-U.S. New York contact? PDiddy? Steinbrenner?
The remarks of Cheney, boss of the hawkish hard-liners, revealed the true colors of this group steering the implementation of the policy of the Bush administration. We feel once again what good job we have done when we have stood in the stand-off with such hawkish hard-liners over the nuclear issue and the issue of the six-party talks.
More ditch water with your tree bark? Little more barnyard grass on the side?
What Cheney uttered at a time when the issue of the six-party talks is high on the agenda is little short of telling the DPRK not to come out for the talks. The United States should clearly know that the DPRK, a dignified independent and sovereign state, has never moved under any pressure. We are strong enough to defy the pressure.
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm...enriched uranium! Sprinkled with White Slag!
It was none other than the U.S. that compelled the DPRK to have access to nukes. It is, therefore, quite preposterous for the U.S. to take issue with this. Consistent is our stand to maintain the goal of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula and seek a negotiated peaceful solution to the issue. But if the U.S. persists in its wrong behavior, misjudging our magnanimity and patience as a sign of weakness, this will entail more serious consequences.
Denuclearizing the peninsula by nuclearizing it. I'm sure that makes sense to somebody.
If the U.S. has a real intention to peacefully settle the nuclear issue through dialogue, it should retract its remarks such as "outpost of tyranny" and provide a justification and conditions necessary for the resumption of the talks.
"Outpost of elevator shoe wearing lunatic midgets" maybe?
Posted by:tu3031

#13  OK, whiprash it is. It even has a cool double entendre (pardon my french).

Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-06-03 17:19  

#12  .com, whiprash is what you get when you're ronery and you ...

well, never mind.
Posted by: anon   2005-06-03 16:04  

#11  Lol, Xb - well said!

[blantant piggybacking]
Wouldn't that be "whiprash"?

Sorry, couldn't resist.
Posted by: .com   2005-06-03 15:42  

#10  I love the multiple-personality ranting, alternating between pseudo-intellectual and schoolyard taunting.

From: "... let loose vituperation against the supreme headquarters of the DPRK, once again revealing his inveterate intention ..."

To: "Cheney is hated as the most cruel monster and blood-thirsty beast ..."

Back to: "... anyone who dares hurl slanders and calumnies at their supreme headquarters but to mete out a stern punishment ..."

I think I got a whiplash.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-06-03 15:37  

#9  Oooh, I gotta get some too. I've got a brisket I need to wrap.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-06-03 12:39  

#8  Get the extra thick kind.
Posted by: too true   2005-06-03 11:31  

#7  DB:
He's still head of Haliburton. You don't actually believe that he "resigned," do you? That's what they want you to think.

Gotta go: Safeway is having a sale on store-brand aluminum foil.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-06-03 11:28  

#6  Tkat, that's because it IS the "under-the-breath mutterings of a paranoid schizophrenic shambling up the street talking to the sky".
Posted by: Tom   2005-06-03 11:21  

#5  When Cheney was drenching the world in blood, was that when he was head of Halliburton, or as Vice President?

These guys get me SO confused!
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-06-03 11:18  

#4  The language is the best part of it all. This type of statement from the DPRk always comes through like the under-the-breath mutterings of a paranoid schizophrenic shambling up the street talking to the sky.
Posted by: Tkat   2005-06-03 10:43  

#3  Vituperation - The word is in regular use although normally as an adjective - vituperative. I come across it on a regular basis, normally as a fancy synonym for swearing.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-06-03 09:28  

#2  The remarks of Cheney, boss of the hawkish hard-liners, revealed the true colors of this group steering the implementation of the policy of the Bush administration.

What, no name calling, like neo-cons or Jooooos' lapdogs? And where's all the threats of the U.S. going down in a "sea of fire?" Man, the DPRK's losing their touch.
Posted by: BA   2005-06-03 09:02  

#1  Vituperation? Where the hell did they get that word from, I speak english as a first language and I had to look that one up.

Websters New World Dictionary:

VITUPERATION:
1. the act of vituperating

well, there you have it.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-06-03 08:54  

00:00